>>2930924>elaborateWomen have never had their own revolutions for ideological reasons it was only for basic rights and shiet. Weimar Germany was the most liberal place in Europe and then hitler came and turned it fashist and no woman protested evendoe they were the biggest liberals. Most resistance was done by men even at the end of the war it was german soldiers siding with the enemy against hitler
<niggerThe current kike government is taking advantage of this and its working. The reason why America was so cucked pre trump is because of how influential the liberals got through appealing to female emotionality and acceptance of whatever is the current thing
<niggerCompanies do that too, they appeal to the female consumer so they can buy the product, make it popular and then get the male consumer to buy it due to him wanting to get pussy. I think liberal politics do that too
<niggerThat being said I think if there was some sort of fascist takeover they'd accept It. Not because of It appealing to them but because of the said acceptance of whatever is the current thing. I think it's biological really
<niggerYou can see this in politics too every female president candidates were just the female version of the male president before. Hilary Clinton was Bill Clinton and Kamala would've been Biden. You can see this with no radical underground movements having no female leaders
<niggerTo explain how it is biological I think it's cause women have been conditioned to accept their circumstances since the dawn of man. While we were primitive they had to accept whatever man bred with them to survive, this followed to medival period and even the modern times until the feminist movement or however the clitty is leaked. In the Era of war, rape and murder they knew they couldn't fight the people made for war, rape and murder so they clung onto whoever protected them, them usually being men
<niggerThat's my thesis