β2813804[Quote]
Yes for thinking being against pedophilia (exact word, nothing about ephebo- hebe- shit just pedophilia) is moralfagging.
β2813835[Quote]
He's been evading a rule 3 ban for ages
β2813846[Quote]
>>2813835Yea but today xe banned for rule 2
β2813850[Quote]
Got banned* eslbomb
β2813863[Quote]
I hope it's not that same Montanan that brings up his kids all the time.
β2813867[Quote]
>>2813859Rothbard since you're not religious what is your stance on morality and if universal morality exists or not
β2813871[Quote]
how did he even get banned for r3 anyway
β2813872[Quote]
>>2813804cap he didn't do this? did he?
β2813927[Quote]
>>2813863He was using my name earlier
or i think thats the british?
I honestly have no idea who is who
β2813935[Quote]
>>2813915How do you justify that these "ethics" are objectively virtuous without g-d saying it though
Also that gyros looks delicious
β2813937[Quote]
Wasn't the first time and won't be the last
β2813952[Quote]
>>2813951
>>2813945
Urgent reported
β2813954[Quote]
>>2813859Do you have ss?
>>2813872Look up the thread, only my question remains, his reppies got deleted. I asked him to elaborate how pedophilia and moralfagging are related o algo sec i will find it. Then his reppies got banished
β2813957[Quote]
>>2813951
Post your ban appeal i want to see ur reppy
β2813960[Quote]
>>2813956
Post the reppies tranny
β2813983[Quote]
>>2813954doooooooood just post screenshots
β2813985[Quote]
>>2813956
lol are you ban evading now
β2813987[Quote]
ohhhhhhhh im retarded i was thinking of yonatan and how ooc this would be for him. i don't really care about this nigga tbh
β2814002[Quote]
>>2813966I don't think I understand your point? Unrelated strangers owe nothing to each other.
β2814012[Quote]
>>2813964
Post your ban reason reply jfc tranny just do this
β2814013[Quote]
>>2813974smart aryan would dig through the trash and sell the valuables
β2814054[Quote]
>>2814019idk nigga i wasnt there!!!!
β2814079[Quote]
>>2814047
Wordswordswords whypepo cant meme, post the original reply π€£
β2814099[Quote]
>>2814018
gem
β2814100[Quote]
>>2814076You dont believe in God though so how do you come to that?
β2814119[Quote]
>>2814043But this is besides the point. Why would I help this complete stranger who I owe nothing to and assuming I am not going to gain anything from it?
β2814203[Quote]
>>2814183
Thought-provoking. Post reppies
β2814345[Quote]
>>2814097If the tribe I described believed the Earth was flat because the same voodoo witch that told them underage sex would cure them of their aids, would that really put into serious question whether or not it actually is? What is regarded as fact changes with time as new data is collected and theories are scrutinized, but at any given interval in time there is an understanding that some actions cause harm, seemingly without fail, to all relevant parties, while others are quid-pro-quo with regards to the persons' mental and material wellbeing.
>>2814119This is where one's conscience comes into place. This admittedly isn't a reliable mechanism in psychopaths and sociopaths, but most people aren't those two things. People who are characterized by sympathy, empathy, etc can at the very least envision for themselves what occurs to others. A once starving man, who isn't a sociopath or psychopath, who now has more than enough to eat is more likely to give to a beggar asking for food, if not out of pure compassion, because they see the pain they endured in the other person and therefore see part of themselves in said beggar. To help them is subconsciously thought to be as if they were helping themselves at their low point in life.
β2814454[Quote]
>>2814345But this is an illogical approach. You're helping the man out of empathy which is simply a feeling. And if you accept that morality comes from feelings then there is no reason to be kind to someone you do not feel emotional empathy for, even if you rationally consider them to be in need of help, so it would be okay to not care for a starving beggar if for some reason you're not emotionally feeling compassion towards them at that moment. Also, if you think that morality comes from feelings then there is no objective morality or ethics as you call it since each person processes emotions differently, with psychopaths as you said being a great example of it.
β2814517[Quote]
up
β2814558[Quote]
>>2814529Alright
See you later sis
β2814798[Quote]
>>2814782
Kys pick another vpn
β2814986[Quote]
THE TURNED XIM INTO A SHADOW CREATURE
β2815530[Quote]
up
β2816161[Quote]
up
β2816165[Quote]
>>2816161spaniard stop negrobumping like you always do
β2816206[Quote]
>>2816165I just want to see rothbard's insight
β2816213[Quote]
>>2814090screenshot unc π
β2816551[Quote]
>>2814454>>2814558>>2816206Hey I'm still kind of distracted so sorry if this turns out to be a short and disappointing response.
<reddit spaceI guess I'm confused by, and correct me if I've misinterpreted you, the implication that empathy varying from person to person in terms of how much one has and how they express it contradicts the idea of objective ethics from a secular/agnostic perspective.
β2818569[Quote]
>>2816551Because from what I've understood from your argument, you say that morality solely comes from emotions, which means that there is no objective morality as everyone processes these differently. Even if you create a sort of "fake objective morality" (idk what to call it) by taking the emotional response to certain situation the average or the greatest number of people feel, you're just applying a subjective morality over everyone, and also you'd be accepting that in a world in which, for example, killing people were seen as good by most of the population, then it would be "objectively" morally acceptable.
β2818577[Quote]
>>2818569missed an "a" between to and certain
>Can't delete a post this old.