№2718960[Quote]
I dont get it
№2718965[Quote]
>>2718960libertards advocate against government overreach when leftists do it all the time and fuck them over
№2718966[Quote]
>>2718960There will always be communists who would violently overthrow ancapistan.
№2718969[Quote]
File: 40136.jpg 📥︎ (522.21 KB, 1754x1080) d07f0ffc75df18972dbb0a54966f2d5d0.021ImgOps
>laugh at how stupid and gay libertards are ITT
№2718976[Quote]
>>2718969Niggas always be shitflinging. Stonetoss is a homosexual btw
№2718982[Quote]
>>2718949 (OP)The worst thing about loliberts is when they agree that some people are better dead but don't have the balls to do it.
№2719463[Quote]
i was going to make a joke about them being pedos but i remembered the new site rule geg
№2719480[Quote]
>>2719456argeniggers lost KEK
№2719483[Quote]
>>2719456yeah, hes printing allot of money not a real austrian school
№2719495[Quote]
>>2719490>>2719483this is the same excuse commieniggers always make
№2719503[Quote]
>>2719495If he said he was austrian school, why does he increase the power of the central bank like taking out massive loansa and printing allot of money?
№2719526[Quote]
>>2719517Authoritarian capitalism like Pinochet is at least excusable, you can't do this if you truly believe in the NAP ou algx
№2719570[Quote]
up
№2719584[Quote]
>>2719573Never seen you get so leaky you post gore geg
№2719587[Quote]
>>2719526NAP can and WILL only work among the high-trust neighbours of WHITE society that was formed voluntarily through natural order.
>In a covenant concluded among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free (unlimited) speech exists, … naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very purpose of the covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and expelled from society. Likewise, in a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance toward those habitually promoting lifestyles incompatible with this goal. They - the advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles such as, for instance, individual hedonism, parasitism, nature-environment worship, homosexuality, or communism - will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain a libertarian order.Add non-whites to the list of removal and it is perfect Ancapistan
Read Hoppe, nigger. Ancap is all about de-centralisation and volunteer (i.e. not coercing formation like what would you see in USSR where entire villaged were destroyed and all citizens were forced to cities) normal formation of society, like any tribe was for thousands of years in Europe before kikes came, ancap isn't about imaginary government (or lack, thereof) that smoothbrained faggots who never read Hoppe, Rothbard or even Mises talk about where any form of border or authority instantly mean "not da reeel ancap", ev&doe Ancap utopia would look like 1777's USA full of minarchist small states independent of
(((Parliament))).
№2719588[Quote]
>>2719584ive been doing it now, following the footsteps of the Quebecan
№2719597[Quote]
>>2719573>started the process of physical removal of hostile elements in libertarian orderTrue Ancap warrior, I salute you.
№2719651[Quote]
>>2719587>You should read Jew #6589's bookGeg literally no different from commiepedotroons, besides isn't that just the state with extra steps? You're coercing people for what they advocate for, at least the state's purpose is very clearly to coerce and get rid of the undesirables (at least it should be), your ideology is inherently individualistic, applying collective guilt to shitskins is hypocritical, so you can't kill niggers for beings niggers, and that's not even taking into consideration the fact that one dishonest private entity can lie to it's shareholders about how much money they are making and cause complete economic collapse ou algo, it's a deeply flawed and unthought of ideology.
№2719678[Quote]
>>2719588The term for someone from Quebec is Quebecois BTW
№2719801[Quote]
>>2719651>>2719456chart going back almost to the new milennia.. nusois
>>2718966In an AnCapistan, there's no voting. You would have to revolt to overthrow all of the private security agencies and militias which would form from landowners securing their interests.
>>2719488>mises calls ayn rand a "little jewish girl" as an insult>jew>>2719587Somewhat true but backwards.The NAP has developed from the high trust society of America and elsewhere. If somebody violates NAP, they can be removed, selecting for anybody who follows the NAP. These people are majority white, I'll admit, but blacks or any other race following NAP can be in this society, and uniquely can be excluded as soon as this condition is no longer true.
>>2719597Physical removal is first the expulsion of
(((those undesirable elements which should violate the NAP as soon as they are able and proven to be)))>>2719651Dude.. Hoppe's like the 1 non jew out of the Austrians LOL
<I leverage the gooder Jew's theory against the obsessed jew's theory, how could you tell? №2719812[Quote]
>>2719801powerfulmises67 glad you're back
№2719816[Quote]
>>2719812Sometimes I feel like a tourist to this site even though I have been here since Nov 24.
