â„–2599422[Quote]
Yeah around 1968 the US switched from manned space exploration to funding infinite black people and indians
â„–2599429[Quote]
each improvement is part of the invention process
â„–2599432[Quote]
>>2599413 (OP)in the last 50 years, the sharty was invented, computers and phones, nintendo switches, playstaion and soylent, the internet and wifi, and AI
â„–2599452[Quote]
your literally typing this on an invention from the last 50 years
â„–2599464[Quote]
>>2599429I mean no invitations on new fields.
Imagine a person seeing airplane for the first time? It was a new meta.
Right now matter transporting would be the equivalent of this meta.
You understand what I am trying to say? I am ESL I used all my English to this post nigga please understand
>>2599432All improvement of already existing things
â„–2599465[Quote]
>>2599464airplanes have consistently improved since its invention. the first airplane is closer to a paper one than to a modern boeing
â„–2599472[Quote]
>>2599467nusois cant smell perfumes or imagine the taste of a meal
â„–2599473[Quote]
>>2599465Yes and it was ground breaking back then right now it's a normal thing.
The equivalent if this ground breaking is teleporting o algo
â„–2599482[Quote]
>>2599422Each time I remember that Whties could've had a space colony but they stuck on earth because the USA spent the money to feed starving niggers I laugh
â„–2599486[Quote]
>>2599429This is reddit. Incremental improvement is not true invention. There actually are great leaps which strike the human imagination like a lightning bolt. Not everything is grinding slow progress.
>>2599452Not really, the fundamental inventions of the computer were all demoed in the 1960s and 70s. There really haven't been any truly new things for a long time. The old copes get less and less credible as the decades pile up. There was a real change.
â„–2599492[Quote]
>>2599482Geg yeah… The Marshall plan rebuilt Europe after the two most destructive wars of all human history. Since 1965, the US has spent the equivalent of 50 Marshall plans in Africa and they are still starving and have no running water and die of prehistoric tropical diseases, and all the infrastructure bought and built crumbles to dust in a generation or less. I can appreciate that this is funny from a third perspective
â„–2599501[Quote]
>>2599486yes it is invention. for example, a welding tool once started out as a simple electric arc with a battery and it slowly evolved into Stick, TIG, and MIG welding as well as its various other forms
â„–2599503[Quote]
>>2599501You aren't getting it and you aren't ever going to
â„–2599505[Quote]
>>2599501Also welding was not originally electric, you don't even know that. People welded metals in the bronze age
â„–2599507[Quote]
>>2599492That's the funny thing.
>When your people arrived in Africa there were more wilde animals than peopleThe total nigger population was less than 80 million in the entire continent.
>They are still starvingGeg
There natural number is less than 80 million and even then they were starving.
I have no doubt thay if all whties left Africa and a sage happend there at least 1.35 Billion nigger will die in less than a decade leading only&best 50 million
â„–2599517[Quote]
>>2599501>Invitation is to bulid thing that never been bulite beforeI am a brown ESL and I understood his concept more than you fucking nigger
â„–2599521[Quote]
>>2599507Yeah… and the glut population has basically devoured the entire megafauna of Africa… The only remnants of the wonders before the last ice age. Australia used to be another refuge before the aboriginals literally burned the entire continent down over and over and over again (it was their preferred hunting method). Africa will someday be similar.
Once the foreign white bulwark stops propping up the excess population (either by choice or by decay) then the famine time will basically annihilate countless biomes forever.
â„–2599522[Quote]
>>2599517if i invented a brick, you would call that something that already existed since we would already have wood and straw houses
â„–2599527[Quote]
>>2599523ok perhaps maybe my definition of a invention is wrong let me go search it up rq
â„–2599530[Quote]
>A new device, method, or process developed from study and experimentation.
>"the phonograph, an invention attributed to Thomas Edison."
blackpilling i guess you guys are right
â„–2599531[Quote]
yeah maybe im just a little dumb and i confused invention with innovation
â„–2599532[Quote]
>>2599527A definition wouldn't help you, you have no basic concept of inspiration or the act of conception of a new idea. You won't be able to learn that from anything or anyone.
â„–2599536[Quote]
>>2599532Most people can't do this. I'm no inventor obviously. But there are great people you can read about who were able to see new things invisible to all others, it's real. Or it once was anyway
â„–2599540[Quote]
>>2599537Don't you have some yaoi to read
â„–2599544[Quote]
>>2599527Ships been invented 2500 years ago, no matter how much you make it better it's the same concept, something that carry people through the sea.
If you invinted new brick however it would be different, is your new bricks can keep heat? Can it stand the rain?
Bricks dosn't just serve as houses materials for a single purpose.
So yes I would call it new invention
â„–2599550[Quote]
>>2599413 (OP)DNA modification, nuclear fushion, microchip(its an advancement like going from a carriage to a sportscar), cloning, ghost particle detection, AI.
â„–2599552[Quote]
>>2599530If it use the same concept and method then yes, it's for Edson.
Can you call a phone a brand new technology? No, because computer ships invited along ago before that
â„–2599553[Quote]
>>2599532>>2599536my career is literally about inventing and solving problems though am i cooked
>>2599544id say a steel ship is its own invention compared to a wooden ship. a steel ship has many different parts that have had to been engineered to tackle its issues.
<even then, the varieties of wooden boats such as a canoe or a grand sailing ship represent different problems that each inventor and engineer had to tackle
â„–2599556[Quote]
>>2599467>theres nothing new invented in the past half century>posts thought above on the internet>takes a photo on digital camera>uses touch screen pocket computer phone to use a ridesharing service >uses barcode scanner at self checkout at store>instant messages friends and family >walks past billions of microprocessors and thousands of lithium-ion batteries these things might not feel revolutionary because they improve convenience rather than survival and are so blended into everyday life, but their impact is just as important, if not more so in some ways, as the industrial revolution.
