№2431615[Quote]
>>2431608 (OP)Probably cope or something it kinda of makes sense if you think about it
The only people who wouldd ever be anti puritan are surely always going to be degenerate supporting in some capacity
№2431618[Quote]
Christianity is the only religion that actively confronts sexual sin and degeneracy.
№2431620[Quote]
because they are all brimmy baiters
№2431621[Quote]
Not me
Cope
№2431625[Quote]
>>2431621I though you were a hispanic groyper
№2431628[Quote]
I'm not a degenerate
№2431629[Quote]
Nvke Tvrkey
№2431651[Quote]
>>2431608 (OP)because attentionwhores love attention
№2431672[Quote]
I remember talking to some fag on 4cuck who believed in a religion called creativity o algo. Probably the gayest LARP I've ever seen.
№2431676[Quote]
>>2431672What is that jfl
№2431687[Quote]
>>2431628>>2431627Shalom Synagogue of Satan!
№2431703[Quote]
>>2431676It's some larp religion created by some mutt white nationalist. It really isn't even a religion in a sense since they don't believe in a god/gods. This guy Klassen made it up so he can call himself supreme pontifex and tell people to only eat fruits o algo.
№2431711[Quote]
>>2431705you aint do shit whiteboi
№2431715[Quote]
>>2431711rangeban turdgay
>>2431703so they are le trad based yt nationalist vegans?
№2431720[Quote]
>>2431711Watch your mouth turkroach I appreciate Attaturk but my patience has its limits.
№2431723[Quote]
>>2431705So you are an atheist or something?
№2431726[Quote]
>>2431715Or something to that effect.
№2431731[Quote]
>>2431723Definitely not I think a creator being of this universe exists at least in the loosest sense. I am 100% certain of this.
№2431737[Quote]
>>2431731So how do you know what is moral and what is not, if this being has not revealed anything.
№2431739[Quote]
>>2431731I am more certain of the existence of some higher being than almost anything else actually (including my own existence)y
№2431756[Quote]
>>2431737I dont know if this being has revealed anything. My morality can be derived via logic (not like the heckin reddit atheists btw).
№2431769[Quote]
>>2431756So by human reason? What makes the reason of a transvetite drag queen less valid than yours?
№2431784[Quote]
>>2431769Because he hasnt arrived by true logic there, his sense for morality comes from the outside not within. I can prove it to you via a socratic dialogue do you want to try?
№2431789[Quote]
>>2431784I mean the existence of a god and morality (without usage of the bible and very very minimal logic)
№2431791[Quote]
>>2431784Sure prove to me from your reason that homosexuality is immoral.
№2431794[Quote]
Rolf should convert to creativity o algx
№2431810[Quote]
>>2431791It will take some time to arrive at this conclusion but I will do it. like Descartes but a little bit different. Lets say you cant trust anything you have ever experienced thought dreamed etc. kind of like assuming there is an evil demon teicking you into believeing that everything is fake and nothing is real, maybe not even yourself. Meaning there might exist nothing at all.
№2431816[Quote]
>>2431615trve, the 4channer cries "puritan!" when someone thinks that spamming porn in the catalog is bad
№2431821[Quote]
>>2431794still can't get over the name
№2431824[Quote]
>>2431810>cant trust anything you have ever experiencedThen how can I trust my own mind to come to reasonable conclusions regarding moral questions?
№2431832[Quote]
>>2431824I am doing a hypothetical this is a thought experiment.
*tricking
But clearly there something has to exist, since you for example see colors for example, even if the perceptions of colour was fake there exists something that is being zricked into believing that it sees colours. So in conclusion something has to exist.
№2431842[Quote]
>>2431791wasn't Plato against it o algo
№2431855[Quote]
>>2431842How does it feel to say o algo
№2431858[Quote]
>>2431832Alright, continue.
№2431869[Quote]
>>2431832Now we know something exists that might be tricked (this something is what you perceive as yourself). But now observe the actual implication of the origin of this something. Three possiblities arise:
1. this something has created itself out of nothing.
2. this something is etwrnal and needs no creation.
3. something created this something.
I will now easily prove that only the third option can be true.
