â„–4315331[Quote]
having sex and becoming religious
getting a job
â„–4315338[Quote]
>>4315326 (OP)by killing them
â„–4315347[Quote]
>>4315331>having sexmost white women don't even want kids anymore but if i do have children im making sure to keep him away from degeneracy
>getting a jobso the rich can exploit me? no
>becoming a slave for a jewMMM YES IF THE JOOS DON'T LIKE THE SLOP IT MUST BE GOOD RIGHT?
â„–4315351[Quote]
How can retards like this actually exist
Out of all the problems in the world how can you possibly be convinced that faggots or niggas who like jerking off are the number 1 issue in the world
What genetic coding leads to the formation of a brain thay can come to that conclusion? Maybe it really would be better off if some people were forcibly removed from the gene pool
â„–4315353[Quote]
>>4315351did i say they were the biggest issue?
â„–4315359[Quote]
De-collectivise. Especially in the west, since everyone has decent internet connections and not many people are doing work in a factory or something, cities are completely unnecessary. Everyone can live in rural villages or small towns without any issue. Even if you are working in a factory, it could easily be a small town with one factory, and everything could be less dense.
People are like this because they have no sense of community and are in an unnatural environment. You are a lot more likely to actually talk with neighbours if its a small village and you see them every day, compared to if you are in a city and see more different people in one week of commuting to work than your ancestors saw in their life.
Fags and trannies would die out from this btw. In cities you have so many people close together that using the internet, they can find a group of troons to feel validated. In a village, if you are the only faggot, nobody will want to talk to you, and you will either ACK or change your ways.
â„–4315372[Quote]
>>4315359rural villages are dying out because of lower birth rates and aging populations and younger people going to work in cities because they can get more job opportunities and higher wages. i am nothing but a single guy and i can't do anything to change this in any way
â„–4315373[Quote]
it's done on purpose so more people move to those degenerated cities
â„–4315376[Quote]
>>4315372>>4315373I agree, I am simply saying what would be a solution. It would take a lot of work but it would be possible to return to the countryside. All that would be required is to get people to move from bigger cities to smaller towns, by moving employment there. Most businesses would leap at the opportunity for cheaper construction costs anyway, you just need to incentivise people to actually do it. Governments don't do that of course because confused cattle packed together are easier to control.
â„–4315381[Quote]
>>4315377It's called the porn industry because it's profitable moron, you don't get rid of degeneracies in ancapistan you just make them normalized.
â„–4315388[Quote]
>>4315381Why can't people just like choose not to consume it
â„–4315391[Quote]
>>4315385I don't think porn is subsidized
â„–4315392[Quote]
>>4315359Adding onto this, I'd say the size of small town would ideally be like the cities of old. The way urban areas has changes is due to transport. There was no point in a city being larger than a distance a man could walk in a matter of hours, if there was no other way of transport. With horses and carriages you could extend it a bit, but not too much. With trains, trams and buses you can extend the range to a ridiculous size.
Ideally the towns would be a size so that from the centre, you are never more than about a 30 minute walk from the edge. They could still have things like trams and buses, because they are convenient, but the size should stay the same. This would also encourage more people to go to work or shopping or to meet up with people on foot, which will mean more time spent outside and in fresh air. This is obviously better for the human mind than going from one building to another in a vehicle, which is as if you stayed indoors all day.
â„–4315393[Quote]
>>4315391>reading comprehensao is minha paisson o algo asineither is crack cocaine.
â„–4315395[Quote]
>>4315385So you DO normalize it, geggy.
>>4315388It's addictive nigger, and avoiding interaction completely is difficult, humans are inherently curious and this can lead down a rabbit hole.
