â„–2586808[Quote]
Obsessed
â„–2586810[Quote]
>>2586809Agrarianism lost btw
â„–2586811[Quote]
>>2586809Agrarianism won btw hope this helps
â„–2586813[Quote]
>>2586810Why so obsessed…. Agrarianism won. Corporatism won too.
>>2586811tis
â„–2586816[Quote]
>>2586813If thats the case then ok
â„–2586818[Quote]
>>2586816Nigga what made you think agrarianism is against corporatism
â„–2586819[Quote]
>>2586814But he is le upside down implying le hanging
â„–2586821[Quote]
>>2586818Idk I know you like agrarianism and I wanted to bait you or something because le funni
â„–2586822[Quote]
>>2586818>>2586817National Socialist economics won
â„–2586823[Quote]
>>2586819I like 'lini and I think the upside down jokes are funny
â„–2586824[Quote]
>>2586821ok stop baiting me or I'll call my buddies at mossad
>>2586822Hey Rolf, got any resources on this topic?
â„–2586830[Quote]
>>2586824Only german ones and only physical. I dont know if there are pdfs but I can send you some introductory material. Just give me one sec.
â„–2586831[Quote]
>>2586822Authoritarian socialism is keyed but corporate statism better
â„–2586833[Quote]
>>2586829Saar I'm perfectly sane saar
â„–2586834[Quote]
>>2586824Please don't call mossad on me saar
â„–2586835[Quote]
>>2586833How do you like him but still think the hanging jokes are funny
â„–2586842[Quote]
>>2586835Nigga he wasn't my brother I can make fun of him while liking him
â„–2586846[Quote]
>>25868301. Der Deutsche Wirtschaftsaufbau - Der Vierjahresplan Sonderausgabe by Franz Ehr
2. Mein Kampf by me
3. Der Vierjahresplan by Hermann Goring
â„–2586847[Quote]
Corporatism is losened
Whilst AVSTRIAN SCHQQL is winnered
â„–2586852[Quote]
>>2586847You couldnt even answer my basic questions yesterday. At least get a good grip on your ideological position before you larp.
â„–2586854[Quote]
>>2586846you aight yt boy thank you
â„–2586856[Quote]
>>2586852What basic question?
â„–2586859[Quote]
>>2586854Again these are all in German, idk if there is an international version.
â„–2586862[Quote]
>>2586856What happens to all the non-private property. If the state sells it, who gets it and what happens with the money.
â„–2586863[Quote]
>>2586862That's the only thing I don't know, but if it's true privatization of state property it goes to the state
â„–2586866[Quote]
>>2586863Yeah but if you want stop the state from existing you would have to do soemthing with the money, since money=power. And this would just be a very easy question, because even I know the answer to that, I have many more.
â„–2586869[Quote]
>>2586866The money would go to the people who last owned the state
â„–2586873[Quote]
>>2586869The state is owned by no one in the ideal case, it is a construct to serve the people.
The solution would be to euqally distribute the money amongst the citizens who payed taxes.
â„–2586874[Quote]
>>2586872Killing random civilians trespassing on your property?
â„–2586876[Quote]
>>2586869But my next question would be, since everything is privatized, how do you travel from point A to point B?
â„–2586877[Quote]
>>2586874yes but that's not what I mean, the State being private property itself too
â„–2586878[Quote]
>>2586859I'll see if there is a translation
â„–2586879[Quote]
>>2586876Private roads exist… , private airports exist … private bus companies exist… , private everything exist
â„–2586880[Quote]
>>2586877But that would make the state a monopoly exactly what your ideology tries to destroy?
â„–2586884[Quote]
>>2586879Yeah but one company would have to have a monopoly on them, since if there were more than one companies you would have to pay more fees to use them.
â„–2586885[Quote]
>>2586879shabbos goy mindset
â„–2586886[Quote]
>>2586884Monopolies only exist due to the goverment
â„–2586888[Quote]
>>2586886You dont understand what I mean, suppose the road you live next to is owned by one company and the next road by another one, it would be incredibly tedious and inefficient to pay these fees seperately.
â„–2586890[Quote]
>>2586886You would need to pay every company that owns roads seperately to access every road in your country, these are huge fees. It would just be like paying normal taxes but to companies.
â„–2586894[Quote]
>>2586886And monopolies can exist without the government, take a water company for example. If you try to privatize tap water, this will be incredibly shitty.
â„–2586897[Quote]
>>2586892Someone still has to manage these buildings keep them intact etc. who does it, who pays for that, by whom is it organized.
â„–2586900[Quote]
>>2586894Tere is nothing stopping you from making your own well. In Slovenia you can't make your own well without the state's permision and a bunch of regualtions etc.
â„–2586902[Quote]
A thing I have noticed, with most people having any ideology is that they dont actaully have an understanding how specific things in that economy would be regulated. This goes for communists as well as lolberts,
â„–2586905[Quote]
>>2586900Yeah but if you dissolute the state, the water is owned by someone else and you cant build a well without paying a fee to that company.
â„–2586908[Quote]
>>2586902Because they are larpers that don't even read their own books.
â„–2586914[Quote]
>>2586905Makes no sense. Water that is on your proprety is owned by you not someone else.
â„–2586920[Quote]
>>2586914That is actually not how property works, you only get the land and not the whole chunk with infinite depth and infinite height. In solvenia it is only allowed because the government was nice and decided to allow it like this.