№2431895[Quote]
>>2431869*notice that I dont acknowledge the option that something came out of nothing, since my definition of nothing is total lack of anything and if something came out of nothing this would mean that the nothing had means to create something but this is impossible because nothing has nothing.
№2431901[Quote]
>>2431858Do you follow until now?
№2431903[Quote]
Idk what would make anyone hate Christians really, unless you're what OP described
№2431918[Quote]
>>2431869Now first I disprove the first statement, this has the same logic since if something created itself out of nothing, there cant be nothing but something, again because nothing has nothing and for something to create itself it has to have the means for creation which dont exist in nothing.
№2431935[Quote]
>>2431855nobody says "o algo" o algo
№2431948[Quote]
>>2431869The second one is slightly trickier but can be disproven regardless. I will first prove that there is a continous existence of this something and rhis continous existence is yourself (encompassing all your thoughts, but notice I will only proven the existence of you as your continous thoughts, not anything in the outside world).
№2431955[Quote]
>>2431703So White Buddhism
№2431976[Quote]
>>2431948But how do I start peoving coninous existence, maybe you exist just for a short blink of time and then are destroyed forever. Very simple by thinking. Because observe closely something has noticed that something exists ( even if it is only for a moment).
№2431999[Quote]
>>2431976But very clearly we have arrived at the existence of something this truism you might say by thinking . Otherwise how can we arrive at something so true by desregarding all our beliefs memories experiences etc so that nothing is left. The means which have used to arrive at that truism is our thought.
№2432022[Quote]
>>2431999And what if someone just says I don't trust my own or anyone else's reason?
№2432066[Quote]
>>2432022Well you cant teust anyone else regardless. But also notice the statement: I dont trust my own reason. Is a statement of reason (i.e. If you cant trust your own reason, then how can you be sure not to trust your own reason) so you can never 100% disregard your own reason otherwise you couldnt make that statement.
№2432101[Quote]
>>2431999Now our thought process for this truism was the following. Assume A then A implies B. Cearly there is an order in this logical construct, A implies B and not the other way around but after having thought A, we think of B meaning there is a passage of something that allows us to put a logical statement after the other without us ceasing to exist. So therefore it is not far reached that by thinking we have a continous existence.
№2432119[Quote]
>>2432101The think whoch I describe as passage ay be called time (but dont assume it is like phyiscal time, it could be somehow enterely different, I just observed that there exists sowmthing which allows us get from one thought to the other)
№2432130[Quote]
>>2432101Now that I have proven the continous existence of yourself we have to ask, have I always existed or did something create me.
№2432159[Quote]
>>2432130I will prove that something has created you by showing that you are infact finite.
№2432185[Quote]
>>2432159Clearly since you can think you can have the idea of infinity. You aware that you dont know everything (lets call this imperfection). Also notice you can only think about infinity in a bery vague way you cant really picture infinity if you think about it your thoughts are finite. But if you are eternal you would have existed forever and you would be able to clearly picture infinity. But you cant this means that you can only be finite.
№2432205[Quote]
>>2432185So with this only the third option remains. You were created by something else, this something either is eternal or was created itself , this chain of thought goes on, I will now prove that tjis chain of creation has to have a clear beginning and that being at the beginning is eternal and that being is what I call god.
№2432210[Quote]
>>2432205But I will do this tomorrow and go to sleep now.
№2432416[Quote]
>>2432191Total MoralGOD Win
№2432638[Quote]
>>2431608 (OP)>Hating Christianity means you're a degenerate shitskin80% of all time Christians are browner than me, at least 30% are pedo rapist who saw forgiveness in Christianity.
Just saying
№2432973[Quote]
>>2431715>rangeban turdgayDo this please
>>2431720GEG
№2433007[Quote]
>>2431720Ataturk was a whiteboi and not a Turk. Say what you want to say about roaches. Ataturk should've ruled over a 1st world country, but could not due to retarded Balkan nationalism.
№2433027[Quote]
>>2433007Ataturk was more turkish than you could ever hope to be irony poisoned faggot
№2433032[Quote]
>>2433027Xhe was a schlog user known as @glownigger btw, he's also a a massive pitiful faggot.
№2433033[Quote]
>>2433032are you referring to the other turk?