№2995303[Quote]
Sure
№2995305[Quote]
Potential ipgrabber
№2995314[Quote]
this test fucking sucks i dont agree with any of this
№2995317[Quote]
>>2995293 (OP)/leftypol/ ip grabber dni
№2995320[Quote]
>>2995305I saw this test outside sharty , so don't worry much
№2995326[Quote]
>>2995318i am not refering to your beliefs i am refering to the questions theyre dumb
№2995334[Quote]
>>2995326It's still a short and fun test give it a shot
№2995346[Quote]
>1.1
Oh hell yeah let me drive back home first
№2995353[Quote]
>>2995293 (OP)i dont see why not
№2995366[Quote]
>>2995337gemmy
>>2995340smells like aids
№2995395[Quote]
>>2995366reported for homophobia
№2995407[Quote]
>>2995383>closest is to Julius Evola, so thats coollaaaarrrrrpppp larplarplarp
№2995440[Quote]
>>2995293 (OP)fucking goyslop on ingesh, ESL vvon
№2995449[Quote]
>>2995407you will never be a vivaldi wompa
№2995572[Quote]
>>2995545Strong ethno-nation but leave me the fuck alone economically
№2995614[Quote]
>>2995293 (OP)NOBALDI FUCKING CARES ABOUT YOUR 800TH SCNA INNACURATE POLTICAL NIGGER COMPASS ITS ALL BAIT BY THE JEWS TO MAKE YOU WASTE TIME ON ANSWERING CAREFULLY DESIGNED QUESTIONS MADE TO INDOCTRINATE YOU INTO EITHER BECOMING AN EXTREMIST OR TURNING YOU INTO A GOYCATTLE SLAVE FUCK OFF STUPID RETARDED KIKE I HOPE THEY BLOW UP YOUR FUCKING FAMILY IN TEL AVIV
№2995634[Quote]
>>2995618we turkaryans have this physique lol
№2995680[Quote]
>>2995665Also i'm Racialist but since I picked "broad collection of related races" I got put as Pan-Nationalist. Probably because politics reddit doesn't understand the concept of the White Race yet
№2995693[Quote]
shitty test
№2995694[Quote]
>>2995680It said ethnicities not races
№2995704[Quote]
>>2995511ev&doe he meant that man and womanhood are not purely biological but also spiritual
№2995712[Quote]
>>2995703What sort of options would you like to see?
№2995729[Quote]
>>2995712The main thing for me is it should take into account nuance. Just because I want a strong leader doesn't mean I want a Monarch, which is what I noticed the test was alluding towards when I picked the "Strong Leader" option
№2995738[Quote]
>>2995694Look man, in Northern Italy they learn High German and Gothic before they learn English, cut him some slack!
№2995741[Quote]
File: pepe.png 📥︎ (48.04 KB, 976x850) 674d8f810448126281190258de3f0d930.006ImgOps
>>2995729The strong leader in question has already stepped outside the democratic bubble hasn't he? How much nuance can you add in such a short test? I believe 'by blood,' 'by God,' or raw power essentially covers the main types of autocracy
№2995868[Quote]
>>2995796holy raisin we got the same ones
№2995874[Quote]
>>2995796state socialism refers to the german one right? then It's keyed
№2995940[Quote]
>>2995922How did you manage to get dirigisme? Every time I tried it gave me corporatism
№2996065[Quote]
>>2995966You're one of the few cool lolberters
№2996075[Quote]
>>2996063>confiscatory taxationit's niggerhell
№2996080[Quote]
It's so funny how pretty much every political system works when it's institutionalized by a willing, ethnically, culturally, and religiously homogenous society. Basically everyone just needs to be racist woah…….
№2996088[Quote]
>>2996080unity through racism [:transheart:]
№2996105[Quote]
>>2995940private ownership -> actively manage and steer the market -> technocractic planning
№2996106[Quote]
>>2996075Wrong. Letting economic dynasties form is how you get Rothschilds and parliamentary weak monarchies.
№2996108[Quote]
>>2996080not true, Sweden got considerably worse when it skewed closer to socialism, which is why xey partially reverted some things. I believe South Korea and North Korea could work as a better example; same ethnicity, same culture, different system, and look at how things turned out
№2996111[Quote]
>>2996080Not racism but rather a shared awareness and realism "racism" is a word coined by the earliest pseudo-activists and jews
№2996127[Quote]
>>2996063>feudalism larp
>confiscatory taxation farmer-destroying incentive-annihilating brimstone from niggerhell, also doesn't that contradict feudalism since feudalism is based on an aristocracy class which confiscatory taxation is specifically made to prevent from forming?
