№4251901[Quote]
>>4251894 (OP)Neo cons and neoliberals use the symbolism and lingo of more righteous ideals that existed for a long time beforehand but all to support the elite and their wants. Both are used to uphold the status quo while changing nothing
№4251907[Quote]
im conservative because my father raised me in the traditions and customs of the gaucho traditionalist movement
№4251912[Quote]
Liberalism was also extensively promoved by the same class
and so was progressivism
№4251915[Quote]
I was best friends with Epstein at one point and he was a pretty chill guy All Things Considered People made up the egg dick thing about him by the way I learned first-hand after he came out to me as bisexual and asked me to blow his big jewish cock Anyways that's how I learned I was gay.
№4251917[Quote]
File: IMG_2350.jpeg 📥︎ (23.87 KB, 400x400) 7199668ced116238c60996341e728fe3f0c679f1079c7cd8b967c386c63e3c3c0ImgOps
So?
№4251919[Quote]
>>4251901Vive la revolution.
>>4251907Your father was only conservative because the Rockefeller class spent decades bankrolling right-wing hogwash.
>>4251912Fake liberalism.
№4251920[Quote]
File: Aryan.png 📥︎ (7.85 KB, 157x255) 98cc8d4d47c847814c3774e4b0aeec3d2d1c0ba7c7adb4f968635ba693d0435d0ImgOps
I'm NOT conservative, death to tradition & religion, hail homofascism.
№4251923[Quote]
>>4251914hush braptard youll destroy the narrative im literally Hitler
№4251931[Quote]
I am a conservative because I gotta conserve power otherwise the animatronics will get me
№4251932[Quote]
>>4251919my father is a communist and he hates shitskins, kikes, faggots, and poorfags. it seems like youre a tranny. are you jewish by chance?
№4251933[Quote]
>>4251919you are genuinely retarded
you know nothing about the AI5, about the doctrine of national security, about the Vargas era, about ARENA, about Folkclorism, regionalism, you know nothing about us
№4251934[Quote]
be a left wing racist
№4251940[Quote]
>>4251936get raped by corporations then
№4251945[Quote]
False
№4251948[Quote]
>>4251919the Rockefeller class toom for the military dictatorship for not being liberal enough
they helped the coup in 62, got angry at the coup inside the coup done by the hardline in 65, lobbied and taxed and tarifed agaisnt Brazil for years for trying to build industry, and then made the dictstorship go down by manipulating the third sector, international ongs, universities and schools, Liberal academics and intelectuals, and the news
№4251950[Quote]
>>4251940the left is the reason corporations and capitalism is in power in the first place
corporatism is the only system capable of fixing the world
corporatism is the only truly conservative system ever ever ever
№4251956[Quote]
>>4251950if you are for corporations you can't be for workers
besides trump is more left wing than biden
№4251958[Quote]
>>4251954trannies are mentally ill anyways
№4251960[Quote]
>>4251956ok stop the bait
№4251965[Quote]
>>4251956>right wing is when economic liberalism left wing is when economic nationalismholy zogslave
№4251967[Quote]
>>4251960i mean he stopped importing illegals which corporations want
№4251968[Quote]
>>4251956truth
>>4251950stfu lmao imbecile 7 iq monkey
№4251972[Quote]
>>4251965and be for hamas? fuck that
№4251980[Quote]
>>4251931They didn't give you a face mask?
>>4251932Yes, I am a Jewish transexual woman.
>>4251933It's Brazil. Yes, it's true, I don't care about your favela.
>>4251948Authentic liberals don't support the kind of strategic sanctions and tariffs you've described. That's a conservative thing.
№4251982[Quote]
>>4251976sorry mr. negrito were not reading any incel tranny cuckold niggerbabble
№4251984[Quote]
>>4251976>rerum novarumthat's distributism which is kinda left wing
№4251990[Quote]
>>4251982that was from the pope in the late 19th century
№4251993[Quote]
>>4251980ugh could you post your naked body here in this thread then please?
№4251996[Quote]
>>4251982projection
>>4251984retard
>>4251980if its against other non liberal goverments they do support it
the American tactic of economic subjulgation
nationalism for me not for thee
№4251997[Quote]
>>4251990religion is gay and all popes are open faggots, like you literally have to be fucked in ass as a boy to become one, sorry
№4252000[Quote]
>>4251996its funny that nowadays marx would be considered right wing and adam smith left wing if they were alive today
№4252003[Quote]
>>4252000Il just filter you
№4252004[Quote]
>>4251997I'm not religious, as i am agnostic, and yes, i heard a story of one pope that liked watching horses you know what
№4252006[Quote]
>>4252003why won't you provide a counterargument?
