[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

Apologies for the hour of downtime, the site got dropped by the host.

File: fishback.jpg 📥︎ (11.36 KB, 400x222) ImgOps

File: potentialmanofpolitics.jpg 📥︎ (288.94 KB, 1500x1500) ImgOps

 â„–3107601[Quote]

THIS MAY JUST BE THE MOST LOW IQ POST OF ALL TIME, BUT PLEASE BARE WITH MY 3RD WORLD SHITSKIN IMMIGRANT BRAIN AND HEAR ME OUT ON THIS. MAYBE THIS HAS BEEN TRIED ONCE THROUGHOUT HISTORY AND FAILED OR MAYBE THERE IS A REALLY BLARINGLY OBVIOUS REASON WHY THIS DOESN'T WORK AND I CAN'T SEE IT BECAUSE IM NOT WHITE ENOUGH. HERE IT GOES:

Why can't we just split all Western countries down the middle into 2 sections where one allows immigrants and one doesn't ? It kind of worked on a minature scale with Dutch South Africans but if racial tensions get too high in the future why don't we just [for example] allow NYC to be the ultimate melting pot led by totally not compromised trans qwueen shitskin Zohran Mamdani and let Florida be the ultimate ethnostate led by totally not jewish le heckin based fortnite chungus cuckpilled James Fischbach. Then every state can follow along, surely it won't be 50/50 but theoretically it would probably follow the red and blue states o algo
<reddit spacing
keep in mind this isn't meant to be like jim crow cuz nyc would still allow whites to live there

 â„–3107633[Quote]

Because of beurocracy, liberal democracy and UN and country wise human rights laws

 â„–3107638[Quote]

because this would be retarded +immigrants don't usually move into red states anyways because why tf would you go to Idaho or some BS when you have NOTHING!

 â„–3107640[Quote]

>>3107638
Yeah nobody moves to Texas and Flordia

 â„–3107813[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (163.34 KB, 596x720) ImgOps

>>3107633
i still feel like it's a worth it trade off for both sides if it prevents a race war

Imagine the most libleft anarchist bipoc xista in the blue state voting to KEEP their state segregationist because it means that they will never have a negative experience with anyone from a chud state anymore

i dont have to explain the red state

maybe we do something were like every election they'll hold a poll in each state to see whether they wanna overturn the segregation or not. Am so the blue states will continue voting to keep it and so will the red because they both don't wanna risk any conflict

i feel like this makes sense

 â„–3107854[Quote]

>>3107640
2 exceptions

 â„–3107865[Quote]

>>3107813
Something like this could be possible if they overturn the CRA 1964 but that's not happening. I'm not against secession though

 â„–3107870[Quote]

>>3107601 (OP)
aussie invented segregation



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]