â„–4314360[Quote]
whitey in the domain of the sandgods
You'll never match our superior strength and terror
â„–4314363[Quote]
>>4314360ev&doe timothy mcveigh was the most successful bomber and he was a whitey
â„–4314364[Quote]
>>4314360stfu nigger
>>4314357 (OP)You can make it with nitric acid and and ammonia neither of which are controlled
â„–4314371[Quote]
Can someone explain what it is for?
â„–4314374[Quote]
>>4314371For stuffing into black foid penetration holes and detonating
â„–4314387[Quote]
>>43143639/11 was by far the most successful terrorist attack in history
Whitey only found success when working alone, if you define success as killing a few nophonos and accomplishing nothing outside of that.
Even timmy wasn't alone, he got help from terry nichols
â„–4314395[Quote]
>>4314387sandnigs were helped by mossad to do 9/11 nigga everyone knows
â„–4314396[Quote]
look brah feds wouldnt say that
â„–4314397[Quote]
I wouldnt use ammonium nitrate to make a weapon. I would use PLX and disguise it as a normal liquid container. Nobody would be able to figure out that it is
â„–4314398[Quote]
>>4314395Yeah sure pal
If we measure best by achieving success in political goals, some of Hezbollah's attacks rank very high, Algerian FLN too, to some extent.
October 7th by Hamas was also a pretty big W
â„–4314408[Quote]
>>4314387idk i think pearl harbor is in the running for most successful too
â„–4314412[Quote]
>>4314364Nitric acid is controlled and restricted when concentration is above 75%
>>4314397Nitromethane is also restricted
â„–4314417[Quote]
>>4314408Pearl harbor is not considered a terrorist attack tho.
Terror means intentionally targeting civilians for political ends, usually by non state actors
â„–4314419[Quote]
pee
â„–4314423[Quote]
>>4314417fair. lets drop the definition then. do you think pearl harbor or 9/11 was more "successful"
â„–4314425[Quote]
>>4314414You can only distill it to around 90% purity because you lose a lot in the azeotrope
I don't know if that's still pure enough to go boom
â„–4314428[Quote]
>>4314423It depends on what you define success as. Low iq whitey will usually just look at kill counts but if we're being for real I would probably see if it accomplished the objective going in. And by objective, I don't mean that the goal is to blow up a building and blowing it up means success, I mean did it meaningfully affect the outcome to fit the motive
For example, the main motive for 9/11 was the US raping the gulf with military bases and the existence of Israel. It ultimately did nothing to affect these, but it did change a lot in the world
â„–4314429[Quote]
>>4314425You can just distill it again?
â„–4314430[Quote]
>>4314428Then by that definition 9/11 failed, infact, i'd say it backfired horribly.
â„–4314431[Quote]
By this definition, I think Hezbollah has been the most successful
They successfully accomplished the goal of kicking Israel out of southern Lebanon
â„–4314432[Quote]
>>4314429If not you can add acetic acid to the solution that will react with the methanol to form methyl acetate which can be more easily removed by distillation
â„–4314433[Quote]
>>4314429No, retard. You don't know how an azeotrope works?
â„–4314436[Quote]
>>4314431Although it's honestly very disputable whether those attacks were actually "terrorism" or just military action by a non state actor
â„–4314437[Quote]
>>4314432idk. This might not work
â„–4314440[Quote]
>>4314432water extraction: adding water to a solution with methanol with cause the non polar solution to separate from the methanol which will dissolve into the water
â„–4314445[Quote]
>>4314431Yes they are very successful on yarmouk camp 80% of palestinian expelled, i think netanyahu should do the same