â„–4315399[Quote]
>>4315392cities are extremely practical and exist for a reason. Your message resonates with me, but you can't ignore that
â„–4315400[Quote]
>>4315393It's subsidized by the CIA you stupid crackkkka
â„–4315405[Quote]
Also this thread is an agrarian and lolbert win
â„–4315413[Quote]
>>4315395I don't. I think many abhorrent things are still within your rights. I believe there are somethings you do which I might consider abnonrmal or morally corrrupt, but there is a good chance I believe you should still be able to do it. The ones who don't fall into these traps will have a higher chance of succeeding. I don't understand why the chud seems to have the same hate for meritocracy as the leftists, just accept that WPR won
â„–4315420[Quote]
>>4315410Why is every brazilian an industrial fascist
>>4315413Dees
â„–4315421[Quote]
>>4315347ok then continue being a liberal tranny gooner fag then?
don't ask for help and slur the help away
â„–4315422[Quote]
>>4315399They are practical, but maybe the desire for efficiency is what has led us to this point in time. It is more efficient to bring in jeets and pay them slave wages than pay locals a decent one. It is more efficient to have everyone eat ze bugs and live in ze pods.
I don't mean to sound like a reddit communist but this is because of the free market capitalist system encouraging competition between businesses at all costs. Free markets are not an inherently good thing. They were first used as a form of oppression by the colonial powers onto countries like the Ottoman empire and Qing China, since the europeans would protect their key industries while exploiting the others. A system that is built on long term stable growth and that protects the people of the nation above giving companies free reign will be better for humanity as a whole. I do not mean for a communist dictatorship, just for more protectionist policies and less of a desire for infinite economic growth.
â„–4315424[Quote]
>>4315420because the second we stoped industrializing the country went to shit
vargas era and Military dictstorship did the right thing
â„–4315429[Quote]
>>4315420I'm a Brazilian, I believe the reason is because the country is so disorderly that people fall into the fallacies that liberalism (in the classical sense) would not succeed (even though it actually helps the smarter groups in a multicultural sense, and all the DEI and unlawful shit you are seeing in the West stems from top-down measures). I used to be like him, so I can't really judge xim that much
â„–4315431[Quote]
>>4315421i prefer to move away from society
â„–4315432[Quote]
>>4315429for example, it is very common to see people who would be libertarians/classical liberals, but claim that 'this wouldn't work in Brazil because the people are too retarded' or some variation of that
â„–4315434[Quote]
A broad, active somewhat organzied and mass social movement is the only way. Unlikely THOUGH since "the far-right" now seems to think all forms of movements appealing to the mainstream and to anyone outside of the societal vanguard and isn't Hitler 5.0 is something along the lines of "DA JOOS!!!!"
â„–4315435[Quote]
>>4315422Maybe the government style im trying to speak of is dirigisme, or statism.
â„–4315437[Quote]
>>4315385>>4315377>>4315359librard babble
less markets and finance and banking
more communitarianism, more societal cohesion
more FOLK, more traditional culture and heritage
bring back villages clans extended families cliques houses dinasties brotherhoods syndicates guilds parties
unite society
â„–4315438[Quote]
>>4315431ok then do it?
shut the fuck up then
you asked how to reduce the population of them i gave an answer
retard
â„–4315439[Quote]
>>4315424>country goes ti shit the moment brazilians are treated as humans>>4315429Liberalism would work in brazil because all the retards would kill each other in some sort of eugenic civil war
â„–4315441[Quote]
>>4315437Nigga if you waited a second I was literally saying here
>>4315422 that I don't want full free markets.
â„–4315442[Quote]
>>4315439>>4315429>>4315432>>4315434i genuinely despise you guys
i hope you guys die
â„–4315445[Quote]
liberaism was and is being implemented in brazil and it didn't work
â„–4315450[Quote]
>>4315447>>4315439north Africa
North Africa
NORTH AFRICA
â„–4315454[Quote]
YOU ARE A LIBERTARIAN FROM NORTH AFRICA
NIGGA
BE FR
YOU CANNOT BE RACIST AGAINST ME
SHUT THE FUCK UP
AND END IT LOLOLOLOLOLOL
â„–4315457[Quote]
tranny libfart thread
op doesn't want an answer and the site doesn't want a response
â„–4315459[Quote]
op you want less people like this?
kill them
â„–4315463[Quote]
Can we get another brownocaust please salt
â„–4315464[Quote]
>>4315413>I think many abhorrent things are still within your rightsAnd I have the right to rape and kill anyone I don't like, I should not be forced to tolerate any form of behaviour, even if it does not affect me personally.
