Let us suppose there will be a group of people who will one day save Western Civilization. Do you believe the people who save the West will be democratically elected? >What is the difference between Yes and Yes, they have to beYes means you think they

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
Flag
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: Tuxcatty.png 📥︎ (359.3 KB, 701x1075) ImgOps

File: Stephen Foster - Beautiful….mp3 📥︎ (4.97 MB)

Scob aTzTuTF5 03/15/26 (Sun) 20:18:50 №3055240 [Quote]

Let us suppose there will be a group of people who will one day save Western Civilization. Do you believe the people who save the West will be democratically elected?
>What is the difference between Yes and Yes, they have to be
Yes means you think they will be democratically elected, but theoretically you agree this group could seize power through non-democratic means, you just think this is not likely or that achieving their means through democracy is the path to least resistance and that is how they would seize power.
Yes, they have to be means you believe this group can ONLY save the west if they are democratically elected and that non-democratic strategies of seizing power are doomed to fail.

Scob 1zg16MWf 03/15/26 (Sun) 20:19:09 №3055244 [Quote]

Fuck pisslam

Scob aTzTuTF5 03/15/26 (Sun) 20:19:49 №3055249 [Quote]

File: Australian BreakDancing.mp4 📥︎ (4.07 MB, 360x640) ImgOps

>Fuck pisslam

Asoori!tUUSCNjouw TWV6Qb3O [VPN] 03/15/26 (Sun) 20:24:11 №3055274 [Quote]

File: images (12).jpeg 📥︎ (22.19 KB, 588x309) ImgOps

The NSDAP was elected by a democratic ways in the end (doe at first they been arrested).
But I don't think the modren circumstances in the west are the same as Weimar republic, half of the people don't own anything and they don't mind it.
So if I had to guess it must be a war.