â„–2720765[Quote]
>>2720713Beauty is objective and Jews are anti-beauty that's why the indo-european Gods are depicted naked and beautiful while Jewish slave gods are not to be personified or spoken about. All abrahamics find sexual attraction suspicious as well, which stems from Jewish beauty hatred
â„–2720766[Quote]
I1 clitty leakage incoming.
â„–2720768[Quote]
>>2720757So no one can be held responsible becouse there is no such thing as justice as that would mean there is an absolute moral system, Got it, have a great day
â„–2720770[Quote]
>>2720722I have already known those things but they are cohesively explained on a few pages without the need to study jewish history, mindset, roots and principles of socialism and christianity in matter of which you seem to be the one relying on your beliefs and not facts.
As for the arguments, you're the one derailing the thread about comparing christianity and socialism into butthurt about individualism and committing one logical fallacy after another like here
>>2720619 â„–2720773[Quote]
>>2720765>Beauty is objectiveBut you said that morality is subjective so not following beauty is not morally bad, LoL
Also if beauty is objective then why do people no longer like women with big foreheads like they did in the medieval times?
â„–2720776[Quote]
>>2720718Yea i understand that's the situation and Jews are in control. Christianity is part of this group parasitism which is why im arguing against it
Christbros proving my point every other reply
â„–2720779[Quote]
>>2720726You follow morality of people that worship baby foreskin and bush fires lol
â„–2720780[Quote]
>>2720770>derailing the thread about comparing christianity and socialism You have to be retarded not to realis that the point of the thred was to frame christianity as bad becouse it is "le hekin commie!!111"
â„–2720781[Quote]
>>2720779But you say that there is no such thing as objective morality so there is nothing bad in doing so in your opinion xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
â„–2720783[Quote]
>>2720738Ur genuinely so stupid and low iq so is the slavshit serproach
Subjective morality = morality is relative to each individual and a universal morality can only apply to an in-group
â„–2720786[Quote]
>>2720753Geg slavs are so retarded im repeating myself
Morality is subjective therefore i can think what theyre doing is wrong and they can think its OK which is why the do it
MORON
â„–2720787[Quote]
>>2720783Subjective morality means that there is no True absolute morality, LoL, It means that there exist a lot of different morlities which all are on the same stage of being right becouse there is no such thing as an absolute morality that would be absolutely true
â„–2720788[Quote]
>>2720780As i wrote
>itt "the two things cannot be based on the same principles, because I only like one of them"Your argumentation boils down to this attitude.
â„–2720791[Quote]
>>2720768Morality is enforced by strength
Strength is morality therefore whoever is strong enough to enforce their will on another is the one who imposes justice
Moron
â„–2720793[Quote]
>>2720786So they Think they are right (and they are right becouse there is no absolute moral system that would define who is really right) and you think that you are right (and you are right becouse there is no absolute moral system that would define who is really right)
â„–2720795[Quote]
>>2720316 (OP)So… this is like the worst bait in human history.
â„–2720797[Quote]
>>2720783This slavnigger polski who larps as a kike is baiting he is intentionally baiting and being a retard slavshitnigger, this same nigger argues for slavshits and europeans being descended from DA 12 KIKE SHITSKIN JEW TRIBES N' SHIEET
â„–2720798[Quote]
>>2720791So then when i have 2 powers of the same strenght then i have 2 truths that cotradict eachother? LoL
Basic logic Acks your argument again
â„–2720800[Quote]
>>2720773Yes, beauty is objective bcuz it's eugenic gene expression. Jews don't believe in an objective beauty which is why they are historically dysgenic, sclerotic, ugly people who have used arranged marriages among the populace for strategic and political gain for many thousand years to create an ugly inbred gene pool.
This is why Europeans are the most beautiful.
â„–2720801[Quote]
>>2720797You are actually obsessed LoL
>YOU IS DA BAITING BECOUSE I DONT LIKE YA â„–2720802[Quote]
Jews literally believe Sex and Beauty to be suspicious and sinful. You cannot make this shit up. It's in ur bible retarded polack
â„–2720803[Quote]
>>2720800you still didn't explain why in the medieval times they liked women with ig foreheads and now they don't.
