â„–4266485[Quote]
One of a kind not a nametoilet vpn person who used to make 2000 reply threads with such things,oh how I miss that identifiable poster!
â„–4266521[Quote]
Asoori?
â„–4266522[Quote]
Redpill originates in a troon-created film that was a trans allegory.
â„–4266527[Quote]
>>4266487autism adhd depression and neuroticism are all giga
â„–4266537[Quote]
>>4266529normie troon vs internet troon
â„–4266552[Quote]
the fertility rate of india is below replacement levels
â„–4266554[Quote]
>>4266521Yeah how you doin my friend
>>4266522nigger
â„–4266556[Quote]
>>4266552yeah but 1.4 or something billion how soon will they die?
>>4266554asoori?
â„–4266560[Quote]
>>4266556chinas population is already falling
â„–4266562[Quote]
>>4266540>sibel edmondslooked into it and apparently she was only hired as a translator for the fbi for 6 months and said all this shit after she lost in court about her wrongful termination
â„–4266565[Quote]
File: Koko.jpg 📥︎ (202.92 KB, 860x910) b41bdc43dbe0db36b11ce6c1c7c4ff06f413e4c1a13d533c9ad2ee41ed6581100ImgOps
Gorillas are more passive than Blacks, and they can adapt better than them
â„–4266570[Quote]
WHERE IS THE KOREAN WHO HAS ALL THE REDPILL IMAGES I NEED HIM RIGHT HERE RIGHT NOWW!!!
â„–4266571[Quote]
>>4266560i mean thats surprising sine they also (china) have a lower suicide rate than india
â„–4266572[Quote]
fuck i meant since
â„–4266575[Quote]
>>4266571not if you look at their fertility rate
â„–4266582[Quote]
>>4266556Yeah nigga
>>4266561>t. mudslimI hate Mudslimes more than you
>>4266562Even if this is the case, still don't explain how ISIS got their hands on top notch American weapons like tow missiles.
â„–4266587[Quote]
>>4266575my country has lower birth rates than india but damn china is pretty low
â„–4266597[Quote]
>>4266510this iq map is false though
â„–4266599[Quote]
>>4266588Post 'em my friend.
DO IT PLEASE!
â„–4266600[Quote]
>>4266588the ones that have a source linked to them
â„–4266602[Quote]
>>4266565this iq data is false tho
â„–4266606[Quote]
>>4266602exactly
i believe it's around 72-77
â„–4266607[Quote]
>>4266598Prxoy, which is why you gonna see VPN near my flag every once a while.
>>4266602It's for Niggers in Africa doe.
â„–4266611[Quote]
>>4266606According to IIT it would be in the mid 80s but that number is probably slightly inflated
I'd estimate high 70s
â„–4266627[Quote]
>>4266607yeah doubt ill keep using this stupid nigger website , maybe once in a while or a month depends
â„–4266644[Quote]
File: Jews.png 📥︎ (1.21 MB, 928x8840) 2397e281d3868f9632e6bc78af89936673265166cc066b93b3935166339732e60ImgOps
The Jews been expelled, persecuted, exterminated more than 300 times in 110 country for the exact same reason.
â„–4266654[Quote]
>>4266627All the great posters have gone now. but there is no other site Zagros, all of the imageboards are filled with glowies or rule cucked like the normal sites
â„–4266668[Quote]
File: uh0q57.jpg 📥︎ (3.51 MB, 4096x4096) e87feb58e19ccc9906d67746a7614d213da3a979b45ca07d543048a356838fdc0ImgOps
>>4266600This is probably the biggest infograph on blacks, a guy I knew made it he hasn't posted it anywhere, can't send a 'box link though
>>4266602>>4266611It's false because you can't IQ test Gorillas nigga. 68 is probably too low for SSA but not unbelievable, above 75 is improbable and also reduces the amount of role environment can have taking into conversation the US white-black gap, blacks in the US also being ~20% European
â„–4266670[Quote]
>>4266654i got a mind does the job , dont need to speak with people much i already hate having to use the internet or anything thats trackable
â„–4266682[Quote]
>>4266668Phuuuuu i will check that out soon that is a gigantic infograph
â„–4266689[Quote]
>>4266652Low IQ cope.
>>4266670The thing is that I have to play pretend with bunch of trannies-alike every day, I have to speak and interact with them. This site is my save haven.
I hate the modern state of it, but nothing I can do.
â„–4266717[Quote]
>>4266668Lynn and Becker got their IQ estimate for the country of Gambia by IQ testing 3 young children in a french hospital
they got their IQ estimate of nepal, (which is 43 KEK) from giving locals english-language tests
â„–4266719[Quote]
>>4266717Guinea not gambia sorry
â„–4266727[Quote]
>>426671743? The sourced map claims it is much higher, I'm not saying you're wrong, but where do they get the data from then?
â„–4266728[Quote]
>>4266717>from giving locals english-language testsFor real?
