â„–38111[Quote]
>>38106 (OP)>hACKchanAt first I expected it to be vibecoded troonslop but after looking at it I can say it looks quite gemmy. I can't code so I can't tell if its vibecoded but it looks okay so far ev&oe the dev has a tranny profile picture.
â„–38116[Quote]
is it written in haskell? if not then coal
â„–38117[Quote]
>>38111nah its not vibecoded
â„–38135[Quote]
useless nigger soft, still as slow as vichan and lacks many expected features (no highlight for reply hover, can't hide reppeys or threads, probably has no csam prevention system either)
also the layout and design sucks
wake me up when they make a 100% html ib soft without any jeetscript so I can browse it on my 486 pc
â„–38136[Quote]
>>38135>no jsi understand that js is niggerhell bloat but how tf are they going to do pull info from their databases and run functions and shit
â„–38140[Quote]
>>38137>PHPinto the garbage it goes
â„–38164[Quote]
>>38140im not autistic enough to know why php is bad, can you explain saar
â„–38201[Quote]
1. it doesn't truncate filenames
2. side arrows on each post look ugly and outdated, especially if they don't have a muted color
3. if this is new software why use the checkbox to delete posts? it looks ugly, add a post menu
4. can't move the quick reply window, and you can't resize the window on the x axis easily
5. no image expansion and a bunch of other QoL features are missing
vichan / jschan is superior
â„–38243[Quote]
>>38135they've already made it and it's called lambdaplusjs unless you dislike that layout for whatever reason.