№2458780[Quote]
>>2458771christian sacrificed many humans during colonisation.
№2458783[Quote]
>>2458780Christians don't do sacrifices where did u get this from
№2458785[Quote]
Establishing a "Great Fecalwall" in India could serve as a protective measure for Americans against the rising tide of fecaloid scams emanating from regions such as Maharashtra and Gujarat, where sophisticated fraud operations flourish. Much like China's Great Firewall, which effectively shields its citizens from foreign influence and online threats, a similar "Great Fecalwall" initiative in India could significantly curtail the flow of deceptive practices targeting vulnerable American seniors and other at-risk populations. Ultimately, this initiative could enhance economic stability by protecting American consumers from financial exploitation while encouraging the development of domestic industries within India that prioritize ethical flushing practices. In this way, a strategic "Great Fecalwall" serves a dual purpose: containing the threat of scams abroad while fostering a more responsible digital economy at home.
№2458787[Quote]
>>2458780And If you bear with me, I can explain, but only if you post your thoughts.
№2458795[Quote]
>>2458781>>2458783christianity upheld the system of colonial capitalism which did cause the death of many colonised peoples for resource extraction. do not pretend that you would not have or still not do support this system, and therefore are no different to the aztecs.
№2458803[Quote]
>>2458795The kings who called for wars were hardly Christian, and most Christians had no slaves and desired no wars. Therefore there are few good kings as history shows.
№2458812[Quote]
>>2458803>there must be no wars but also we must submit to authority and the church.yeah this is a little hypocritical. It is the liberal attitude that opposes war morally but not materially.
№2458817[Quote]
>>2458812there are many on all political spectrum sides that favor wars.
№2458820[Quote]
there are no true leftists that is in favour of wars. all reactionaries including yourself support them.
№2458823[Quote]
>>2458820the leftists the real reactionaries killing speakers and attempting assassinations and burning businesses.
№2458825[Quote]
>>2458823what do you think a reactionary is? these all would appear to me to be revolutionary acts.
№2458828[Quote]
*native americans
№2458830[Quote]
>>2458825is it evil to attack another's business? is it evil to take a stance against a race and ignore anything good?
№2458833[Quote]
>>2458830Businesses are exploitative constructs that only exist because enforcement by the state prevents collectivisation, they are not immoral to attack. All other points you make are also basically worthless, when you are discussing morality you mean it in the bourgeoisie sense of moral idealism and ignore the conditions behind these actions.
№2458838[Quote]
>>2458833Are all buisnesses exploiting though? I under stand how big corporations like apple nestle etc can be exploitive but what about smaller local buisnessess?
>they are not immoral to attackSo we should chimp out and start looting buisnesses like target and walmart stores?
>moral idealism le badI think it is one of the best morality philosphies but it depends on how you define truth justice etc
№2458846[Quote]
Small private businesses are more exploitative than large businesses because they have a lower capacity to efficiently organise and designate capital and investments. As an employee of a small business its not like I faced any less exploitative circumstances for my labour, because my relation to capital was still unchanged. I dont think we should loot or destroy all businesses I think we should organise against capital and establish cooperative ownership, but people who do this are only doing it as a result of the conditions they face. Its not like the concepts of truth or justice are based off of anything that exists in reality.
№2458871[Quote]
>>2458833no, businesses exist to make or to move things