â„–2609143[Quote]
Aryan.
â„–2609176[Quote]
>>2609155Might be the most faggot reason to like joeyy of all time
â„–2609207[Quote]
>>2609193Do you know about that one Orthodox priest who makes metal music, he goes by Paterikon.
â„–2609222[Quote]
>>2609122 (OP)just go to church bro; i think "Christian Music" is cringy
â„–2609224[Quote]
>>2609222I do, I also dont exclusively listen to Christian music, i just made this thread to oppositefag
â„–2609232[Quote]
The way I view it is if the music is good I'll listen to it, and if they happen to also be Christian that's a plus but it ain't a deal maker or breaker.
â„–2609247[Quote]
>>2609207Was he involved in the Death to the World magazine? Or is it someone different?
â„–2609250[Quote]
>>2609247Idk pray to the bbc in the sky and maybe it will give you a blacked revelation
â„–2609270[Quote]
>>2609250Why so mindbroken?
â„–2609275[Quote]
>>2609270 God isn't real. There is no value to a false belief system, in fact, it only leads to chaos when the ethics are rug pulled and the masses realize that they have been living a lie for their entire lives.
â„–2609278[Quote]
â„–2609281[Quote]
>>2609275THC binds primarily to CB1 receptors in the brain.
These receptors are abundant in areas that regulate hormone secretion such as the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. By activating or inhibiting these receptors, marijuana can influence the release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). GnRH controls luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), which in turn regulate testosterone production by the testes.
Disruption at any point along this chain can shift the delicate balance between testosterone and estrogen.
For example:
Lowered LH can reduce testosterone synthesis.
Reduced testosterone may lead to an increased conversion to estrogen via aromatase enzymes.
Cannabinoids might directly affect aromatase activity or estrogen receptor sensitivity
â„–2609283[Quote]
>>2609278Stfu about it then pussy. You leak so hard about what other people believe. But you hate something you claim doesn't exist.
â„–2609289[Quote]
>>2609283Drugs turned him into homosexual
The next step will be a transvestite
We should pray for him
â„–2609292[Quote]
>>2609283I hate Christians because they twist reality to fit their delusions and then proceed to not follow any of the ethics of the religion they claim exists. Religion and hypocrisy go hand in hand.
â„–2609297[Quote]
>>2609292You're a fat retard bro stfu.
â„–2609301[Quote]
>>2609292Wow I want to explode on you even more. But instead im just going to close this thread.
I hope you find God and help.
â„–2609302[Quote]
>>2609297Delusional hypocrite
â„–2609304[Quote]
>>2609303OK. Think that all you want.
â„–2609305[Quote]
>>2609304I know there is no god
â„–2609306[Quote]
>>2609297post physique then
â„–2609307[Quote]
>>2609305@grok add an israel flag and Indian flag to this photo and add Netanyahu and add the words AI Art Won and a burning trans flag and the phrase you will never be a woman
â„–2609311[Quote]
There is no god because we made it up lol. We're nothing more than animals and the sooner you accept that the sooner you won't be afraid of death
â„–2609313[Quote]
>>2609305You cant know something DOESNT exist. Especially something detailed the way it is within the bible.
â„–2609316[Quote]
>>2609176god forbid a nigga make a joke or two
â„–2609319[Quote]
>>2609313so you can't claim that other religions are false either, and not doing so is against your doctrine
â„–2609321[Quote]
>>2609311I guess I only hallucinated 3 times in the 30 years ive been alive then. 3 very specific visual and auditory, that pushed me ALONE to converting, right on the brink of suicide. Right?
â„–2609322[Quote]
>>2609317
I hate glocks, they are ugly
â„–2609323[Quote]
>>2609313You just lied about going to bed you're going to burn in your own mental prison of hell. It's incredible how you Christ cucks try to make everybody else fear your kike on a stick for no reason other than to win an argument. There is no god, you lied about leaving, and you're full of shit.
â„–2609324[Quote]
>>2609319I claim the other religions worship devil.
â„–2609330[Quote]
>>2609324still contradictory, because you are claiming they don't worship what they say so, but the devil
â„–2609331[Quote]
>>2609330I believe you are confusing me with someone esle
â„–2609335[Quote]
>>2609333>you are claiming they don't worship what they say soI havent said this. False religions worship false gods (fallen angels/devils/demons), i dont deny this.
â„–2609341[Quote]
>>2609335the other religions don't believe that their gods are false. so saying they are is the same as denying the existence of them, because "they are the devil in disguise" instead
â„–2609354[Quote]
>>2609341Oh, thats what you mean. Its a language thing.
So, all other kinds of "gods" outside of the abrahamic religions are by their very definitions are 'weaker', not omnipresent, not omnipotent, not omniscient, etc, they are the sun god, thunder god whatever.
In my definition of the word God, it ought to be THE ultimate, period.
The definitions of the paganistic gods fall right into the territory of the powers and bodies that angels/fallen angels (devils demons) literally possess.
When I say false, this is what I mean. What they worship is a thing, but not the ultimate thing. Make sense?
â„–2609364[Quote]
>>2609356Evil is the absence of God.
