№3035289[Quote]
>>3035243 (OP)Not as bad as people make it out to be
№3035298[Quote]
Im skeptical to it
№3035321[Quote]
>>3035298For instance don't yo think it would be best to maybe not let someone with an extreme genetic disease have children?
№3035335[Quote]
>>3035321Yeah but it depends on if we are exterminating them actively or just sterilizing. And I'm afraid what if the system ends up being corrupted in some way.
№3035337[Quote]
>>3035335Just sterilizing. And what do you mean by corrupted
№3035338[Quote]
>>3035335How about restricitng browns to only 1 child?
№3035356[Quote]
Realistically there is no reason to not practice Eugenics, we could simply do it by developing embryo selection. Richard Lynn thinks we could increase the average IQ past 200 in around 5 generations, and to preserve the Alleles (which are recessive) that give super cool traits like different eye colors, blonde hair, auburn hair, etc, it will be necessary. If I have kids I will do it.
>>3035321You could insure they will not have those negative traits if modern embryo selection is developed, but
(((they))) won't allow that because a population that will work for pennies on the dollar is easier to make money off of.
№3035361[Quote]
>>3035356Well also people that have a history of abusing children and such as well, but that is a better way to do that without hurting anyone
№3035370[Quote]
>>3035338I want browns to get slowly repatriated with africa or exterminated.
№3035376[Quote]
>>3035338>>3035337Oh these guys should be exterminated, if chuds ever end up making a happening we could manufacture another covid type of panic, and then use that to inject them with some kind of vaccine that might sterilize them based on race.
Really, I don't see an issue with slaughtering the niggers. They are like animals, and either way are not a part of "our group", but rather different, competing nations.
>>3035361yeah these people should be killed as well. A huge reason for why whites are the way we are is due to the church, that being that those who displayed anti social behavior were jailed/killed.
Remember, culture comes from people, not culture.
№3035382[Quote]
>>3035356We don't want everyone to have 2 thrembillion IQ, otherwise everyone will become socially awkward and autistic, bio diversity is necessary for any soyciety to prosper, although I still support eugenics fro traits which are just negative to survival
№3035386[Quote]
>>3035382Ehh I mean there might be something to that but we won't know until we try
№3035396[Quote]
>>3035382That is only an issue for humans as we exist now, a population with an average IQ of 200…. Think about it, 100 million Nikola Teslas', 100 million of whatever the top engineers are for lockheed martin, etc. What would that society even look like?
Also, the reason intelligent people have trouble communicating with other people is for the same reason normies have trouble communicating with literal downie retards.
№3035408[Quote]
>>3035396And a population with no labourers either, smart people won't settle for stuff like that.
№3035411[Quote]
>>3035408A population that intelligent might just make machines to do it for them, or maybe engineer a slave race. Who knows, maybe they would unironically pull some kind of retvrn to tradition thing, and live in nature.
№3035424[Quote]
>>3035411Creating machines/ a slave species is probably the only choice they'd have, and I personally do not find it in any way attractive, having your survival depend on another species/machine is a really risky strategy.
№3035458[Quote]
>>3035408I hate to be like this, but it is such a mixed Brazilian nigger take that ensuring the genetics of a population are superior is somehow a bad thing. I know that's ironic coming from a le amerimutt o algo.
The only way it is a risky strategy is if you lose control, and for, in a sense, biological slave machines, that would be very easy to "code" for. Maybe you could have some kind of feeling that is released when following orders, maybe you could implant bombs in them, something. It really isn't very risky. The difference in power would be as a candle flickers to a tsunami, a platoon of marines armed with nuclear weapons sent to fight a tribe of chimpanzees.
We already create machines to do our bidding, machines become dangerous when they are superior to us.
Humans become dangerous when they are uncomfortable,
№3035462[Quote]
>>3035458Yes but comfort is bad for humanity. We Long for struggle
№3035464[Quote]
>>3035462These would not be humans.
№3035466[Quote]
>>3035462>>3035424At the end of the day, the point is that they would figure out a solution that is probably above us.
№3035504[Quote]
>>3035458>Objective superiority Nophono,traits are selected by the environment and the environment is constantly changing, you can at best say that generalist traits are gooder, but they will be outclassed by specialists in their niches so even that is not superior to anything, intelligence in specific has been maladaptive for most of evolution, spending more energy in your brain over something like muscles and strength meant it was harder for you to defend your own offspring which gave an incentive for foids to not go after smart pipo, the only reason we aren't still monkeys is because Europe's environment was noticeably more forgiving then something like Africa.
>It's not risky because erm…It isn't just about control, if *anything* in the environment wipes out or cripples the slaves/machines, it's over.
>>3035466>They would figure it out because they're smartergeg
№3035508[Quote]
>>3035243 (OP)They should use it for autistic people and men under 6 foot
№3035524[Quote]
>>3035508For a lot of people with autism yeah probably bc they wouldn't be capable of raising a child properly if their low functioning
№3035560[Quote]
brimstone
№3035615[Quote]
>>3035504>Traits are selected by the environment, and the environment is constantly changing.Yes, that is how it works. Genetic engineering and embryo selection will be what thrusts humanity into new heights. The entire point is that we will be able to create humans for what is required.
>Implying intelligence is not the sole reason humans succeeded as we did>Implying foids "selected" men as they do now 1 million years ago, or even 15 thousand years ago>Misinterpreting cold theoryErrmmmmm, yeah no. How do you think a bunch of monkeys take out a woolly mammoth? Maybe by superior intelligence? Maybe by making tools, and traps? Does that require gorilla strength or homo sapien (sapien) brains? Do you think women were twerking on tiktok, and demanding le 666 men? They were being fucking raped, and were forced to give birth to whatever monkey's child who had just came inside of her.
But why? Do you think that a colder environment might have selected for… intelligence? Maybe planning? Maybe having natural weather cycles, and large mega fauna, selects for planning? Europe was easier once you learned how to live in it, but those who could not learn simply died.
>>They would figure it out because they're smarterCould you figure out how to make nuclear bombs Oppenheimer did? Do you know he was able to and you aren't (Hint: it's because he was smarter than you)
>>It isn't risky because there are ways to maintain control over populations in a high tech society, particularly when one group controls the resources, weapons, and power (which is literally what we see now, so imagine the difference between us, and a superior population.)Maybe you should try ropemaxxing?
№3035728[Quote]
>>3035615Why do you think you'll know better then nature doe?
>The 200 IQ humans will figure it outNo. Just no. You need to reach that point first, and like I said before greater intellect comes at the cost of generally anti social/individualist behaviour, people rely more on themselves rather then others, and no, normies aren't pushing smart pipo away, a good example is just suicide rates, there's no logical reason for one to kill xherself, especially if they're so smart, but smart folk lack emotional regulation normal pipo have so they ropemaxx all the time, as for Europe, yeah, it did select for greater intellect, I was wrong ou algx, Neanderthal are a good example of how pure strength can be maladaptive, but this still doesn't disprove my point that traits like intelligence can switch from maladaptive to beneficial very quickly, i just gave a bad/wrong example.
№3035864[Quote]
Gem
№3036722[Quote]
>>3035243 (OP)smug dego
looks like a fucking retard. it's funny he got ack'd
№3036818[Quote]
its gud because we can make super humans or som