/tech/ - Soyence and Technology

cuck license

>>33393 (OP)
>No mandatory access control
>No OS level virtualization
>Awful resource limits system
>Retarded hypervisor which only supports 1 core and doesn't have graphics support
>No ability to separate processes by users so they cannot see other users processes
>No ZFS, ext4 rw, xfs, btrfs support
>No things like src.conf so you can customize userland build
>Even less software available
The only protection openbsd offers is lowlevel exploits mitigations. We have them in Linux and freebsd maybe no KALR and lib reordering but that's still a very bad choice for security compared to them.
CIA model? For confidentiality you only have traditional DAC and dumb unveil/pledge that cannot be integrated easily without modifying source code. Integrity? There's no integrity because FFS2 file system is fucking garbage
So openbsd is unusable trash. I guess you're an absolute 0 in IT security and you just saw a tiktok edit of openbsd. Go back nigger.

>>33398
use case for anyphono of this?

>>33393 (OP)
I use openbsd because it's simple, easy, and well thought out, not only for the security

zogslop os with spade license

>>33493
found the retard

>>33393 (OP)
Not a single person, not even nophono uses bsd for desktop so no one cares about local exploits

>>33398
tsmt