[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ ss / craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

18+ | Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 67435.jpg 📥︎ (308.73 KB, 1080x1269) ImgOps

 â„–2493814[Quote]

Are you guys actually racist or just race-realists? I consider myself a race-realist, but being a racist (as in judging/being agressive towards other simply because of their ethnicity) is retarded. There are great blackies and awful white people; why are you a racist?

 â„–2493825[Quote]

I'm an evil racist

 â„–2493831[Quote]

All races are equal hail zelenski

 â„–2493835[Quote]

racism is human nature

 â„–2493837[Quote]

I think its fair to be a race-realist when talking about vast swathes of people and how to solve problems on a statistical scale, but you ought to treat everyone with respect in real life. That is, unless its like a crackhead who you genuinely think might want to kill you, then proceed with caution obviously.

 â„–2493840[Quote]

File: 220 (1).png 📥︎ (70.32 KB, 220x165) ImgOps

im a racist because other races are bad

 â„–2493841[Quote]

Being racist is judging based on the MAJORITY BEHAVIOR of a race. Just because there's *SOME* good blacks and there's *SOMETIMES* bad whites doesn't mean they're automatically on equal footing. Blacks are genetically proven to be predisposed to violence on a tremendously higher scale than whites. Which is why it's safe to assume they're a threat.

"I'd rather be alive and too racist than dead and not racist enough"

 â„–2493843[Quote]

>>2493840
Yeah that sounds like something frieza would say

 â„–2493844[Quote]

post your hand doe

 â„–2493847[Quote]

>>2493841
That's just race realism. I'd define ACTUAL racism as believing certain races are inherently inferior/superior to others.

 â„–2493848[Quote]

Libcucks and conservatives don't realize people are groups, and to judge one on the content of their character is flawed, you have to look at groups.

 â„–2493853[Quote]

>>2493841
not a genetic thing. Just culture and enviormental factors

 â„–2493857[Quote]

>>2493848
When you want to figure out if an apple you picked is bad, do you just the amount of lumps on that apple or do you count up all the lumps on the apples in the apple basked and use the average to determine if the apple is bad?

 â„–2493859[Quote]

>>2493843
cant be a racist if you destroy the entire race

 â„–2493861[Quote]

>>2493853
Sorry pal this was DEBOOONKED

 â„–2493863[Quote]

Both libertarians and K are dysgenic mutts doe

 â„–2493864[Quote]


 â„–2493866[Quote]

>>2493847
I would argue certain races being genetically more "civilized" than others and being more innovative is a form of superiority. Sure blacks might be more physically capable but innovation is ultimately the deciding factor in most cases on a societal scale.

 â„–2493867[Quote]

>>2493864
pls enlighten the nusoi. What is a snope?

 â„–2493870[Quote]

>>2493867
snopes.com

 â„–2493871[Quote]

>>2493814 (OP)
Race is a social construct my korean wife will agree with me

 â„–2493873[Quote]

>>2493864
I don't have the screenshot on my but it showed even the absolute POOREST whites were still less likely to be violent then the highest income blacks in the 200-300K income range

 â„–2493875[Quote]

File: 1763292627000k.png 📥︎ (306.27 KB, 345x435) ImgOps

I'm a race-realist, but I don't hold any negative opinions about other races

 â„–2493879[Quote]

>>2493873
money doesn't solve the sociological issue of most black men not growing up with father figures. So even if a black man makes millions as a football player he's still likely to fuck his life up without some father figure in his life.

 â„–2493883[Quote]

>>2493873
They might be genetically dumb which makes them more prone to violence under certain conditions but I don't think they're inherently violent

 â„–2493885[Quote]

>>2493866
I guess it heavily depends on definition. Though i wish there were terms to create a clear distinction between those who recognize some races on an average, statistical, general level are more likely to have lower IQs and such, and the belief that every member of a particular race is inherently evil/retarded.

 â„–2493886[Quote]

>>2493844
I have olive-skin because refer to this thread; https://soyjak.st/pol/thread/2492272.html

 â„–2493894[Quote]

>>2493886
5% or higher is mutt
4% or lower is acceptable

 â„–2493896[Quote]

>>2493894
braindead

 â„–2493955[Quote]

>>2493814 (OP)
I'm a race-realist, which alone would make me fall under the description of racist for most, I don't believe in racial supremacy, but I do have an edgy sense of humour

 â„–2493961[Quote]


 â„–2493967[Quote]

>>2493955
Also me

 â„–2493968[Quote]

im super racist unless the non-white foid is cute then ill make an exception obviously.

 â„–2494024[Quote]

>>2493968
I only like white chicks saar



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ ss / craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]