â„–2720805[Quote]
>>2720802LoL you just make shit up
Christianity says that premarital sex is bad, not sex overal
Christianity never says that beauty is bad, you made that up
â„–2720808[Quote]
>>2720781THERE IS THINGS THAT ARE BAD IN MY OPINION THATS BECAUSE MORALITY IS SUBJECTIVE TO THE INDIVIDUAL AND IN-GROUP
DUMB FAG ARE U GENUINELY 70 IQ
â„–2720809[Quote]
keep raging on me paganslvtta
â„–2720810[Quote]
>>2720787CORRECT!
dumb faggot toddler lmao
â„–2720814[Quote]
>>2720808If a man says that the wall is blue and the other says that the wall is green then at least one is wrong
â„–2720817[Quote]
>>2720810Even&oe you are the retarded one as you keep saying that an action can be bad and good at the same time
â„–2720819[Quote]
>subjective moralituh is le heiking real and such but i would never never never never say that killing my mom is moral
â„–2720822[Quote]
>>2720793Yes and it is up to us to compete and win
>>2720797yea he's really dumb. Genuinely has some sort of learning disability or cognitive disability
>>2720798No… that just means whoever is strong enough to enforce their morality to which ever method their group strategy chooses wins.
â„–2720823[Quote]
If you belive in subjctiv morality then you believe that pedophilia is not bad
â„–2720824[Quote]
>>2720779I don't remember the talmud being a holy book of Christians, but of course you know better! Look, if you have come off with this impression of Christianity, that's a you problem. I have read the Bible twice in two different languages and I'm reading it the third time. I have read commentaries, early Church writings that didn't end up in the canon, early church father writings etc. For me this has provided a holistic view of morality, relationships, governance that promotes big families and cohesive communities, protecting your land and property, promoting beauty and self-control and history shows that my interpretation is probably more in line with reality of what the scripture teaches. By your own presuppositions, neither of us are correct or wrong, so does it even matter? BTW admitting relativism means you concede.
â„–2720825[Quote]
>>2720814That's not morality… fucking low iq moron
â„–2720826[Quote]
>>2720822>Yes and it is up to us to compete and winSo if the democrats pass a bill that says that pedophilia is not bad then does that mean that it is not bad? I mean they won against you so they can dictate what is right and what is wrong.
sweet sweet dilemma, eeither morality is objective, or pedophilia is not bad
â„–2720827[Quote]
>>2720814>finding an analogy between differing perceptions of abstracts and physical objectsyou cannot be this retarded
â„–2720835[Quote]
>>2720827answer the question in
>>2720826 â„–2720842[Quote]
kek of course a pagantranny is too scared to defend his own belief
â„–2720850[Quote]
>>2720835I'm not advocating for subjective morality.
I'm just pointing out that you're an idiot and the question that you asked proves it.
â„–2720852[Quote]
>>2720850Answer the question
â„–2720873[Quote]
>if the democrats pass a bill that says paedophilia is not bad then does that mean it is not bad?
It means that the Democrats don't find it bad according to their subjective morality. Yet, you are still looking for an answer embedded in the paradigm of objective morality, asking if "it's not bad".
â„–2720886[Quote]
>>2720873im not asking what they think. im asking if according to wht you said earlier (morality is defined by winners), if it makes it moral
â„–2720896[Quote]
>>2720805Nothing wrong with premarital sex, that's such an arbitrary hall-monitor librarian jew rule lol
Makes no sense and nobody follows it.
Otherwise, beauty is suspicious and sinful to the Jew which is why they don't personify their Gods, and Adam and Eve covered themselves in the garden.
Abrahamics have a universal semitic tradition of distrust in nakedness and icons. Muslims, Jews, and many Christians alike.
Any Christians who did make good art maybe in Renaissance (return to paganism) were simply indulging in ancient European tradition.
Antiquities of the Jews 12.241 (Loeb)
"They hid the circumcision of their genitals, that even when they were naked in the exercises, they might appear to be Greeks."
—
1 Maccabees 1:14-15 (NRSV)
"They built a gymnasium in Jerusalem, according to Gentile custom, and removed the marks of circumcision."
—
Philo of Alexandria
On the Special Laws 1.2-3 (Loeb)
"They strip themselves naked in the gymnasia, exposing what ought to be hidden, and they think shamelessness a virtue."
â„–2720898[Quote]
>>27208861. You're taking me for the VPN guy.
2. You question makes no sense and I just explained why.
â„–2720900[Quote]
>>2720824The talmud isn't a holy book to anybody. The Old Testament is however, which includes odd foreskin worship and a slave God in the form of a bush fire
â„–2720901[Quote]
>>2720826No lol pedophilia is bad in my opinion. According to pedophiles, it's not bad. Therefore morality is subjective.
How many times will you repeat yourself and prove me right?
â„–2720911[Quote]
>>2720873Your polack brethren is a fucking 70 iq moron
â„–2720914[Quote]
>>2720823holy fucking retard
â„–2721109[Quote]
>>2720316 (OP)no they're not because marxist leaders send their golems to kill others, looking at religions, islam is the closest to that