ā2696125[Quote]
>>2696018>You need to think of it on economic terms. Capitalism inherently opposes this by making it so the only way most of society can fulfill their needs is through labor.There are always jobs, if there are no jobs then there is no money and thus there is no profit.
Furthermore, the time you spend in your job is mostly spent wwith people you know, which do not care about your skills in labour
>Once again, the car and the horse. Automation does not magically make jobs appear out of thin air - and even when it does, the jobs it creates are often not enough to match those destroyed. Is it easier to hire 1 engineer that mantains a machine, or 100 workers to manually do the thing the machine does?It is impossible to maintain a society which does not progress if there are societis around you that do progress, if you do try to maintain it then then the more advanced society will just destroy your less advanced society. While it is true that small scale "stuck in the past" societies (like the amish) are able to prosper, they still need someone who protects them from the ones who would try to destory them. While i wish everyone would just stop making new useless inventions, It is impossible to crete a civilistion on that, And you need remember that restricting peoples ability too create something new is kinda bad, imagine that you create a perpetual motion machine but you can't produce it becouse "duh governmunt said you cant creatuh becouse that destroyuhs teh jobs"
ā2696147[Quote]
>>2696111pooner poster PLEASE IM BEGGING YOU CAN I RAPE YOU SISA
ā2696160[Quote]
>>2696158>azerbaijanYour country isn't even real kys
ā2696208[Quote]
>>2696125>There are always jobs, if there are no jobs then there is no money and thus there is no profit.>Furthermore, the time you spend in your job is mostly spent wwith people you know, which do not care about your skills in labourI never said jobs are going to disappear. There's just going to be less of them. Your second claim has nothing to do with how people meet their needs.
>It is impossible to maintain a society which does not progress if there are societis around you that do progress, if you do try to maintain it then then the more advanced society will just destroy your less advanced society. While it is true that small scale "stuck in the past" societies (like the amish) are able to prosper, they still need someone who protects them from the ones who would try to destory them. While i wish everyone would just stop making new useless inventions, It is impossible to crete a civilistion on that, And you need remember that restricting peoples ability too create something new is kinda bad, imagine that you create a perpetual motion machine but you can't produce it becouse "duh governmunt said you cant creatuh becouse that destroyuhs teh jobs"Progress is not bad. However the benefits it brings have to be distributed to everyone, and not just those at the top.
Automation is not inherently bad, but it becomes so when the people who are laid off are given no other opportunity that is at least equal to their prior position.
>>2696135You didn't even read it.
>>2696156Leak.
ā2696212[Quote]
>>2696208alunya poster PLEASE IM BEGGING YOU CAN I RAPE YOU SISA
ā2696214[Quote]
You can simply decline to entertain this creature
ā2696217[Quote]
>>2696208stop ignoring me i know you are scared i will find you anyway and bring the frenchman with me
ā2696223[Quote]
>>2696214I always have actual conversations with them, I like them I think they are a refreshing change up to what is regularly posted here
ā2696224[Quote]
>>2696160Cuckgod won
Azerbaijan won
ā2696228[Quote]
>>2696224cuckgod WON but azerbaijan lost though
ā2696240[Quote]
>>2696236Unironically this
ā2696244[Quote]
>>2696236shes right you know
ā2696250[Quote]
>>2696244Saskatroons lost
ā2696252[Quote]
>>2696250azerbaijaniggers lost
ā2696275[Quote]
>>2696236alunya poster PLEASE IM BEGGING YOU CAN I RAPE YOU SISA
ā2696294[Quote]
>I never said jobs are going to disappear. There's just going to be less of them. Your second claim has nothing to do with how people meet their needs.
There will not be less jobs, Quite the opposite, With more technology there is more types of jobs created, Just the creation of the internet created a shit ton of jobs, the same with computers, and etc.
>Automation is not inherently bad, but it becomes so when the people who are laid off are given no other opportunity that is at least equal to their prior position.
Yes it is, But that rarely happens, as i said earlier, High unemployment creates a deficit of money for companies. Also when a person gets fired, another company might try to employ them becoue of their work knowledge and becouse they are already trained.
That is the also the point of education, so if you do get fired you still have an option to get hired by someone.