>I believe someone that rapes a dead corpse is le bad, but I wouldn't do anything to stop itYou are a faggot. And I will kill you for it.
>The ones who don't fall into the se traps are actually smart saaaaaarNo, curiosity is the main source of invention, addiction preys on curiosity, the smart are just as susceptible.
>Muh meritocracy LARP Meritocracy is when I choke you to death and I rape your girlfriend thus passing on my genes to the next generation.
>Worshiping WPRSweet summer child.
â„–4315468[Quote]
>>4315422not really - capitalism is keyed, but it gets blamed by both chuddies and commiepedotroons for the same reason; the belief that 'capitalism is when the government treads on my rights'. Bringing in waves of jeets is in fact based, look at the Gulf States; the issue is that we have too much basic human empathy, which means that this highly efficient policy becomes hell, as we start actively subsidizing these people and including them within our societies completely with no regard to their actual skills or integration. This is not a fault of capitalism or the market, but it is in fact completely antithetical to it
>Free markets are not an inherently good thing. not only are they inherently a good thing, but they also work best for achieving what I believe you want
>protectionist policies and less of a desire for infinite economic growth.these actively damage the nation, and the 'infinite growth' argument is a sophist leftist one. The West is great because of liberalism and capitalism, it is turning to shit because our governments are abandoning them
â„–4315471[Quote]
>>4315463immigrants would keep posting
â„–4315472[Quote]
ban all pornographic content and prostitution
simple as
â„–4315473[Quote]
>>4315472Would never work
â„–4315476[Quote]
>>4315468True, you could always do it that way. Have the ytpipo move to the countryside and have a small group of them stay in the cities to manage the imported browns that are more or less slaves.
â„–4315477[Quote]
>>4315442What the fuck did I do nigga go eat your sopa do macaco or grilled chancla, brapzillian.
â„–4315478[Quote]
>>4315473it can work in a small country and if you also ban vpns
â„–4315480[Quote]
execute all trannies and faggots
ban porn
indoctrinate liberal people
re-introduce faith culture and work ethic within society
re-indudtrialize society
pronove a back to the camps policy so your nation also has an vigorous agrarian population and the demography doesn't concentrate it all on the capital
introduce means of societal connection representation and cohesion such as corporations syndicates guilds fraternities brotherhoods ets ets
movements
parties
â„–4315481[Quote]
>>4315477He had a rage boner for lolberts, probably because WPR keeps making fun of his threads (he only did it 3 times)
â„–4315482[Quote]
>>4315472You could probably do it but theres always going to be a black market for porn and illegal brothels.
â„–4315485[Quote]
>>4315481what Tunisian are you again
>>4315477i woke up on the wrong side of bed
â„–4315488[Quote]
>>4315481i deslike leftists ideologicaly
â„–4315489[Quote]
>>4315437the strongest communities are those that arise from shared values via voluntary means. I agree with the outcome you envision, but I don't agree with your methods or the disregard of morals
>>4315464yes, you reject morals and praise niggerish behaviour, this just proves my point. In a way, you are no better than a leftist, other than the fact you identify some factors which are beneficial to society that they do not
â„–4315490[Quote]
>>4315478North korea maybe
>>4315485The oldest one
â„–4315492[Quote]
>>4315482if we have popular support for outlawing porn and prostitution we could probably just enlist paramilitaries to crack down on that market unless it's digital then it would be a bigger problem
â„–4315493[Quote]
>>4315489Why is it immoral to kill a pedophile?
â„–4315495[Quote]
Gaucho doesn't undertand that you can't force social cohesion and you can't manufacture culture.
