>>2979528>ant-ihumanI don't care, half of the planet is filled with zoo animals for all I care. Australian aboriginals are homosapiens too, wiping them out would only improve the world. Same hoes for the populations inhabiting Sub saharan africa
>individuals which might as well turn out to be great workers, even if not suited for complex tasks, to lighter, but still immoral, coercive measures.Anyone with this type of job is getting automated out of the job market in the future and if their genotypic maximum skill is in that vicinity then they'll be unemployed or on welfare and continuing their subaltern familial line.
We can safely say anyone grouped under 90iq is a net fiscal drain on public resources even with a minimum welfare state. Here's the impact disagregated by race, latinx and blacks in america have never paid more in taxes than they have recieved in welfare, you're basically creating sponges than suck up money on average and have higher fertility rates(for hispanics). You don't know how bad the situation is, in the dating market one of the least selected for traits is >1/2SD intelligence and dumber and poorer people outnumbered smart and rich people in being parents 2/1, it'd full on dysgenics, without even considering global demograpgics. You NEED state guided eugenics, even if you don't believe in negative eugenics.
I'm not a libertarian.
>we're both autists, autism is a disability, no? Do you believe the State should be allowed to ban you from having kids?I'm not autistic, or i haven't gotten it checked but high functioning autism, adhd, shit like that is not what i mean. I'm talking about sevear disabilities that just render you a state resource sponge like schizophrenia, epilepsy, Huntington's disease, blindness, deafness, physical deformities etc. And yes the state should ban these people from having kids. Do you think removing homelessness pople is good? I do, I'd prefer if they were never alive