ā2696299[Quote]
>>2696214These discussions are interesting doie
ā2696341[Quote]
Test
ā2696343[Quote]
>>2696095Where can I learn more about this?
ā2696369[Quote]
>>2696343I learnt this through Dr Hubermans podcast, I'm sure there are several resources online outlining the function of this brain area.
Dr huberman is a renowned neuroscientist, not some random guy btw.
https://archive.org/details/youtube-Wv07LRtbwncThis will have some information
ā2696372[Quote]
>>2696369It might have been this episode actually, I don't think he's ever gone indept on fetishes
ā2696412[Quote]
>>2696294>There will not be less jobs, Quite the opposite, With more technology there is more types of jobs created, Just the creation of the internet created a shit ton of jobs, the same with computers, and etc.Automation is not the same as technology/innovation. Automation almost always leads to less jobs.
But you make an interesting point there that technology can open up new fields of employment. However, I believe that this is not a solid foundation to build on, as it doesn't ALWAYS lead to more jobs, and the current trend in the near future is automation and the reduction of jobs (AI, for example). As such, as part of the proletariat, I'd rather prefer to knock down this unstable system than to hope for technology to MAYBE bring more jobs in the future.
>Yes it is, But that rarely happens, as i said earlier, High unemployment creates a deficit of money for companies. Also when a person gets fired, another company might try to employ them becoue of their work knowledge and becouse they are already trained.High unemployment doesn't lead to less money for an individual company in any way, unless what you mean is that it leads to a reduction in demand, in which case it is true, but it is nothing an individual company can hope to fix (btw, this is one of the ways lolbertarianism fails). Also, regarding your other point: this only applies if the company in question fired you because you didn't fit their specific needs, but when they fire you because of a systemic trend in that entire field of work, then there is no reason another company of the same field would hire you.
>That is the also the point of education, so if you do get fired you still have an option to get hired by someone.Well, education costs money and time. And currently, the worldwide trend in economics is that jobs are getting more scarce in all fields, not just a few.
ā2696434[Quote]
>>2696412You're so lucky she's such a cute commie, otherwise I'd spam dnb in your threads
ā2696475[Quote]
>>2696459It's not about that silly
It's meant to derail no one cares that much about being edgy on here
She's just such eye candy, I'd never want to ruin the association by spamming dead niggers. This is why gore isn't spammed in your threads anyway, have you not realised that yet?
ā2696491[Quote]
>>2696486projection
you look like this and say this because you posted this
ā2696507[Quote]
White people are God's true chosen
ā2696511[Quote]
>>2696491sadly i look like that
ā2696576[Quote]
>>2696412> I believe that this is not a solid foundation to build on, as it doesn't ALWAYS lead to more jobs, and the current trend in the near future is automation and the reduction of jobs (AI, for example).I believ that in the Future most of the jobs will be manual labour jobs and Intellectual Jobs as they cannot be automated, i think that there Will be a sort of a pittfall inbeetwen the jobs of those people who do much (workers that work in the coal mines, manual workers Blue-Collar Jobs) Middle point Jobs (restaurant workers, delivery drivers, part-time workers, eentertainment) and Totall Intelectual jobs (book writing, management, High positions in corporations)
I'd say that most "calculating" jobs will be useless and will be replaced by computers, which will bring back Classes like in the beggining of the 20th century
>High unemployment doesn't lead to less money for an individual company in any way, unless what you mean is that it leads to a reduction in demand, in which case it is true, but it is nothing an individual company can hope to fix (btw, this is one of the ways lolbertarianism fails). Also, regarding your other point: this only applies if the company in question fired you because you didn't fit their specific needs, but when they fire you because of a systemic trend in that entire field of work, then there is no reason another company of the same field would hire you. yes but the more workers a company has the more efficiently it can run and thus create more profit
>Well, education costs money and time. And currently, the worldwide trend in economics is that jobs are getting more scarce in all fields, not just a few.That's why education is free, While it is true that more companies are becoming more strict on minimal education you need to have to be employed, it is mostly thee fault of people not getting the right degree, It is obvious that a degree in "natural spring tea making" is not gonna be usefull for a corporation specialised in selling cars
ā2696611[Quote]
can anybody post alunya brap gemmies here
ā2696625[Quote]
>>2696617Goodnight, sleep well