[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ ss / craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

18+ | Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png πŸ“₯︎ (115.46 KB, 600x800) ImgOps

 β„–2565012[Quote]

There are too many people on this planet, just find a woman to love, have maybe 1 or 2 kids if you can afford it, and don't worry about the depopulation. The less people there are the better it will be for those that remain.

 β„–2565017[Quote]

Fake and gay antihuman psyop fails

 β„–2565021[Quote]

>>2565012 (OP)
Moids are dumb niggers, next question!

 β„–2565023[Quote]

so true. You should live in the pod because its good for the enviroment

 β„–2565024[Quote]

>>2565021
You getting locked up first. Ive come to the conclusion you need to be locked up first.

 β„–2565031[Quote]

>>2565024
Yipee!!!

 β„–2565053[Quote]

It's just natural selection guys the women that won't have kids will die out and the ones that do will continue the species

 β„–2565060[Quote]

>>2565012 (OP)
The pollution is not inherent to us. If we stop our obsession with infinite economic growth, that will end the decline of the earth
Even if the population of humanity decreased, the amount of things being manufactured will still increase because we expect more and more things to be made in order to raise the GDP, creating more pollution

 β„–2565081[Quote]

>>2565060
but that isn't changing. Get real. The decline in population is natural and nature will triumph over the human race.

 β„–2565100[Quote]

>>2565081
>but that isn't changing
I am not sure if it will
>The decline in population is natural and nature will triumph over the human race.
How?

 β„–2565108[Quote]

>>2565100
Humans won't be around forever. We have failed to progress on a civilizational level and these are the consequences. This decline *is* natural selection. We have failed nature's test. It has yet to been seen whether this is just a decline or the precipitation of an extinction event.

 β„–2565114[Quote]

>>2565012 (OP)
so true xister basketball people are way better for the environment then these polluting colonizers

 β„–2565137[Quote]

>>2565108
>We have failed to progress on a civilizational level
How?

 β„–2565138[Quote]

File: 1765927228478l.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (128 KB, 1280x1280) ImgOps


 β„–2565167[Quote]

File: IMG_4845.gif πŸ“₯︎ (755.43 KB, 255x144) ImgOps

>There are too many people on this planet, just find a woman to love, have maybe 1 or 2 kids if you can afford it, and don't worry about the depopulation. The less people there are the better it will be for those that remain.

 β„–2565169[Quote]

>>2565137
Just look at the world. It's split up into hundreds of different countries that all hate each other and find any excuse to invade and slaughter one another. We're the only animal that kills its own kind for personal gain or pleasure.

 β„–2565199[Quote]

File: IMG_4795.jpeg πŸ“₯︎ (1.17 MB, 3563x3361) ImgOps

>>2565169
Guess who's behind all the major world wars.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/A4IRzXSuXC5C

 β„–2565210[Quote]

>>2565199
they literally aren't. there have been thousands of wars throughout human history, are you telling me that every bad that has happened in the past thousand years is because of the da joos?

 β„–2565216[Quote]

>>2565169
What makes you think we'll kill everyone this time?

 β„–2565227[Quote]

>>2565210
Nice strawman, retard. Can't you read? I said world wars.

 β„–2565236[Quote]

>>2565227
History isn't just one war, it's a string of interconnected and inextricable events. 1779 had to happen before 1815 and so on. History demonstrates that this is what we are as a species, not that any single one war was a one off tragedy.

 β„–2565258[Quote]

>>2565236
>Emm actually history is not one war.
Another retarded strawman attempt. Go fuck yourself, glownigger. I'm not going to waste more energy on you and your bitchass manipulation tactics

 β„–2565261[Quote]

>>2565021
you can have 30

 β„–2565601[Quote]

or maybe that it'll come naturally, true natural selection, fitting the niche, universally, none of that stupid bullshit

 β„–2565680[Quote]

File: Rudolf_Alfred_HΓΆger_Beim_H….jpg πŸ“₯︎ (2.89 MB, 4675x3408) ImgOps

>>2565012 (OP)
Can't we have more children while living less materialistic lives?

 β„–2565683[Quote]

>>2565680
Not anymore. It would be a complete societal undertaking to return to a time where every family was self sufficient

 β„–2565689[Quote]

>>2565012 (OP)
Climate change isn't even happening

 β„–2565707[Quote]

This isn't the Middle Ages anymore. Frankly the sex relations have reverted to hunter gatherer levels where women have kids with different partners, and the traditional single person marriage is becoming more uncommon.

 β„–2565738[Quote]

I just want to sterilize non whites

 β„–2565820[Quote]

>Frankly the sex relations have reverted to hunter gatherer levels where women have kids with different partners
Knows nothing about Hunter gatherers other then feminist revisionism award

 β„–2565834[Quote]

Fed hands wrote this

 β„–2565840[Quote]

File: IMG_4478.png πŸ“₯︎ (39.01 KB, 680x557) ImgOps

>>2565707
Typical Marxist narrative
>Hunter gatherers were lgbtq+ egalitarian communists who allowed free sex

 β„–2565918[Quote]

>>2565012 (OP)
I want certain women to have 3 children and others to have 0, it's a fair compromise

 β„–2565990[Quote]

File: 1762255539785b.png πŸ“₯︎ (312.42 KB, 462x517) ImgOps

>>2565012 (OP)
most of the people are located in 3rd world shitholes (or someplace like china), which makes depopulation in the first world very concerning. as of now, india has about 1.46 billion people, followed by china, with 1.41 billion. if we're talking continental wise, africa has around 1.54 billion people. this adds up to 4.41 billion people, which is roughly half of the overall population. including other parts of asia alongside the americas, europe, and wherever else, there are only around 3.89 billion people left over.
for comparison, my country has 347 million people, which is only 3rd to china and india themselves. if we were comparing countries, the us's population is only 23% that of india's and 24% that of china's.
conclusion? if you want to curb the pollution, bomb the 3rd world with nukes. china will naturally decline once all the robots take over their manufacturing jobs.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ ss / craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]