>traditionalism keyed
>religious authoritarianismkeyed
>ethnatkeyed
>realpolitikkeyed
№2996129[Quote]
>>2996102Not my fault what my kinsmen are doing here but I'm very fond of you frog poster for creating that default pepe for me
№2996132[Quote]
>>2996051Constitutional Monarchy but I'd prefer either
№2996134[Quote]
>>2996106But would they form in a proper ethnically nationalistic society? In a perfect world the aristocracy would be in a symbiotic relationship with the underclasses so they would both benefit each other. Would the society be able to withstand subversion that would pervert that relationship? Ehh……….
№2996136[Quote]
>>2996119Yeah you're right there are better terms for it
№2996144[Quote]
>>2995703true
but that's what you get when 90% of those tests are made by preddit libtards
№2996149[Quote]
>>2996132I prefer a semi-constitutional system similar to the early german empire and austro-hungarian empire
№2996157[Quote]
>>2996129It was no big deal.
>>2996132Do you at least support limited instances of democracy in your ideal system? For example, referendums regarding the declaration of war?
№2996160[Quote]
did anyborundi get an exact match yet
№2996173[Quote]
>>>2996132
>Do you at least support limited instances of democracy in your ideal system? For example, referendums regarding the declaration of war?
Definitely one of the flaws in this test, leaving out important nuances
№2996179[Quote]
>>2996160I did in my op picrel though It wasn't serious
№2996181[Quote]
>>2996157No. I think people should have a say in how they're governed, but only on a local scale, and not via voting.
№2996206[Quote]
>>2996181and only when it comes to things of a more clerical/administrative nature*
for example, abortion is a moral issue, that is to say it is objectively evil, thus it should not be subject to the will of the people
№2996269[Quote]
>>2996202The idea would be that people in certain sectors would have say on matters relevant to their own lives. They would have this say via groups that were formed surrounding these sectors. These would traditionally be called guilds, but I am hesitant to use that word. Maybe "union" or "syndicate", I don't know. These "guilds" would then be able to have limited collective say on local matters concerning their sphere of influence.
The power of the King would also be checked by the Church, which is how it worked (sometimes) back in ye olden days. The risk there is that the Church itself can become corrupted when it's incentivized to act a certain way for political expediency.
This is all basically just my political fantasy though, I'm sure there's a million things wrong with it.
№2996300[Quote]
>>2996134Aristocracy should be based upon lineage, military service, and titles given by a monarch with Supreme authority, not merchantilism.
№2996324[Quote]
>>2996298Exactly, my vision of a system would mean that career politicians would cease to exist to a significant extent.
№2996416[Quote]
>>2996300Yeah, true. Excellence in a system that rewards antisocial behavior doesn't exactly cause the cream to rise to the top. There is much more merit in service to the people than to oneself.
№2996480[Quote]
>>2996425That demigod status still exists in oligarchic technocratic tyranny masquerading as representative democracy.
№2996518[Quote]
Divine right has a biblical basis. Daniel 2:21 & 4:17, Romans 13:1-2, Proverbs 8:15-16, Proverbs 21:1
№2996536[Quote]
>>2996387That's why I'm suspicious of absolute monarchy. The legitimacy of power and authority may flow through blood and manifest itself in worldly power, it's source is still in God.
№2996542[Quote]
Divine right is true and is all that ever existed in practice whether you believe in it or not, even if you are atheist or believe the logos is not a conscious being.
№2996553[Quote]
>>2996425>The king sees himself as God's will actualized in mortal formThat actually is what a king is to some extent, although he should not see himself as impassable as God is. A king derives his authority from God, which means he can lose it as well. This is why its important for the Church to check the king's authority.
№2996603[Quote]
>>2996592If God is the father of the world and its people I'd like to regard a monarch as the father of a nation and its subjects
№2996620[Quote]
>>2996592Are those two things mutually exclusive? We all have callings in life, and we serve God via them. A king's calling is to rule, he is granted the legitimacy to do so by God, and so he serves God by ruling over his people benevolently.