â„–4315498[Quote]
>>4315489>disregard of moralsall my means and methods are moral if those suffering them are immoral
the strongest communities are those Build on TRADITION, FAITH, AND IDENTITY
>>4315495>>4315490the catholic meritocratic libertarian agrarian larper nigger who loves bbc and is trans?
sorry to tell you
but you can
â„–4315499[Quote]
>>4315476they don't even need to move to the countryside, it is the imported niggers who live in slums, and if they go on to commit crimes, they get publically executed. Capitalism is the foundation that makes the West successful, meanwhile progressists and socialists are the faggots who shit on it and abuse it. Being anti-capitalist is akin to walking into a perfectly fine mansion with squaters, and instead of kicking the squaters out, you choose to destroy the mansion
â„–4315501[Quote]
>>4315482I've previously toyed with the idea of criminalizing all forms of digial pornography and only having state sanctioned physical shops that sell magazines, movies and the like. It should have a broad enough inventory of categories to appease coombrains so that they don't go and create a culture of porn priacy on the web, but having to go there physically should socialy intimidate enough normies so that fewer people partake in it.
â„–4315505[Quote]
Also.
>Admitting that coercion is a natural and neutral aspect of living makes you a nigger
When I kill an animal to eat its flesh I am partaking in a natural process that benefits me, when I kill you I am partaking in a natural process that removes parasites from the society I am a part of, neither of these are morally reprehensible.
â„–4315516[Quote]
>>4315498WRONG
and I don't love bbc or whatever
â„–4315527[Quote]
Remove /bant/, /date/ and /incel/
Ban OGD
Ban vpns, colorjaks and rapefugees
Ban Tranime, pooners, gooners, furries, Ongezellig and soytan posters, failtrolls and baiters
RangeBan Third world and muslim countries
Allow gay porn like BBC and thugposting
â„–4315530[Quote]
>>4315514Rationale is what separates me from animals, and with that rationale I do what benefits my organism the most, this includes coercion of others that disgust me - why is coercion inherently immoral? You still have not answered this, I have the right to coerce.
â„–4315538[Quote]
>>4315530>rationality separates us from animals, which is why I believe everyone should act irrationallycoercion is inherently irrational and you cannot justify it. Argumentation ethics won
â„–4315548[Quote]
It is so vain to believe rationale means you're gonna act a specific way, rationale is purely up to context, a rational carnivore would see coercion as a necessary and good thing, a rational herbivore would see it as abhorrent, as omnivores we must conclude that coercion is neutral in application
>When I kill and rape your girlfriend it's a good thing to me because you are a parasite.
<When you kill me and rape my imaginary girlfriend it is a bad thing to me because you are a parasite.
Simple? Do you really have to complicate it?
â„–4315551[Quote]
>>4315544Every living thing does you moron, it's what keeps you alive.
â„–4315555[Quote]
Except you, temporarily at least, I'll be the one to cut your throat one day.
â„–4315556[Quote]
>>4315555coincidentally gaucho often behaves like this. It truly is the nigger-amerindian mixture
â„–4315557[Quote]
>>4315552>It's irrational to maximize survivalYou wouldn't pull off a leech if your life depended on it
â„–4315562[Quote]
>>4315556Anyways, I gotta go, social darwinism won, rape and kill all lolberts.
â„–4315572[Quote]
>>4315563Pure rationality without the drive for survival is useless, we will always be animals in the sense of self preservation, morality is contextual.
â„–4315578[Quote]
>I am a living organism and the objective of every successful living organism is to survive and reproduce, maximizing these objectives to the best of my self awareness should be priority.
This is foreign to you?
â„–4315582[Quote]
Anyways I'm leaving before I get my IQ lowered with this talk
â„–4315626[Quote]
Make friends with the young and be their online father figure, since every modern biological father is either a cuck or just gone. Be their mathyr, the one who guides them, or else they will get poisoned by media and the educational system
â„–4315628[Quote]
Ultimately, rationality isn't some magical spell that reveal the "correct" way to live, it only serves as a way to judge irrational behaviours in an unbiased way.
>Why do I want to live?
<Because natural selection has killed off those who didn't want to
It doesn't say it's a good or bad thing, it simply finds the source.
>Why do I want to kill this pedophile?
<Because he is a threat to mine and the children of others, which hurts their chances of survival.
Valid.
>Why do I like sex?
<Because of sensory cues that release dopamine, that reward reproduction.
Valid.