â„–2521700[Quote]
I just got back from a shift working catering for a law firm's Christmas party. My job was just to wander about and clean, so I got to observe everyone in their mingling and I noticed something peculiar.
<
There seemed to be 2 distinct classes of people there.
<
The first is the old, white men. They seemed to be at the older end of Generation X. They all were dressed very well, normally a suit, but a few were also in a sensible sweater. They all ate politely, funnily enough they also all mostly ate the steak from the buffet. They also all drank wine. and their table conversations were mostly concerning law. A few also had their wives with them, who were all in dresses.
<
The second class were all of the young people. They seemed to be in the younger millennial to older Generation Z range. They all wore either some ridiculous, garish Christmas suit (presumably as a performative attempt at irony much in the same vein as the Mulletjak phenomenon), or simply their pajamas. They were about equally men and women. They were also fairly racially diverse, featuring many Asians, Indians, and notably a few morbidly obese black women. None of their conversations concerned law. The activities at this party seemed to be aimed toward this group, being Skee-Ball, Foosball and a Chuck-E-Cheese style booth in which the player tries to catch cash blowing around. They all acted very immaturely. They also only really seemed to eat the desserts we had at the buffet. The word "Man children" comes to mind.
<
This makes me concerned for the field of law, as well as all the other vocations foundational to our society. It would seem most of these systems are held up by a minority of old, White men who bother to be adults, competent in their field. But what happens when this group retires? I shudder at the thought.
â„–2521714[Quote]
>I just got back from a shift working catering for a law firm's Christmas party. My job was just to wander about and clean, so I got to observe everyone in their mingling and I noticed something peculiar.
><
>There seemed to be 2 distinct classes of people there.
><
>The first is the old, white men. They seemed to be at the older end of Generation X. They all were dressed very well, normally a suit, but a few were also in a sensible sweater. They all ate politely, funnily enough they also all mostly ate the steak from the buffet. They also all drank wine. and their table conversations were mostly concerning law. A few also had their wives with them, who were all in dresses.
><
>The second class were all of the young people. They seemed to be in the younger millennial to older Generation Z range. They all wore either some ridiculous, garish Christmas suit (presumably as a performative attempt at irony much in the same vein as the Mulletjak phenomenon), or simply their pajamas. They were about equally men and women. They were also fairly racially diverse, featuring many Asians, Indians, and notably a few morbidly obese black women. None of their conversations concerned law. The activities at this party seemed to be aimed toward this group, being Skee-Ball, Foosball and a Chuck-E-Cheese style booth in which the player tries to catch cash blowing around. They all acted very immaturely. They also only really seemed to eat the desserts we had at the buffet. The word "Man children" comes to mind.
><
>This makes me concerned for the field of law, as well as all the other vocations foundational to our society. It would seem most of these systems are held up by a minority of old, White men who bother to be adults, competent in their field. But what happens when this group retires? I shudder at the thought.
â„–2521719[Quote]
>>2521700 (OP)bro come back to /r9k/. also yeah a lot of people our age have no interests whatsoever. its where the entire "NPC" phenomena came from in the first place.
â„–2521721[Quote]
>>I just got back from a shift working catering for a law firm's Christmas party. My job was just to wander about and clean, so I got to observe everyone in their mingling and I noticed something peculiar.
>><
>>There seemed to be 2 distinct classes of people there.
>><
>>The first is the old, white men. They seemed to be at the older end of Generation X. They all were dressed very well, normally a suit, but a few were also in a sensible sweater. They all ate politely, funnily enough they also all mostly ate the steak from the buffet. They also all drank wine. and their table conversations were mostly concerning law. A few also had their wives with them, who were all in dresses.
>><
>>The second class were all of the young people. They seemed to be in the younger millennial to older Generation Z range. They all wore either some ridiculous, garish Christmas suit (presumably as a performative attempt at irony much in the same vein as the Mulletjak phenomenon), or simply their pajamas. They were about equally men and women. They were also fairly racially diverse, featuring many Asians, Indians, and notably a few morbidly obese black women. None of their conversations concerned law. The activities at this party seemed to be aimed toward this group, being Skee-Ball, Foosball and a Chuck-E-Cheese style booth in which the player tries to catch cash blowing around. They all acted very immaturely. They also only really seemed to eat the desserts we had at the buffet. The word "Man children" comes to mind.
>><
>>This makes me concerned for the field of law, as well as all the other vocations foundational to our society. It would seem most of these systems are held up by a minority of old, White men who bother to be adults, competent in their field. But what happens when this group retires? I shudder at the thought.
â„–2521729[Quote]
>>2521719It feels like people don't ask for sincere advice much anymore, but I do check the board every now and then.
â„–2521738[Quote]
>>2521729more people would care about your blogs there so id suggest crossposting if you could. also hope you have a good feast tmr
â„–2521748[Quote]
>>2521738This post/thread is meant to be about politics though. I try to make my "blogs" about telling an anecdote and then synthesizing a lesson or observation from it, not just making it about myself
â„–2521778[Quote]
>and their table conversations were mostly concerning law
Talking about work at a party is very gay.
Aside from their attire, I don't see anything wrong with the behavior of the younger crowd since it was a PARTY.
>This makes me concerned for the field of law, as well as all the other vocations foundational to our society.
Good.
â„–2521799[Quote]
>>2521748I'm sure they all took side eye glances at the old fat loser busboy that thought he was too smart for law school so he has to scrap tables for five dollars an hour like a Mexican
â„–2521801[Quote]
>>2521778I will say they did also talk about other things, but the point is their topics of conversation were normally very mature/adult. It was a 3 hour event so people talked about plenty of things.
>>2521799Made me geg
â„–2521820[Quote]
>>2521700 (OP)Chaos will win kike boomer shill
â„–2521828[Quote]
Work parties are retarded
I will never attend an office party no matter how much I like my job
â„–2521892[Quote]
>I just got back from a shift working catering for a law firm's Christmas party. My job was just to wander about and clean, so I got to observe everyone in their mingling and I noticed something peculiar.
><
>There seemed to be 2 distinct classes of people there.
><
>The first is the old, white men. They seemed to be at the older end of Generation X. They all were dressed very well, normally a suit, but a few were also in a sensible sweater. They all ate politely, funnily enough they also all mostly ate the steak from the buffet. They also all drank wine. and their table conversations were mostly concerning law. A few also had their wives with them, who were all in dresses.
><
>The second class were all of the young people. They seemed to be in the younger millennial to older Generation Z range. They all wore either some ridiculous, garish Christmas suit (presumably as a performative attempt at irony much in the same vein as the Mulletjak phenomenon), or simply their pajamas. They were about equally men and women. They were also fairly racially diverse, featuring many Asians, Indians, and notably a few morbidly obese black women. None of their conversations concerned law. The activities at this party seemed to be aimed toward this group, being Skee-Ball, Foosball and a Chuck-E-Cheese style booth in which the player tries to catch cash blowing around. They all acted very immaturely. They also only really seemed to eat the desserts we had at the buffet. The word "Man children" comes to mind.
><
>This makes me concerned for the field of law, as well as all the other vocations foundational to our society. It would seem most of these systems are held up by a minority of old, White men who bother to be adults, competent in their field. But what happens when this group retires? I shudder at the thought.