â„–3079428[Quote]
Thank you friend
â„–3079447[Quote]
>>3079419 (OP)Are you Indian?
â„–3079464[Quote]
I'm White/Caucasoid, not American Indian.
â„–3079468[Quote]
>I'm White/Caucasoid, not American Indian.
A response to that Californian's question. I often like to call Native Americans as "American Indians", becuase that's what we like to call them that.
â„–3079472[Quote]
>>I'm White/Caucasoid, not American Indian.
>
>A response to that Californian's question. I often like to call Native Americans as "American Indians", becuase that's what we like to call them that.
But anyway, I'm not American Indian/Native American, as I'm a Caucasian/White person.
â„–3079473[Quote]
>>3079419 (OP)If you are going to limit the world to three major races, then you have categorized the map incorrectly. Australoid people, genetically speaking, are most similar to Mongoloid people(though anthropologically speaking, they were considered to be more Caucasoid looking until these anthropological groups were tested)
So if we are not going to consider Australoid people their own thing(for some retarded reason), then they should absolutely be classified as Mongoloids, not Caucasoid and ESPECIALLY not Negroid.
Classifying Papua New Guinea and Abos as Negroid is retarded
Classifying South/East India as a mix of Caucasoid and Negroid is retarded. Strangely enough, you actually got Madagascar correct, because they are not classic niggers like many assume they are, they are a mix of Negroid and Australoid people, with Australoids being the original stock of the island. Not sure how you got that right when you got something as basic as Papua New Guinea wrong.
â„–3079482[Quote]
>>>3079419 (You) (OP)
>If you are going to limit the world to three major races, then you have categorized the map incorrectly. Australoid people, genetically speaking, are most similar to Mongoloid people(though anthropologically speaking, they were considered to be more Caucasoid looking until these anthropological groups were tested)
>So if we are not going to consider Australoid people their own thing(for some retarded reason), then they should absolutely be classified as Mongoloids, not Caucasoid and ESPECIALLY not Negroid.
>Classifying Papua New Guinea and Abos as Negroid is retarded
>Classifying South/East India as a mix of Caucasoid and Negroid is retarded. Strangely enough, you actually got Madagascar correct, because they are not classic niggers like many assume they are, they are a mix of Negroid and Australoid people, with Australoids being the original stock of the island. Not sure how you got that right when you got something as basic as Papua New Guinea wrong.
Aboriginal Australians and Papuan people phenotypically look a lot like niggers and represent some of the oldest Out of Africa-type populations. They may have came from "Ancient South Eurasians", a branch not really related to Caucasoids or Mongoloids (Dravidians also come from ASE primarily.)
â„–3079495[Quote]
>>3079482>Aboriginal Australians and Papuan people phenotypically look a lot like niggers and represent some of the oldest Out of Africa-type populations.>NotOnly superficially through convergent evolution, but they are not of the same racial background. You cannot classify people racially through phenotype alone, or even use that as your primary method of classification. That is on par with how a retarded caveman sees the world.
â„–3079500[Quote]
>>>>3079419 (You) (OP)
>>If you are going to limit the world to three major races, then you have categorized the map incorrectly. Australoid people, genetically speaking, are most similar to Mongoloid people(though anthropologically speaking, they were considered to be more Caucasoid looking until these anthropological groups were tested)
>>So if we are not going to consider Australoid people their own thing(for some retarded reason), then they should absolutely be classified as Mongoloids, not Caucasoid and ESPECIALLY not Negroid.
>>Classifying Papua New Guinea and Abos as Negroid is retarded
>>Classifying South/East India as a mix of Caucasoid and Negroid is retarded. Strangely enough, you actually got Madagascar correct, because they are not classic niggers like many assume they are, they are a mix of Negroid and Australoid people, with Australoids being the original stock of the island. Not sure how you got that right when you got something as basic as Papua New Guinea wrong.
>
>Aboriginal Australians and Papuan people phenotypically look a lot like niggers and represent some of the oldest Out of Africa-type populations. They may have came from "Ancient South Eurasians", a branch not really related to Caucasoids or Mongoloids (Dravidians also come from ASE primarily.)
But if you want, fine, I can fix the map.
â„–3079507[Quote]
>>3079500I would use four anthropological groups, I do not like limiting it to three
If you are going to limit it to three, both Australoids and Mongoloids are East Eurasian whereas Caucasoids are West Eurasian and Negroids are African. So Australoids and Mongoloids share the most recent common ancestors and should be in the same group if you only want three groups because da bible or something.
â„–3079552[Quote]
>>3079551Why is Madagascar still Negroid/Mongoloid if Australoids are now a group?
â„–3079554[Quote]
>>3079552Also if you want, you could put a green dot where the Ainu in Japan live, since they are Australoid.
â„–3079555[Quote]
>>3079554Though I think they are mixed with Mongoloids too, unsure.
â„–3079577[Quote]
i can make a much better map
>something went wormg
â„–3079600[Quote]
>>3079473>Australoid people, genetically speaking, are most similar to Mongoloid peopleMarge
â„–3079603[Quote]
>>3079600Explained earlier, they both diverged from Ancestral East Eurasians, unlike Caucasoids who come from Ancestral West Eurasians.