β42417[Quote]
OP here, I've been planning to use Vis, but I already have a Neovim config set up, which I worked incredibly hard for, and I'm too retarded to code in Lua.
β42480[Quote]
>>42416 (OP)personally i use neovim but ive never heard of vis
β42492[Quote]
emacs
β42494[Quote]
>>42480>>42488Text editor based of off Vi and Sam. It includes both Vi-style keybinds and Sam regex integration. It has a way smaller codebase than Vim and Neovim, and uses Lua configuration, with the API being documented on the GitHub Vis wiki.
β42497[Quote]
>>42492But I still want muh Vi keybinds
β42543[Quote]
Neither becuase i use gedit. Gedit provies me with all the tools and shortcuts I need, e.g. Ctrl+A selects all the text in the file. Ctrl+C copies all the text to the clipboard. Ctrl+V pastes the clipboard's text into the file. Ctrl+S autoamtically saves the file. I don't like the VIm way of doing it, which is ":wq" Also when I want to open Vim I have to open a terminal first which is an inconveienenence for me in my opinion. But on Ubuntu I just need to press the Windows key and search for a program. Then I open Gedit. It's like magic. I dont need know much more then that. That's what I love about gedit, it's so simple and easy. I can also easily change the color schemes, but on the terminal it's kind of harder to do it.
β42546[Quote]
>>42543Just use GVim if the terminal is too hard for you. It lets you use both bing-bong-wahoo Windows keybinds, and lets you use Vim motions (so smart).
β42550[Quote]
>>42543>The graphical interface is for NIGGERS. The ones who don't like command lines are NIGGERS.-Terry A. Davis
β42554[Quote]
>>42553it's also made by a pedophile who goons to loli
β42560[Quote]
>>42554>>42554Snopes or gtfo
β42561[Quote]
>>42554A guy named Drew DeVault doesn't sound like a lolipeadough to me
β42564[Quote]
>>42563meds he didnt make vim you nigger
>wayland contributorGEEEEEEEG OF COURSE ITS WAYLAND
β42565[Quote]
>>42564he made vim classic retard
β42568[Quote]
From: patl@athena.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti)
Subject: The True Path (long)
Date: 11 Jul 91 03:17:31 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.religion.emacs,alt.slack
When I log into my Xenix system with my 110 baud teletype, both vi
*and* Emacs are just too damn slow. They print useless messages like,
'C-h for help' and '"foo" File is read only'. So I use the editor
that doesn't waste my VALUABLE time.
Ed, man! !man ed
ED(1) UNIX Programmer's Manual ED(1)
NAME
ed - text editor
SYNOPSIS
ed [ - ] [ -x ] [ name ]
DESCRIPTION
Ed is the standard text editor.
β
Computer Scientists love ed, not just because it comes first
alphabetically, but because it's the standard. Everyone else loves ed
because it's ED!
"Ed is the standard text editor."
And ed doesn't waste space on my Timex Sinclair. Just look:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 24 Oct 29 1929 /bin/ed
-rwxr-xr-t 4 root 1310720 Jan 1 1970 /usr/ucb/vi
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 5.89824e37 Oct 22 1990 /usr/bin/emacs
Of course, on the system *I* administrate, vi is symlinked to ed.
Emacs has been replaced by a shell script which 1) Generates a syslog
message at level LOG_EMERG; 2) reduces the user's disk quota by 100K;
and 3) RUNS ED!!!!!!
"Ed is the standard text editor."
Let's look at a typical novice's session with the mighty ed:
golem> ed
?
help
?
?
?
quit
?
exit
?
bye
?
hello?
?
eat flaming death
?
^C
?
^C
?
^D
?
β
Note the consistent user interface and error reportage. Ed is
generous enough to flag errors, yet prudent enough not to overwhelm
the novice with verbosity.
"Ed is the standard text editor."
Ed, the greatest WYGIWYG editor of all.
ED IS THE TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA! ED HAS BEEN THE CHOICE OF EDUCATED
AND IGNORANT ALIKE FOR CENTURIES! ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS
BODILY FLUIDS!! ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR! ED MAKES THE SUN
SHINE AND THE BIRDS SING AND THE GRASS GREEN!!
When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless
help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an EDitor!!
Not a "viitor". Not a "emacsitor". Those aren't even WORDS!!!! ED!
ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!
TEXT EDITOR.
When IBM, in its ever-present omnipotence, needed to base their
"edlin" on a UNIX standard, did they mimic vi? No. Emacs? Surely
you jest. They chose the most karmic editor of all. The standard.
Ed is for those who can *remember* what they are working on. If you
are an idiot, you should use Emacs. If you are an Emacs, you should
not be vi. If you use ED, you are on THE PATH TO REDEMPTION. THE
SO-CALLED "VISUAL" EDITORS HAVE BEEN PLACED HERE BY ED TO TEMPT THE
FAITHLESS. DO NOT GIVE IN!!! THE MIGHTY ED HAS SPOKEN!!!
?
β42569[Quote]
>>42564Troonland xisters…our response?
β42571[Quote]
<test
^test
β42572[Quote]
I just use nano
β42573[Quote]
>>42572Nigger, I need an IDE
β42671[Quote]
Sorry for super sageru
β42686[Quote]
juste use nano
β42754[Quote]
Emacs.
β42762[Quote]
idk nigga i either use vscode or nano
β42768[Quote]
vim/neovim. I can't vote doe because I use a vpn
β42885[Quote]
Just pay an indian to type your code as you dictate it while pacing back and forth like an aryan.