â„–2753595[Quote]
colonization is fine, it's just communications that will be the problem
â„–2753599[Quote]
also the second coming will probably happen before it becomes an issue
â„–2753606[Quote]
everyphono thinks opinions of gemniggers dont matter
â„–2753609[Quote]
Interstellar colonization is a meme. There will NEVER be any human colonies outside of this nigger star system because it will never be economically lucrative.
â„–2753626[Quote]
>>2753595It wouldn't be an intergalactic empire doe it would be isolated pockets of humanity. There would be no point in doing so as the people back home don't benefit.
â„–2753641[Quote]
If the speed of light was even one nanosecond faster life could not exist
â„–2753642[Quote]
>>2753582 (OP)Even though we could reach 10% of C with current tech and reach the nearest star system in 50 years.
â„–2753645[Quote]
>>2753609This. Space discussion always ends up on why humanity needs to land people on a shithole 6 million light BBCs away.
â„–2753648[Quote]
maybe because he dosent want you to go there
â„–2753651[Quote]
>>2753626true! people never do anything irrational!
â„–2753655[Quote]
lame fag that doesn't want us to explore and see aliens and such
â„–2753663[Quote]
>>2753645Because it's there. Because we can. We must.
We should colonize Mercury also.
â„–2753666[Quote]
>>2753642Okay let's say we want alpha centuri. What is there for us? We can't extract shit from it because it's ungodly far away, science would take an ungodly long time to come back home, and space isn't a problem there's plenty of space in space.
â„–2753670[Quote]
>>2753666Trade would be impractical the point would be to spread humanity.
â„–2753673[Quote]
>>2753660terraforming albiet
â„–2753682[Quote]
>>2753663I'm all for stellar colonization and exploitation but there is zero reason to go beyond the Kuiper Belt ever. Might as well not exist.
â„–2753683[Quote]
>>2753660Mars has water and air tho.
â„–2753684[Quote]
>>2753666>extract shit from itthere are literal astroids in our solar system that has multiple millenium worth of materials
>>2753673why not just build space habitats instead of trying to import 100 gorillions of hydrogen and oxygen to some useless shithole though.
â„–2753687[Quote]
could there really be water on europa or is it all hopium
â„–2753688[Quote]
>>2753682Would be cool to spread in case something happens to the earth or the solar system
â„–2753690[Quote]
>>2753683>water yeah le scientists say there are underground deposits
>air99% carbon does NOT count as air
â„–2753691[Quote]
>>2753687Water isn't a problem it's fucking everywhere.
â„–2753701[Quote]
>>2753683You'll get raped by radiation though
â„–2753702[Quote]
>>2753688That's easy doe with future tec, you just shoot a 3d printer with ai caretakers into space that print humans at the destination.
â„–2753706[Quote]
>>2753691>yeah le scientists say there are underground deposits also huge deposits at the poles.
CO2 is great for plants and easily transformed into carbon and oxygen.
>>2753701radiation is a meme.
â„–2753714[Quote]
>>2753683Moon is gooder it's right there, actually will have economic reasons to be raped, and has magma tunnels so nobody gets raped by big radiation cock.
â„–2753720[Quote]
there literally is no material reason to go beyond the sun. the only way we could EVER settle on other planets/star systems is if usa and china start another space race since the only reason humanity went to the moon was because mutt/russianmutt superiority complex
>>2753706>plantsragebait
â„–2753724[Quote]
>>2753714Jeets are actually perfect for space since they're immune to toxins and radiation.
â„–2753740[Quote]
>>2753684no you grow it there not import, most of eartsh oxygen comes from aquatic plants. Building some space habitat in the middle of nowhere is more dangerous and wouldn't hold a lot of people
â„–2753743[Quote]
>>2753724>Space adapted mutant jeets with ship propulsion.Nice try ZOG.
â„–2753745[Quote]
>>2753731Mars isnt suitable for widespread plantlife, mars gets less sun than earth + it also has a toxic dust covering it + radiation
â„–2753746[Quote]
>>2753743shit propulsion*
â„–2753753[Quote]
>>2753743ELQN VVILL DQ THVS
â„–2753759[Quote]
>>2753740moon base > space habitat > terraforming meme
at least in space habitats you are not importing planets worth of water and atmosphere. and since most planets are not naturally suited for life terraforming would be as fragile as just building in space since the planet would require micromanaging to continue as it is after terraforming
â„–2753763[Quote]
>>2753745Radiation doesn't matter. It's not in deadly dosis.
Mars may get less solar but enough for photosynthesis but also just use lamps?
â„–2753766[Quote]
>>2753759yeah a moon base would be the only possible thing for now
â„–2753767[Quote]
>>2753745I think the order might go:
Earth>Moon>Asteroids/Space Habitats >Ceres>Mercury>Mars>Venus
â„–2753777[Quote]
fuck you niggas if I made a colony on mars in ksp with a realistic solar system so can we irl
â„–2753778[Quote]
>>2753763yeah but mars is a cold hellhole so if you want to have plants you will need to build greenhouses which take too much energy. on mars the only energy you get is from nuclear.
at this point its better to just fix earth (TND)
â„–2753781[Quote]
>>2753763I think it's something like a good year before radiation on mars starts getting detrimental? Still that's a logistical nightmare to swap crew all the way in the sticks every year.
â„–2753782[Quote]
>>2753767mercury is so underrated i hate scienceniggers for not caring about it as much as they care about le hecking mars.
â„–2753790[Quote]
>>2753767Why ceres before Mercury?
â„–2753791[Quote]
>>2753782It's a pretty good one only issue is it's a nigger to get to.
â„–2753802[Quote]
>>2753782To much delta V spent for that.
â„–2753808[Quote]
>>2753767but since neither china or usa is willing to spend gorillions establishing a moonbase it is unlikely we will go back to moon in the next decade since anything space related requires some kind of space race to happen in 21st century.
maybe if AI bubble doesnt burst companies will try carrying their datacenters to space o algo.
>>2753791yep. so its just better colonising moon but even before that there are places on earth that can be made livable easier than creating colonies on the moon like the sahara desert etc.
â„–2753809[Quote]
>>2753790It's better than mars and a whole lot easier to get to than mercury.
â„–2753835[Quote]
>>2753790It's better than mars and a whole lot easier to get to than mercury. Only issue with it is power.
>>2753808I'm more interested in the economic gains from it, it's actually viable unlike memes like asteroid mining.
â„–2753854[Quote]
>>2753835i dont think there will be much economic gains from it. afterall unless we run out of a resource on earth its always easier to mine it here instead of astroidbabble. its always easier to build on earth etc.
if the moon base or colonisation ever happens it will be for political reasons. afterall if china landed on the moon and started building bases there so would eu, usa, russia etc.
â„–2754334[Quote]
are wormholes possible? why spend time walking around a wall instead of going over it?
â„–2754602[Quote]
>>2754334They are hypothetical
â„–2756214[Quote]
up