/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

I'm sure he'd like to, but it would require a complete and total failure of the nuclear chain of command

There's genuinely no need for nukes. Even most Americans don't understand the level of conventional firepower we have. Here's something else most people don't know: Explosives, rocket fuel, and bullets have shelf lives. They aren't great and reliable forever. We could have and should have flattened Iran utterly within a few months, all without nukes. Hopefully people understand that Muslims want Muslim rule. That's why there was no meaningful uprising in Iran and tens of thousands of idiots simply got killed by the Iranian government.

But yeah, I do see Iran getting bombed a lot more in the next year. Especially since Israel and the military industrial complex want that to happen. The funniest thing is that democrats want this too because war makes stocks go up, and that's a dream for insider trading that we know democrats participate in at higher rates. All you have to do as a democrat is say how terrible the war is, then don't do anything that would actually stop it and let the money roll in.

War is fake

>>4310027
He could still do a lot of damage short of a nuke, considering his poor mental state I wouldn't rule it out.

He needs a bunch of permission that I hope nobody gives him. Other presidents knew someone like (((him))) would appear one day.