[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (40.29 KB, 780x332) ImgOps

 â„–4300879[Quote]

rate this theoretical country

 â„–4300919[Quote]

0/10

 â„–4300922[Quote]

Bullshit kys op

 â„–4300927[Quote]

Aryan heaven

 â„–4300929[Quote]

6/10 because it could have happened since queen Victoria had a personal union with Hannover
maybe they could have idk won against prussia in a military conflict
i do think owning jutland and Schleswig-Holstein is a stretch

 â„–4300932[Quote]

If it isn't a nation state, it is illegitimate.

 â„–4300935[Quote]

remove danmark Silesia greater Poland frisia and the polish corridor and I give it a 10/10

 â„–4300936[Quote]


 â„–4300938[Quote]

Jump.

 â„–4300939[Quote]

>>4300932
hey Volksich bro what do you think about Austria and the German question?
are you pan germanist or more in favor of the 2 german system we had pre we1?

 â„–4300943[Quote]

File: Surveillance.PNG 📥︎ (385.36 KB, 1593x1664) ImgOps

>>4300932
What does this mean?

 â„–4300952[Quote]

up

 â„–4300954[Quote]

>>4300943
Very often, the term nation and state are conflated. However, the nation is essentially the racial or ethnic tribe, predating the state as the organic, blood community. The state is the secondary creation, created to resolve the fundamental dialectics of that nation. At least, this is my belief; I am, of course, not infallible.
>>4300939
I'm absolutely a pan-Germanist, and I figure that the two Germany system of Austria and Germany render the German race incapable of governing itself, but I would be lying if I said the Linz program and a completely Germanized Danube under Rudolf Jung wasn't a thought I have entertained.

 â„–4300955[Quote]

>>4300922
Are you fascist thurd poscicionist Mexican?

 â„–4300966[Quote]

up

 â„–4300969[Quote]

>>4300879 (OP)
Niggerhell

 â„–4300978[Quote]

>>4300954
interesting
i disagree with you on a lot but i appreciate a true Men of belief in this board compared to a lot of the vermin he have around here

 â„–4300980[Quote]

>>4300879 (OP)
Anglo-Saxony?

 â„–4300988[Quote]

File: Oekaki.png 📥︎ (72.11 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

howd i change the map

 â„–4301025[Quote]

>>4300988
idg why u would remove east germany and then add scania where ingvaeonics never lived

 â„–4301035[Quote]

>>4300879 (OP)
marge is this alt-hist or if it was created in real time i need to know

 â„–4301038[Quote]

>>4301025
scania, jutland, and the Danish islands, were historically hinabuted by the Angles and jutes as well as the danes
both of these groups migrating to england
while east Germany (Prussia Silesia brandemburg/Eastmark and pommerania) was slav during the times of the english migrations
if england should own jutland for its historical ties it should also own the rest
as well as frisia and holland for its ties too
as well as the rest of saxony, which they also have ties (the original Saxony is today known as lower saxony but back in the day it was the original)
during the english migrations the saxons also lived in modern day saxony (eastmark) and in more westwards regions
I merely represented a plausible hypothetical etnocultural map of a united anglo germanic state
you could also try to make the starting point later by removing all dane lands and prussia and frisia and only keeping lower saxony
which is what england looked like under queen Victoria and the hannoverian dinasty



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]