I just don't visit too often, good to see you
№2719819[Quote]
Whenever all the threads are gore or softcore porn I just abstain from the board at all
№2719821[Quote]
>>2719816good to see you aswell
№2719875[Quote]
>>2719856I see NuAnCaps every day.. powerful stuff
№2719912[Quote]
>>2719801>These people are majority white, I'll admit, but blacks or any other race following NAP can be in this society, and uniquely can be excluded as soon as this condition is no longer true.Just because there are rare exception to the rule and in some abstract society the NAP can indeed work among mystery-meat mutts. But just because it (hypothetically) "can" work does mean that we should. We also can exclude niggers and non-niggers from society not because they are more likely than not to be a NOT exception to the rule (which they are), but because we simply do not want to see shitskin niggers in our neighbourhood and we have full right and power to NOT allow non-whites within the privately owned borders of our ethno-ancapistan. We don't like shitskin niggers here, nigger.
>The NAP has developed from the high trust society of America and elsewhere.True and it only developed among the ethno-kin of same race/culture people, i.e. WHITES only society. And such societies, i.e. tribes in the past were formed through the Free Market of the Natural Order, i.e. Evolution.
№2719934[Quote]
>>2719912The good in AnCap is: Society is no longer a inclusion-forced unified mold. You can create your own white society. Liberal societies which accept mystery meat mutts will collapse and they will flee to other countries, since nearby communities that aren't liberals won't want refugees. Probably THE only good about socialists and liberals trying to make societies in an AnCap society is a constant flow of sold property after their shit ideology fails, although that might artificially alter the market.
Also not a nigger
This debate is immaterial because if you want to live in a white society, there's no amount of moral argumentation that will prove if x y or z amount of browns can be included and have a beneficial effect, and where the balance is tipped. That's a part of the good of this.
№2719979[Quote]
>>2719934>>2719912the most important point here is that bleeding heart lolberts are retards and that hoppean covenant communities are ARYAN,
voluntary means truly voluntary
№2720035[Quote]
>>2719934Stubborn socialist countries are good ground for anarchy also, since they are too retarded to realise that the state capitalism of
(((planned economy))) will NEVER work, they will just impoverish the state so much that it cant sustain itself and collapse under its own retarded policies and officials no longer get passive income of national money to continue to care (see: somali, ussr, some other asian and african shitholes that were partnof socialist experiments). Sadly, most countries leaders realise that it cannot work like that and turn into fascism like china and now even nk transform into.
>>2719979>bleeding heart lolbertsNever heard this term before, what does it mean?
№2720079[Quote]
>>2720035bleeding heart libertarians are progressives who really want social justice and inclusion of niggers in their community (guns for troon nigger couples who grow weed), its pretty retarded
№2720087[Quote]
>>2720079it isn't JUST this, its also the un opposition of the Civil Rights Act because if you are a libertarian or ancap you SHOULD oppose the civil rights act for the restriction of freedom of association that it is
№2720132[Quote]
>>2720087trve, i kind of forgot about this because i floated away to theoryland for a second
№2720137[Quote]
>but if we use the government,
>how will we stop people from using it against us
can someone explain what this even means?
№2720171[Quote]
>>2720137Retarded strawman, means that we shouldnt aim ourselves to de-centralised society because centralised government will get us all killed.
№2720172[Quote]
>>2719651lolberts argue and behave in the same way commies do. you won't get through to xim
№2720225[Quote]
>>2720171>we shouldnt aim ourselves to de-centralised society because centralised government will get us all killedisnt the point to get rid of the centralized government, and then after that do whatever? so the cartoons argument is saying, we're going to die anyway if we dont become a centralized government? so by them agreeing on something, are their hand going to be untied, and are they going to be able to run away, because they agree to something? no. it doesnt make sense.
№2720231[Quote]
libertarianism is caca because it doesnt allow me to kill everyone i dont like and implement eugenics
№2720443[Quote]
>>2720225No. Rothbard argued that we should SLOWLY replace all of the state institutions with privately owned ones or at least destroy the monopoly on them (example, being able to choose only certain institutions where your tax money goes), but mostly to replace the government with voluntarily formed covenant of proprietor and community tenants, not that we should abandon ALL institutions, especially the ones that provide the borders for said privately owned covenant.
