â„–3049821[Quote]
>>3049686 (OP)Pole detected, point discarded
â„–3049830[Quote]
>>3049686 (OP)pole detected, point taken
â„–3049849[Quote]
>>3049830>Indiana>I N D I A >I N D I A NIndian detected
â„–3049902[Quote]
>>3049686 (OP)This thread is POLACKED
â„–3050045[Quote]
>>3049686 (OP)Absolute gem from a common coal poster
â„–3050052[Quote]
>>3050036VPN user from a country that was either colonized by the US or the UK (both laissez-faire economies) award
Laissez-faire won
â„–3050089[Quote]
>>3050062>implying that a farmer wouldn't be hired by the globo-shlomo Inc. TMLibertararyans…
â„–3050096[Quote]
>>3050062You can just stop eating dogshit if you want, dumbass.
â„–3050102[Quote]
>>3050096>no argument>>3050089Idk maybe in ancap but not in libertariansm, why would you highlight that otherwise doe?
â„–3050111[Quote]
>>3050102isn't the only difference between the two is small-government vs no government?
â„–3050122[Quote]
>>3050111Any separate libertarian jurisdiction can have whatever laws it wants, it's a country within a country basically
â„–3050137[Quote]
>>3050122What are you on about? Libertarianism IS anarcho-capitalism. They're synonyms. Anyone who has ever read Rothbard knows it.
>but people don't use the word "libertarianism" that wayBoohoo I don't care. We already have specific words for what you're talking about.
>it's a country within a country basicallyThat's called a Special Economic Zone (SEZ).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_economic_zone# â„–3050152[Quote]
>>3050137They are not the same at least because these are different words. There a thrembillion definitions of libertarianism; rothbard and ayn rand are nophono nigger shit that you shouldn't read
â„–3050158[Quote]
>>3050137I'm talking about all laws, not trade laws only
â„–3050165[Quote]
>>3050036No arrow. 'ru immigrant.
â„–3050177[Quote]
GEM 💎 GEM 💎 GEM 💎