№36765[Quote]
>I LOVE OOP I LOVE OOP, WE MUST RAPE C TO NIGGERHELL WITH OOP BECAUSE IM TOO RETARDED TO USE MACHINES LIKE HOW THEY ACTUALLY WO-AAACCCKKK!!
there is a reason why almost all great programmers hate OOP
№36766[Quote]
>>36765>OOP IS LE BAD BECAUSE… REDDIT TOLD ME IT WAS BAD AND SOME FAGGOT ECELEBS GAVE A SHITTY OPINION ONLINE AND I HAVE ZERO ORIGINAL THOUGHT SO I MUST PARROT RETARDED REDDIT TALKING POINTSHave you ever created a large-scale project before or do you just rewrite fizzbuzz and call yourself a heckin l33t h4x0r who uses le heckin malloc?
№36794[Quote]
low level programming is mostly just the equivalent manual labour in programming.
high level programming won because when you forget about the primitive aspects which anyone can understand, you can do actually cool stuff like heckin science with the computer
№36795[Quote]
also btw the average low level coding project is just a fun exercise in replicating what has already been done.
>dude, check out my custom built compiler! impressive, isn't it, even though i read some tutorial online and it took weeks just to have a program no more useful than hello world
№36797[Quote]
innovative ideas on a computer are inherently high level because the low level is just the implementation; just like how the words of a research paper are not innovative just because they describe something that is
№36873[Quote]
>>36797low level and high level are different areas in computer science nigger. for example if you want to do security you might want to do drm shit with the hardware.
№36886[Quote]
>>36873go into more detail please
№36942[Quote]
>>36797>Only sane post ITT. The rest of you are retarded niggertrannyfaggotpajeets.
№36947[Quote]
>>36849>IF I IGNORE WHAT HE SAID AGAIN LIKE A RETARD, I'LL BECOME A REAL WOMAN!!!!its not about "purism", C has 50 years of maturity and compiler optimizations, we dont need your retarded nu-C just because its """"easier"""" and has 1488 more layers of abstraction, alicia
№36948[Quote]
>>36942>the only sane post says "research papers arent innovative"youre mentally retarded, can this shitty bait thread die already?
№36959[Quote]
>>36948>the words of a research paper are not innovative just because they describe something that is>says research papers aren’t innovative>bait thread2/10 bait. Your English can’t be that bad.
№37008[Quote]
private static final Cobson COBSON = new Cobson();
№37033[Quote]
>>36959you retarded tranny, research papersdescribe new things, they show the brand new frontier of human knowledge, how would a research paper not be innovative?
youre so mentally retarded its like youre an AI bot designed specifically to ignore every logical point and just sperg out indefinitely
№37034[Quote]
>>36968>CS50 LE BAD, BECAUSE IT JUST IS, OK??!!?C is the best because you arent showing your head down 1488 layers of abstractions to cover away from how a computer actually works, go back to vibe coding typescript to make a 6GB text editor because "AI is just another layer of abstraction bro!!! im a "loop engineer" (newest buzzword from preddit) bro!!!"
>ABSTRACTION LE GOOD BECAUSE I DONT HAVE TO THINK №37040[Quote]
>>37034>C is the best because you arent showing your head down 1488 layers of abstractions to cover away from how a computer actually works>saar malloc is a real cpu instructionnigger i can smell the curry and cow dung from here
it's so obvious you're a fucking larper who has never touched a computer before and just think c will get you the most clout
№37042[Quote]
This thread should die. The original post is ESLbabble that makes no sense. The "low level programming is useless" posts are retarded, low level and high level programming serve entirely different niches. Everyone else is leaking over OOP being called bad/good.
№37052[Quote]
>>37042also obviously they serve different niches. low level programming is useful and if you thought im arguing against that you are a typical C lover (not smart)
№37053[Quote]
>>37042also OOP leak is highly relevant beacuse the thread is partially about c vs c++ and oop is one of the main features of c++
№37057[Quote]
>>>36968
>CS50 LE GOOD
good morning saar
№37059[Quote]
a lot of seething in this thread
№37062[Quote]
>>37052You aren't the only person in this thread, stupid nigger. I wasn't accusing (You) in specific with my post, I was referring to these posts:
>>36794>>36797>>36942>>37053OOP is relevant, but this entire thread is just shitflinging and seething from either side with few cogent arguments being made.
№37103[Quote]
>>37042trvke, retarded ESL niggerbabble thread
№37104[Quote]
>>37052>C lovers arent smart ev&oe literally every single major piece of tech was either written in C or written in a language inspired by Cjust hang yourself already
№37232[Quote]
ITT: proof pajeets don’t know what abstraction is.
№37233[Quote]
>ITT: proof pajeets don’t know what abstraction is.FYI C provides a collection of abstractions that you can use to build abstractions.
People dislike highly abstract languages like python because the some of the abstractions have nothing to do with the problem being solved.
Also research papers use abstractions (words) to describe more abstractions (ideas) the words are not innovative. The ideas are. Like
>>36797 was saying. I hope this clears this up for the ESL pajeet who made a fool of himself.
If you don’t understand this simple concept you are a retard who shouldn’t even try to program a computer.
№37397[Quote]
>>37166obsessed ukraine wabag
№37717[Quote]
>>36765>>36844>C is super badass and malloc is actually how computers workDo you realise malloc itself only returns a pointer received from the operating system's virtual memory manager, which itself uses page tables to abstract the appearance of contiguous blocks of memory, or do you just think malloc is a built-in system call or that it was just some magic function that fell from the sky?