The logical fallacy in the cartoon suggests that all libertarians are individualists, i.e. by themselves alone, and wouldnt unite together even in the upcoming danger of united enemy approaching and killing libertarians one by one (or perhaps it just mocks THESE type of libertarians). The fallacy is that the fatass meximutt furnigger faggot (not a single word is a baseless insult) who drew this cartoon does not address nor taken into acvount the very principle of libertarianism and that is
Freedom of Association , i.e. all libertarian order is built upon volunteer cooperation and high-trust society - it is unironically Syndicalism, except gommies only argue it is for muh labour union to replace muh capitalism. So in other words, realistically if libertarians form a "government", i.e. =covenant concluded among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property= , in times of imminent dangerbwhen commie government want to strike you, you can make it an obligation among proprietor and community tenants to United against common enemy OR they will be kicked, i.em physically removed for being a cowardly traitor.
Nigger its not a rocket science.
№2720618[Quote]
>>2720443>and he suddenly became silent after I explained this >>2720225nigga could at least thank me if I explained it well, or say that you got it, or argued more against it.
№2720644[Quote]
>>2720618Statists will never understand this
№2720654[Quote]
>>2718949 (OP)It is spiritually homosexual to expect the government to provide you a house, an income, healthcare, an education, and purpose in life, rather expecting the government to protect your ability to pursue those things for yourself.
№2720682[Quote]
>>2720654Anyway you haven't given any type of valid argument except projecting homosexuality. It would be great if everyone always pursued what is best for them and everyone around them at all times but that's not realistic.
№2720693[Quote]
>>2720654Gigatrvke spiritual revelation that made balkan shitskin seethe for no reason.
№2720697[Quote]
>>2720443>danger of united enemy approaching and killing libertarians one by onethey can go live in alaska, they can live in greenland, montana, idaho, theres places for them to go. northdakota.. and so on.
№2720741[Quote]
>>2720443This sounds nice until some Somali scammer deceives some retard living in a libertarian kibbutz from 39 communes away
№2720792[Quote]
>>2720697I don't get the pursuit of saying this to me. Are you implying commies/zog government wouldnt be arsed to attack literal ice-cube lands if chuddies migrated there?
I am afraid not, the kikes really don't want the whites to be united, not having niggers around, not paying taxes to fund shitsrael killing other semite shitskins, and just having a peaceful land of ethno-nationalism without
(((them))) interventing, even if they live by the law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siegeThe kikes will do anything to make sure to eliminate such embryos of formations of ethno-centrist villages or even houses. And if you get too popular to a point your movement get a motion, they wouldnt hesitate to use violence and even black ops operation to eliminate every single chudcel without a court, and label you as cult of evil 764 o9a f**dist nazi chudcels to justify your genocide so normgroid htsm nusoi society would not question it and wholeheartedly believe that you deserved because they are retarded npcs.
So I believe it is important to unite, especially militarily, to eventually scare off feds and their infiltrators; and meanwhile enter your local preparation groups in case shit is about to get worse to train yourself for worst outcome.
№2720851[Quote]
>>2720741>implying the scam-market will work after the mighty ((($))) is no longer centralisedat this point both parties of both "communas" must partake in tradeship contract agreement to follow certain rules, duties and obligations (such as punishing the scamers when busted) to even maintain tradeship routes, and if either side does not maintain their obligations they they violate the NAP and send them McNuke (realistically they will just stop trusting them and cancel tradeship, which will be a huge loss for both. This is why they will also spread the word to other "communas" about scamers (and their inaction to punish them) and send sanctions their way, or whole embargo id the scam was massive). Nobody likes untrusted tribes.
№2720854[Quote]
>>2720792>Are you implying commies/zog government wouldnt be arsed to attack literal ice-cube lands if chuddies migrated there?Commies had something called "siberia" and other shit hole countries in the ussr far away. thats what apalachia, and all those states i named, are looked at as. we want those kind of people there.
№2720865[Quote]
>>2720854Idaho and Alaska are comfy, I wouldnt want commies there
№2720870[Quote]
the commies are going to have to go to south america or maybe politically steal some border towns. i dont know.
№2720918[Quote]
>>2720870Send all gommies, leftists, anarcho-leftists, etc to North Korea. I am pretty sure Kim wouldn't mind more slaves working on his field, meanwhile feltoids will experience the REEEAAAL socialism.
№2720942[Quote]
>>2720918if they want to go there, they can. but why cant they go to south america? theres nothing we need there.