[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1793747231098e.mp4 📥︎ (7.81 MB, 1080x1256) ImgOps

 â„–4314452[Quote]

E1b1b is associated with the (((Natufians))) and their expansions
You are a direct patrilineal descendant of a (((Natufian))) proto-kike
Be ashamed of yourself

 â„–4314453[Quote]

File: 1793037659536o.png 📥︎ (1.68 MB, 1081x1402) ImgOps

>E1b1b is associated with the (((Natufians))) and their expansions
>You are a direct patrilineal descendant of a (((Natufian))) proto-kike
>Be ashamed of yourself

 â„–4314455[Quote]

>>4314452 (OP)
Cucktorio

 â„–4314459[Quote]

E1b1b invented TND

 â„–4314461[Quote]

>>4314459

Natufian are bbc

 â„–4314463[Quote]

>>4314461

Your nigger asshole got pushed into the jungles and was excluded from civilization

 â„–4314467[Quote]

>>4314461
Bro was not kangz

 â„–4314488[Quote]

File: Screenshot_20261105_233839.jpg 📥︎ (1.07 MB, 1215x1915) ImgOps

>>4314467
>>4314463
>>4314459
This is what your (great)x500 grandfather looked like

 â„–4314491[Quote]

>>4314488
that is less than 10,000 years

 â„–4314499[Quote]

>>4314491
Well he's a phenotypical proxy for the epipaleolithic Natufians

 â„–4314501[Quote]

And I assume a generation is 25 years. Maybe a bit too high

 â„–4314503[Quote]

File: Natufian beast.jpeg 📥︎ (20.49 KB, 617x324) ImgOps


 â„–4314506[Quote]

File: Hesus Christos.jpg 📥︎ (26.86 KB, 415x739) ImgOps

Reconstruction of jesus chrike

 â„–4314511[Quote]

>>4314501
no a generation is like 15 years

 â„–4314513[Quote]

>>4314501
way too fucking high

 â„–4314521[Quote]

File: Natuf.webp 📥︎ (73.78 KB, 1219x640) ImgOps

Pontic, azovian and cappadocian greeks are whiter than mainland greeks

 â„–4314525[Quote]

>>4314513
>>4314511
It depends on the time and culture. In patrilineal polygamous cultures like Arabia, men will still impregnate women well into their 50s, so the average is higher. I might say 20 is more reasonable

 â„–4314527[Quote]

kill saracens

 â„–4314528[Quote]

>>4314525
e1b1b split from e1b1a 2 to 3000 generations ago

 â„–4314533[Quote]

>>4314528
>I used to be a nigger 3000 years ago

 â„–4314535[Quote]

>>4314533
Everyone was a nigger. The types of niggers you see in africa today are advanced niggers. Not the same niggers you came from back then

 â„–4314538[Quote]

>>4314528
Any clade which isn't a descendant of haplogroup F is ancient niggershit
That's why you can have a 5th generation split that long ago

 â„–4314544[Quote]

For example Haplogroup I and J only split 43k years ago.

 â„–4314546[Quote]

File: nigber.jpeg 📥︎ (14.87 KB, 588x282) ImgOps

>>4314535
>everwan was a neegr bahk den
Branches R and J had already existed long before, cope saracen rapebaby

 â„–4314552[Quote]

>>4314546
I mean before then. Yes I know that 50,000 years ago is relatively recent when humans left africa long before that

 â„–4314559[Quote]

>>4314546
But proto hominids all had black skin, the first homosapiens had black skin.

That doesnt mean that they were like the niggers you know and love today, they were a different type of nigger that evolved to use tools and weapons

 â„–4314563[Quote]

>>4314552
Haplogroup E is extremely old and that's the main reason we have to specify down to the fifth generation when describing their related populations. Saying you're haplogroup E on its own doesn't say that much. That's why you have to say you're E1b1b. Whereas I can say I'm haplo J and you instantly know that my paternal lineage is Zagrosian or Caucasian in origin

 â„–4314571[Quote]

>>4314559
Like I said in a thread before, white skin is just a trait selected based primarily on diet and latitude.
Farming wasn't invented for a long time, so basically everyone was brown before 8000bc. Higher latitudes had lighter skin but farming is what drove it for a large part

 â„–4314573[Quote]

Natufians are the reason as to why wops are brown

 â„–4314575[Quote]

Same for the greeks. You will find more pontic greeks with blonde hair than cretan and dodecanese ones

 â„–4314577[Quote]

>>4314571
No white skin evolved in the desert out of necessity and became white out of sexual selection in colder climates

black skin niggers struggle to survive in seasonal deserts and they absorb too much sunlight in extreme heat conditions

 â„–4314582[Quote]

>>4314571
Light skin evolved to cope with extreme desert heat in the summer

 â„–4314584[Quote]

File: timeline.webp 📥︎ (13.76 KB, 500x132) ImgOps


 â„–4314589[Quote]

>>4314577
>>4314582
Not at all. Black and brown skin are much better at dealing with skin damage from the sun. This is why higher latitudes = less sun = lighter skin selection

The diet part is based on the Vitamin D hypothesis. Read about that, but in basic terms, the advent of farming and a diet of almost entirely grains and little meat removed a ton of vitamin d from the diet. Lighter skinned people had an advantage due to being able to synthesize more vitamin d from the sun. Therefore it was selected for

 â„–4314590[Quote]

>>4314582
The information for light skin was already in the genome. It was activated by epigenetics.

 â„–4314595[Quote]

>>4314589
you're too low iq to understand what i am saying. Humans became light skin in the desert. They became white in the cold but they became brown in the desert

 â„–4314597[Quote]

>>4314589
Black skin is a disadvantage in arid desert with seasons. It performs poorly in extreme heat

 â„–4314605[Quote]

In arid desert with a lack of water niggers die from dehydration and heat exhaustion because their skin is too dark

 â„–4314609[Quote]

>>4314595
Everyone was brown until farming. WHG were literally browner than Zagrosians, they did not even have SLC24A5 derivation. It was mainly the advent of farming that pushed browns to become white, among west Eurasians.

 â„–4314611[Quote]

File: GOME.uviecclimyear_lr.gif 📥︎ (58.56 KB, 676x480) ImgOps

>>4314589
>Higher latitudes = less sun
No? The Andes are the sunniest place on Earth and they are at high latitude. Generally places at high latitude have higher UV radiation than lower latitude areas of the same distance to the equator.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]