â„–2533242[Quote]
note: i'm not actually seeking to discuss if it would be ethical or not, just if it would be possible
â„–2533247[Quote]
china number 1
â„–2533248[Quote]
>>2533241 (OP)Yeah why not
â„–2533250[Quote]
>>2533248the problem is the consciousness, as i said, could just be an illusion. the idea is that there is not necessarily any "soul" or anything that your consciousness is tied to, therefore the death of the brain would always result in the death of you. this is the primary problem.
â„–2533255[Quote]
its not tied to body, there was an experiment on a dog where they cut a dogs head off and managed to keep it alive and conscious enough to drink water for 3 hours. That was many decades ago so you could definitely live off a machine
â„–2533256[Quote]
my personal goal in the limited time i have on earth is to guarantee permanent life for myself. but the brain is very frail, it does not work properly if you've lived for very long, many incurable diseases like alzheimers can destroy it. as such, casting off the organic brain would be an important goal, but the problem here is with the transfer of consciousness
â„–2533259[Quote]
>>2533255the body or the head? the body could have been drinking the water reflexively and the head does not prove anything as my idea of consciousness is that it's contained directly in your brain.
â„–2533267[Quote]
nigga what consciousness? we are all prisoners trapped on this planet, where our negative emotions are being harvested by the archons, and they keep us here even when we die and get reincarnated
â„–2533269[Quote]
>>2533259no it was literally just a head, and they kept the dog alive via an artificial heart. This was back in 1980
â„–2533285[Quote]
>>2533267i heard this theory before and there could be some truth to it indeed, but the question is about the nature of consciousness itself, not about what happens after you die
>>2533269then it doesn't prove anything. the brain was still alive, as such the soul (if dogs have one) was still active and inhabiting it.
â„–2533311[Quote]
Might be worth looking into creating a totenpass while alive.
â„–2533319[Quote]
>>2533311that's silly
with the current amount of human knowledge you would never be able to accurately predict what's going to happen in the afterlife
â„–2533321[Quote]
>>2533241 (OP)Nigga, you are watching too many Glitch shows, stop thinking about all this.
â„–2533322[Quote]
i am my conciousness and my soul and my flesh
â„–2533329[Quote]
>>2533321i had thought about this long before i watched any glitch show
i'm just interested in hearing your thoughts
â„–2533338[Quote]
>what do you consider of the concept of a "soul" or consciousness? is it physically tied to your body or can it be extracted & moved around? perhaps it is just an illusion portrayed by your brain.
>this could be the key to immortality.
Literal Athiest goyslop (((Transhumanism)))
â„–2533342[Quote]
thrembo
â„–2533343[Quote]
>>2533338ok bro
i don't judge you for believing in God, as there's a degree of truth to every religion, but at the same time everything has to be approached rationally
â„–2533357[Quote]
>>>2533338 (You)
>ok bro
>i don't judge you for believing in God, as there's a degree of truth to every religion, but at the same time everything has to be approached rationally
Its completely rational, the biggest proponent of transhumanism is a gay atheist jew (thiel) running evil inc. If you actually want to investigate questions of a soul, existence etc you should start looking into ontology o algo
â„–2533359[Quote]
>>2533319The point is not to accurately predict the afterlife. Reading through any number of NDEs, people have reported seeing Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha, spirit animals, all sorts of things.
â„–2533364[Quote]
>>2533357genetic fallacy
i haven't even heard of the person you're speaking about nor have i read any transhumanist literature, watched videos etc. my thoughts are purely my own
>>2533359what is the point then if the afterlife is completely unpredictable? i personally don't trust ndes as they can all be reasonably explained by your brain making up bullshit because you're dying
â„–2533395[Quote]
>>2533364The point is agency. If death is truly the end and we have no consciousness, then at least you lived a vibrant fiction. If death is a transitional phase, then you have potentially shaped it through means long forgotten.
â„–2533404[Quote]
>>2533364>genetic fallacyA genetic fallacy would be thinking that everything communism believed in is bad just because communism itself was a mode of operation for those beliefs that was subverted from its foundation by an external seditious force (the bolshevik Jews) to sedate and redirect legitimate anti-western (Jewish controlled even by this point in time) rhetoric on the part of revolutionary Russia. When transhumanism's literal only purpose is to trick people into believing that they are just an amount of flesh with an amount of confidence in its own sentience that can be augmented by being raped by drugs, machines and hedonism then that is the sole trait transhumanism gets to be judged by, everything else about it is just another infantile fantasy that sci-fi will one day become reality like VR, AI and
(((space))). It's all just a downward spiral of emasculated, age-regressed copes.
â„–2533436[Quote]
>>2533404and who are you to say that about transhumanism? not to insult your religious beliefs but at the very least it's supported by rationality. i personally believe there is a degree of truth to spiritualism across the different faiths, for example there 100% is a God in some form, but you really need to approach this kind of shit from a rational perspective rather than strictly adhering to the tenets of a 2000 year old religion
>>2533395that does make sense, as you could very well be forgetting everything once you "leave" your body behind. memories are physically stored in the brain after all (refer to alzheimers progression)
â„–2533643[Quote]
up
â„–2533655[Quote]
.
â„–2533743[Quote]
up
â„–2534447[Quote]
up