/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

>You prevent multiculturalism through enforcing a border, everyone knows this. You don't just wave a magic wand to make that happen, that's basic logic, I think, just a theory tho.
No you prevent it by making expression of different culture illegal. It's in the name dumbass. You can't even get your theory right.
>Those are your loved ones, your race is a big family! Jews do this, blacks do this, latinx do this, filipinx do this, jeets do this, every race except Europeans does this.
No they don't, ask any of them if they would give up on their loved ones (they are a different race) and they would not. Again, race is just a fucking concept, and even if it wasn't it would be like caring for all red-haired people simply because they share a trait with you.
>They actually do. A lot of people are race traitors and would LOVE to bring in infinite browns for cheap labor and high crimes. Go to my country, browns rape kids here and judges give them 3 years max, but noooo it's the socio-economic factors holding them ON GUNPOINT, forcing them to rape 12 year old girls amirite? BRING 88 GORILLION OF THESE IN NOW
Zero evidence, just emotion. Cmon, Gold, do you at least have a news headline (not peer reviewed) to make it seem like you're right? Also the socio-economic factor thing is such a lame strawman I won't even entertain it.
>They actually are! First 10 sentences of the "consensus" made by (((ACKermann))), (((Bolnick))) and (((Fuentes))), and they're already wrong! You actually can biologically divide races into distinct continental types, AND racial genetic clusters. Hope this helps :).
Oh, really? Well I hope you have peer reviewed research behind that statement otherwise it's quite useless. Really hoping this will help ;)
>If this were a fact, there would be no genetic difference between you and me and we would be perfectly identical, yet we aren't. There would be no females, nor will there be males or people with hereditary diseases or different pigmentation, people would have no distinct noses, or heights. Races indeed do exist because genetics are a reality. You deny a very simple trivial fact, something we've recognized for THOUSANDS of years.
No, no no no NO! This is just a strawman and non sequitur that Im amazed how you are even allowed to be on here. Nobody serious is claiming that differences don't exist, just that they don't map onto discrete categories like you claim they do. You confused biological sex and race, when they are completely. Did you know that people also hold to Biblical literalism and even flat earth? Or that people believe that a jealous look could give you an illness? Please, do not make a fool out of your self when you hold ancient "knowledge" to such a high standard.
>Your people is your nation. Nations are people, a race; nacioun.
Do you honestly think that a nation is reducible to its people? How do you explain different countries in Africa then? Or anywhere in the world? Nations are people + state with specific laws and a specific border.
>If people are aware of their race, and they form a collective they will form an in-group preference.
1. Assuming race even exists, but I'll grant you that many people intuitively feel like it exists because of some variation (still not discrete).
2. What do you mean by "collective"? Is there anything more to a 'collective' than race? Like, does a collective also consist of shared desires or not? Because many people 'disobey' their 'race', so no, most do not share desires.
This isn't as clear-cut
>"ITS JUST RANDOM PIPO!!! ALSO ALL STUDIES I DONT AGREE WITH ARE CHERRYPICKED, AND UHH THEY ARENT SUPERVISED BY THE OH SO POWERFUL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH MINISTRY OF TRUTH THAT BOYCOTTS ANY STUDY THAT DARES MENTION RACE AS A BIOLOGICAL FACT. ALL DISCOURSE AROUND SCIENCE HAS TO BE DONE BY WHOLESOME REDDIT CHUNGUS PEOPLE APPROVED BY A STATE MONOPOLY ON TRUTH OR ELSE YOU'RE A BIGOT NAZI THAT DESERVES TO DIEEEE"
GEEEEEEG now you're going ballistic. Peer review is awesome, it prevents losers like Charles Murray (proven crank and sophist) and his disciples (like Emil Kirkegaard, who also supports CP btw, but he's a whole different can of worms) from publishing in respected journals, as the ACTUAL experts in the field are able to refute their nonsense on the spot. This makes race "scientists" big mad, so they create these shitty little pictures because that is easier than actually publishing good research. Creationists, antivaxxers, homeopaths and anti-GMO activists use the same whiny excuses, but deep down they know that peer review is useful and that their research isn't. Race 'science' is no different from creation science, or germ theory denial.
This isn't even bait (never was), but you're actually retarded enough to believe in such nonsense. I mean, good on you, that takes some willful ignorance and determination. But it won't change that fact that science disagrees with you.
@Gold