â„–4266731[Quote]
File: MAPIQ.png 📥︎ (398.27 KB, 3442x1642) 29f1347aa4e098f23139730ccee4ce67de3472dcaccdccc433a627a5cc98c87a0ImgOps
gooder quality IQ map
â„–4266738[Quote]
>>4266732I meant the method they used Nigger.
give source
â„–4266745[Quote]
>>4266732>>4266649my exact opinion on that iq test
â„–4266746[Quote]
>>4266731Iq maps are bs especially for third world where they can't take these tests probably however indevual iq tests are really reliable so unless we figure out a more universal way to calculate the average IQ of a country this is just retarded
â„–4266750[Quote]
>>4266728I mean according to lynn and becker, you should have an Iq of arounf 75, which on it's own is implausible
>>4266738>All these samples scored extremely low, both in terms of globalrelations and to the geographical neighbourhood. At first there was
a suspicion that not all sets of Raven's Matrices were used, but this
was not stated in the sources. Indeed, Jamison and Moock (1984,
Table 2) reported a range of scores which corresponded to the full
CPM and these gave results which are not much different to the
results from the other measurements in Nepal. Eventually, the rural
origin of all samples may explain the results but an urban sample
for comparison was not available.
The unweighted national IQ of Nepal is 42.79, which is very
implausible, but the standard deviation across the different studies
is only 4.10. The score also remained stable after weightings at
42.99. Data to calculate a SAS-IQ were not available, thus we can
neither obtain confirmation nor rejection of the psychometric IQ.
Even if all used samples are from rural areas we would expect a national IQ for Nepal not so far below the national IQ of its neighbourhood country India (76.24).
https://www.ulsterinstitute.org/ebook/THE%20INTELLIGENCE%20OF%20NATIONS%20-%20Richard%20Lynn,%20David%20Becker.pdf â„–4266751[Quote]
>>4266689you dont have to waste your time on such a website , for me life is catching up so i got to focus , if it doesn't give shit , dont waste time on it , im honestly much better doing anything else but using this , im only here cause im sick(physically) and bored , its just that you know one day life will catch up and you will have to move on even if its sudden or slowly , just chill , i just hope they shut it down so many (Chuds) go and find good in life
â„–4266754[Quote]
>>4266476i wonder what chunk of that is gay couples
â„–4266758[Quote]
>>4266494I feel bad for the dogs
â„–4266772[Quote]
In general, Lynn&becker data just makes zero sense
They suggest that the average subsaharan is literally low-functioning.
The average Nepalese is far dumber than a screaming downie that bashes his head against the wall for no reason.
Afghanistan has a higher IQ than every country in the middle east except Iraq and Turkey.
I mean it's literally nuts.
â„–4266781[Quote]
Guatemala also has an average iq of 47.
I mean this is so stupid. It would suggest that literally the top ten smartest people in nepal and guatemala are just midwits
â„–4266816[Quote]
>>4266728No xhes probably lying, I cant remember each and every country in every Lynn dataset (of which there are multiple) but I don't recall this, the biggest complaints are from hid earlier late 90s and 2000s datesets which have the most imputations and problems with samples. Though, the thing is retards complain about samples of Zimbabweans, for example including kids/young adults who haven't had "good equation" OR that a large chunk of the group had a form of illness that is incredibly common in those areas as evidence of BIAS or inaccuracy when if an area as shit as Zimbabwe just has like 50% of children not having access to education or have an illness excluding those *would* be biasing the results because those things are common there.You HAVE to include them because that's just how representative sampling works, explaining them is biasing the results upwards.
Read dis
https://open.substack.com/pub/cremieux/p/national-iqs-are-valid?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=47u3s9>>4266732Lol @
This is the "IIT" test this data is from"
https://international-iq-test.com/Completely invalid. It's literally a self administered shitty online "IQ test", they're 100% a convenience samples.
â„–4266823[Quote]
>>4266822mayne no drake on the log?
â„–4266828[Quote]
>>4266816youre giving me ideas to increase nophono countries iq
â„–4266835[Quote]
>>4266816Yeah it's an online test, I know.
It doesn't mean it's invalid, I consider it to be much more accurate than Lynn becker. It would have a self-selection bias of course but that would just mean consistent overestimation amongst all countries. Lynn becker is garbage
â„–4266845[Quote]
>Iran is top 10 and that makes me leak so the data is invalid
Geg
â„–4266847[Quote]
>>4266835you like it because iran somehow has 104 instead of 62
â„–4266848[Quote]
>>4266835Yeah some random online IQ test indians take to prove they have more izzat with absolutely 0 validation is better than Lynn giving professional Wechler or Ravens matrices tests to children.
Lynn's latest datasets correlate with the HLO's of the UN at lie r2=~.85
Please debunk this:
https://open.substack.com/pub/cremieux/p/national-iqs-are-valid?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=47u3s9 â„–4266860[Quote]
>>4266852makes a lot more sense than nepal at 43 and guatemala at 47