>>2599486an invention cant just be conceivable, it has to be practical and transformative. same process in which people discredit the likes of Thomas Edison, inventions arn't just its conception and Microvariant is very much correct about that. with computers becoming available and used by the general public, beyond a few hundred researchers and experts at a few colleges, the true invovation of network computer were creater: global coordination, digital surveillance, social media, gig economies, etc. it is ignorant to act like none of this is part of invention. to reduce invention to demos or initial thoughts dismissed pretty much every invention
>the Wright brothers didn't invent flight because da Vinci sketched a gliderif you want to be nihilistic about inventions, dont look at whether they exist or not, and look at the repercussions of them
â„–2599558[Quote]
>>2599540it's open in the other tab
â„–2599559[Quote]
>>2599544My favorite example of a truly novel invention is Tesla (not the most original but he's a good one) inventing the AC electric motor. The idea struck him from the ether, almost fully-formed, incredibly abstract and unlike other concepts. True innovation is like the moment of literal conception, the birth of a thing, not like stacking more blocks upon a foundation of other blocks
â„–2599563[Quote]
>>2599550Non of these are 100% finished or available for all
>AINo mattre how hard it seem to be, AI is simply 1 and 0.
Eventually with all the memory and shit it still 1 and 0 this is why even some childerns tricked it to and that chud on Xitter made Grok says he hates nigger.
â„–2599564[Quote]
>>2599556great perspective
â„–2599565[Quote]
>>2599553No, you're not cooked, I'm talking about an exceptional class of people, less than one percent of one percent of anyone who ever lived. It's fine to not be that guy but it's bad to deny he exists, at least in my opinion
â„–2599566[Quote]
>>2599563id say that inventing something with 1s and 0s is still a invention. game engines and art softwares and CAD products are each their own small inventions that do so much for the world
â„–2599570[Quote]
>>2599566We can check back when we are all old men in idk 2060 or so and see if there have been any big new things or if we're all still basically grasping for the imaginations of people in the 1940s
â„–2599573[Quote]
>>2599570theres a tangible difference from the 1940s and the 2020s; what is your point?
â„–2599574[Quote]
>>2599556It's all an improvements for the computer chop that been invited way before we were born o algo
>>2599559Yes this consider to be an invention, somethin that serve entire new purpose beside, even doe the motors been invinted way before him and he didn't discoveres Freon but the idea of a combining these things made a new invention
â„–2599585[Quote]
>>2599573Meeeeh
Everything we have today was already dreamed in the 1940s. We have no equivalent dreams for eighty years hence. We can't even conceive of where we want to go.
â„–2599588[Quote]
>>2599566Yes but still, it's an extension for something before it, for the first computer chip to be invited.
It's like making an airplane that can travel 100000km in hour, is it a new thing?
>YesBut is it a completely new invention?
No, it's an improvement on an invention that already existed before.
>>2599585I am going now bro
See you all later
â„–2599594[Quote]
>>2599585i dont think that a mere thought equates to the full realization of a product. if someone thought of a spaceship in the 1940s, it would only be a fulfilled reality if they worked on it in the 1960s.
>>2599588i think we have the same idea but we are just wording it differently and thats our issue. anyways see you later
â„–2599599[Quote]
>>2599574just stand back for a minute and think about the fact that you are currently instantly messaging and having a conversation with people who are on the other side of the globe from you, something that wasnt possible until like 30 years ago. of course tons of shit were invented before we were born, half this site's users are probably younger than the first iPhone.
â„–2599601[Quote]
>>2599594Perhaps but it's certainly a prerequisite. We have everything we have now because of the thoughts of people back then, but we don't really have a game plan for the future beyond "everything is computer"
â„–2599604[Quote]
>>2599589>>2599594Maybe because I am ESL
See around chuds
â„–2599605[Quote]
>>2599599Near-instant global communication is absolutely older than 30
â„–2599609[Quote]
>>2599594>wording it differentlyYeah I am thinking that too and maybe it's because it is inherently a kind of semantic idea.. The difference between taking the next step in a long journey and taking your very first step. Idk I'm no poet
â„–2599617[Quote]
>>2599605the WWW was invented in 1989. if you wanna get pedantic, sure email and private networks existed, but those are clearly different in purpose, impact, and design, than something like this forum or modern social media.
â„–2599624[Quote]
i swear cold fusion could be invented tomorrow and some of you would go "so its like an extension of nuclear energy or something? seen it before."
â„–2599634[Quote]
>>2599601theres still stuff that is mechanical that gets improved every-so-often. i cant give a straight example but yk what i mean
â„–2599643[Quote]
>>2599617Social media/internet/obsessive navel-gazing digital world is perhaps the one and only contender for a truly new thing that was developed in the past fifty years. But radio operators had similar things in analog. The innovation is that those people were huge nerds and autists, and now everyone is
â„–2599644[Quote]
>>2599624Nah if cold fusion was invented tomorrow I would immediately stand up and throw a Roman salute so hard my knuckles would pop
â„–2599650[Quote]
>>2599643>Social media/internet/obsessive navel-gazing digital worldfunny how these are the things stopping such innovation
â„–2599654[Quote]
>>2599650Or rather funneling the same creative energies into useless fake dimensions
â„–2599661[Quote]
but… my wholeseom iphone and badthink meds didnt exist in 2000…
â„–2599710[Quote]
>>2599675Going into the shartypol screenshot hall of fame folder
â„–2599766[Quote]
>>2599521what are you so scared about ? we have genetic engineering literally we could reshape the fundamental principles of life if it weren't for
(((ethics))) â„–2599794[Quote]
Flasenvke