â„–2609373[Quote]
>>2609354but you didn't said that they worship a thing, but the devil
>>2609324. also, this meaning of false doesn't make sense. they never claimed their gods are the "ultimate thing," so there is no lie, no false statement, in saying, for exemple, the god of wine's dionysus. unless you say that no, in fact dionysus is not what's told, but the devil in disguise. and that would fall into contradiction with your statement that nothing can't be proven that doesn't exist
â„–2609375[Quote]
>>2609364you can't prove that evil doesn't exists either, by your own argument
â„–2609378[Quote]
>>2609354and the gods looks very similar with angels, demons and martyrs because catholicism appropriated their representations. little of "a thing's entity" exists in the bible
â„–2609381[Quote]
Fo back to 4cuck
â„–2609388[Quote]
>>2609373>but you didn't said that they worship a thing, but the devilCorrect, it is and isnt a by proxy sort of think.
Think of it like this, if im a Texan, am I a american? Yes. If I worship molech, then I am also worshipping molechs master, the adversary, Satan.
>also, this meaning of false doesn't make sense. they never claimed their gods are the "ultimate thing," Thats very clearly not what I said.
>>2609375Evil is the absence of God.
>>2609378Nordic, Egyptian, hindu and so on, apply to principalities and powers, they align greatly with Enochs descriptions. And the many Arabic descriptions.
â„–2609395[Quote]
>>2609378They can also literally shapeshift. So this doesnt matter anyways.
â„–2609402[Quote]
>>2609373The English language is not at all as concrete as people think. Dictionaries might as well be fake.
â„–2609406[Quote]
>>2609388>Correct, it is and isnt a by proxy sort of think. Think of it like this, if im a Texan, am I a american? Yes. If I worship molech, then I am also worshipping molechs master, the adversary, Satan.
still, you are denying the existence of the original identity of the god
>Thats very clearly not what I said.of course it's not, I used as an exemple of what would make the meaning of false used in your reply make sense
>Evil is the absence of God.you used it as a counter-argument to the starting point of epicurean paradox: evil exists. so necessarily you are stating that evil doesn't exists per se. that way, you're denying the existence of evil, falling into contradiction
â„–2609423[Quote]
>>2609406>still, you are denying the existence of the original identity of the godWhat do you mean?
>of course it's notI was defining the words I was using so you could understand me. Calling fallen angels gods is untrue. By your definition, if I call myself a god, I magically am one.
>you are stating that evil doesn'tI am not. I am saying, evil exists only when God is absent.
â„–2609443[Quote]
>>2609423>What do you mean?in the original identity of the god, he's no "fallen angel" in disguise, or a servant of devil. saying that things is denying the existence of it, an entity independent of christian theology
>I was defining the words I was using so you could understand me. Calling fallen angels gods is untrue. By your definition, if I call myself a god, I magically am one.god is a concept independent of any religion. you are using the christian definition of it to call others false, what implies that, again, an entity independent of christian theology doesn't exist. and a god is defined by the culture of a folk, so if you call yourself one, you aren't one
>I am not. I am saying, evil exists only when God is absent.the argument of evil being the absence of god is the same as cold being the absence of heat. in physics, cold's a sensation, doesn't exists per se. heat does. so when you say evil is this absence, you are denying the existence of evil per se, as an entity, element, essence or whatever
â„–2609453[Quote]
>>2609443Burh we are in the same timezone, how are you so amped for a deep convo like this?
>entity independent of christian theologyMy point is that non is independent.
>same as cold being the absence of heat…. thats exactly how science defines it…
â„–2609457[Quote]
>>2609453>Burh we are in the same timezone, how are you so amped for a deep convo like this?I'm a night guy
>My point is that non is independent.I know, and this automatically negates the existence of the independent
>thats exactly how science defines it…yes? did you read the rest?
â„–2609459[Quote]
>>2609457>I know, and this automatically negates the existence of the independentPrecisely. Nothing is outside the reign of the almighty.
>yes? did you read the rest?No..
>evil per se, as an entity, element, essence or whateverEvil is a choice, a action, that can only exist when God is not present. Someone does evil, humans do evil. If we exclude all spirituality, and then erase humanity from the earth, in base nature, what evil happens? None. No murders, no theft, no rape, and so on.
â„–2609471[Quote]
>>2609457Please also dont rely on me for correct theological understanding. There are men who spend their whole lives studying this topic..
â„–2609477[Quote]
>>2609459>Precisely. Nothing is outside the reign of the almighty.so you're denying the existence of something, falling into contradiction
>Evil is a choice, a action, that can only exist when God is not present.you're still confirming the existence of evil, just giving it a condition. the right argument is it being just an absence, which is not the same as condition. but ok, talking about the later, I ask: how can there be an absence if god's omnipresent? and your answer is, or should be: free will. and I ask again: where does come from the evil intentions of humans, or even fallen angels? the knowledge of good and evil, the forbidden fruit, you say. but how? so evil does exist? per se? because how can you "know" just an absence of something, even without the absence of it in the moment?
>If we exclude all spirituality, and then erase humanity from the earth, in base nature, what evil happens? None. No murders, no theft, no rape, and so on.animals from all kinds can be very "evil," don't you think? mothers eating some of their offspring, one brutally killing other. but it's just to eat, you say. yeah, what about an occasional cannibalism? most christians would condemn that atitute, even in survival context