№2996637[Quote]
>>2996620>he is granted the legitimacy to do so by GodHow would the king be chosen though
№2996639[Quote]
>>2996592Well right now Trump and a kabal of child eating kikes are manifestations of God's permissive will because the underclasses are so weak, decadent and ignorant. Nothing happens without God's will permitting it. God is real whether you believe he is a divine being with a conscious or not in the form of the logic and laws that govern the physical universe.
№2996659[Quote]
>>2996648Romans 13:1-2, Daniel 2:21 & 4:17, Proverbs 8:15-16, Proverbs 21:1
№2996717[Quote]
>>2996648Acting in pure accordance of God's will via transfiguration and becoming a saint is the entire point of Christianity. Nothing impure enters heaven.
№2996724[Quote]
>>2996648I think your concept of Christian ethics might be, understandably, tainted by Western ideas of Original Sin/Original Guilt.
>mortal beings cannot be expected to act in pure accordance with his willWe are all called to live in accordance with God's will. While most of us fail miserably, surely there are some who are better than others, no? Exceptional people exist, that's why there are Saints, and it's why the position of King is exclusive. A King is also not expected to literally be perfect.
>not even the PopeThe Pope is literally called the Vicar of Christ on Earth everthoughbeit
№2996727[Quote]
>>2996659Please don't tempt me to play the part of reddit atheist and list some of the more wacky lines from the bible like wearing clothing made from blends of synthetic and natural fabrics being a sin and it condoning slavery. I really do like Christians and Christianity.
>>2996717I am being baited.
№2996750[Quote]
>>2996727You are a protestant? Good news: we aren't subject to the laws of Moses under the new covenant. We don't stone people to death. Cmon bruh.
№2996760[Quote]
>>2996747Doesn't matter since you play EPI troon fighting games
№2996772[Quote]
>>2996727Blud doesn't know the difference between the New and Old Covenant
also I don't think he's baiting
№2996773[Quote]
>>2996724I wasn't suggesting everyone is equally susceptible to sinful temptations, but human-beings act hypocritically and unethically. That's not me excusing them, quite the opposite. Mortal men should not be revered as instruments of God. We can cherish their wise insights, appreciate virtuous traits and actions they have taken, but mortal-beings are not to be given our absolute trust.
>>2996750I'm agnostic.
№2996777[Quote]
>>2996760>>2996754Meds, i just like reading chekhov and pushkin
№2996779[Quote]
>>2996750The old covenant is still relevant to some extant
№2996780[Quote]
>>2996637@Minnesodan orthobrap I know I'm retarded but I still need you to answer this
№2996785[Quote]
>>2996779The ten commandments are the only laws that all people are held accountable to. We're not subject to the levitcal laws at all.
№2996803[Quote]
>>2996773>Mortal men should not be revered as instruments of God.Why not?
>mortal-beings are not to be given our absolute trust.I don't think a king should be worshiped, the only thing someone ought to put their absolute trust in is God. I think maybe you are misinterpreting my "A King's power is derived from God" as "A King should be given the power of God". The Monarchy is just a position of worldly authority.
>>2996637>>2996780Sorry, I missed this. Historically kings are just leaders of their people (it's why the word has the same root as "kin") and can emerge in any way. To be granted authority by God would need to be done by the Church, which was established by Jesus Christ.
№2996811[Quote]
test
№2996828[Quote]
>>2996817You're welcome Tunisiaryan
№2996882[Quote]
>>2996851Divine right does not equal divine status. It's not difficult to understand.
№2996891[Quote]
>>2996851>Nation-states and their laws are inventions of human custom; they are not of divine origin.A king is above a nation-state and it's laws though. Unless you mean from a moral perspective, i.e. murder being bad, in which case that actually does have a divine origin.
№2996894[Quote]
>>2996889I'm agreeing with you
№2996914[Quote]
>>2996901I suppose that makes sense given your agnosticism. Still, thank you for the conversation and inquiry on my beliefs.
№2996929[Quote]
>>2996901You say you like Christianity but you don't really understand it. You don't really seem to have a clear viewpoint or even a clear grasp on language enough to discern other people's point if view.
№2996942[Quote]
>>2996929I don't think you're giving WPR enough credit, he's a smart guy, he just isn't a Christian, and theology isn't his field of expertise.
>white-knighting