№4252008[Quote]
>>4252006because there is no argument and your genuinely just Retarded
№4252009[Quote]
>>4252006hes brown, like his skin literally has the color of feces
№4252011[Quote]
>>4251995sir please show boobs
№4252019[Quote]
>>4252010youre brown and gay the same as all altrights cope seethe etc etc
№4252026[Quote]
Che is dead, and we all mourn him. Why? How is it that so many libertarians mourn this man; how is it that we just received a letter from a brilliant young libertarian, a former Objectivist and Birchite, which said, in part: "If they did finally get Che . . . I am sure that his memory will live to haunt both Latin America and the U.S. for decades to come. Long live Che!" How come? Surely not because Che was a Communist. Precious few people in this country or anywhere else will mourn the passing, for example, of Brezhnev, Kosygin, or Ulbricht, Communist leaders all. No, it is certainly not Che's Communist goals that made his name a byword and a legend throughout the world, and throughout the New Left in this country.
What made Che such a heroic figure for our time is that he, more than any man of our epoch or even of our century, was the living embodiment of the principle of Revolution. More than any man since the lovable but entirely ineffectual nineteenth-century Russian anarchist Mikhail Bakunin, Che earned the title of "professional revolutionary." And furthermore, to paraphrase Christopher Jencks in a recent perceptive, if wrongheaded, article in the New Republic, we all knew that his enemy was our enemy-that great Colossus that oppresses and threatens all the peoples of the world, U.S. imperialism.
№4252036[Quote]
>>4252026sir why no boobs
№4252038[Quote]
>>4252026I mostly hate the left and right because none of them have strong leadership. I don't like evil but I can accept it like ones accepts a pest and wants to get rid of. Just asking the ones who are evil are strong and honest in their blatant evil
№4252042[Quote]
>>4252031Nietzche had aura and W fashion btw
№4252058[Quote]
File: Alpinidbros.JPG 📥︎ (609.59 KB, 1536x1152) 57b0d4b8a5e42f316d558b8f8bac8f48796ef32412c364f8ec60472792bb34d80ImgOps
Trained as a physician in Argentina and having witnessed the CIA-fomented counter-revolution by the thug Castillo Armas in Guatemala, Guevara dedicated the rest of his life to the Revolution. He found a promising field first in Cuba, where, as everyone knows, Che was second only to Fidel Castro in waging and then winning the revolution there.
Che was a notable revolutionary, but not a distinguished administrator, and even poorer as an economist. It was Che who led the policy of coercively shifting Cuba from specialization in sugar toward greater self-sufficiency-an arbitrary and uneconomic gesture that almost wrecked the Cuban economy until Fidel, spurred by the economic realists in Russia, called a halt and reversed the trend.
Frustrated as an administrator and realizing that such work was not his forte, Che left Cuba to follow his chosen career as a revolutionary, to ignite and spur revolutionary combat throughout Latin America. But before he did so, Che distilled his own experiences to become a distinguished theorist of revolutionary warfare, his book on guerrilla warfare coming to rank with the writings of Mao and General Giap in this new and burgeoning discipline.
№4252064[Quote]
>>4252054Sure and I don't like that. At the same time I want strong moral racial enemies to fight.
№4252075[Quote]
Che's disappearance for years ignited and accelerated the living legend that grew around him. It was a great and romantic legend, but it would all too quickly grow to destroy him. For as the cause of the Revolution began to become increasingly wrapped around the person of Che, Guevara began to forget his own vital principle that the revolution must grow out of the indigenous consciousness and struggles of the local peasantry. In his head Che knew full well that he and a handful of Cubans, no matter how carefully trained, could never export revolution, could never impose revolution upon a Bolivian or a Venezuelan peasantry who were not ready for the struggle. But in his mighty heart Che could not refrain from leaping a whole raft of stages, from plunging romantically but recklessly into the premature adventure of armed struggle in Latin America. And so, with tragic irony, Che Guevara, in his daring and courage, was betrayed by the very Bolivian peasantry whom he was trying to liberate, and who barely understood the meaning of the conflict. Che died from violating his own principles of revolutionary war.
There are other ironies in the death of Che Guevara. It was reported that as Che's martyred body was brought in triumph to Vallegrande, Bolivia, a Cuban emigre and CIA agent rushed over and, on the public streets, began to embalm the body. The ubiquitous CIA was there to claim its own.
№4252094[Quote]
File: Cuba.PNG 📥︎ (3.41 MB, 1448x1086) d769564931d105f7f229308eea34e5c9fec1db1131c84df68e6f7d1ac0c284390ImgOps
The CIA might claim Che's body, but it will never be able to shackle his spirit. The most fitting memorial to Che was the intensely moving speech about his death delivered by his old comrade-in-arms, Fidel Castro. In that speech, Fidel declared:
"No matter how difficult it may be to imagine that a man of his stature, of his prestige, of his personality, could have died in a clash between a guerrilla patrol and an army force, no matter how illogical it may seem, we who know him well realize, however, that it is not at all strange. Because he was always, during the whole time that we knew him, characterized by an extraordinary daring, by an absolute scorn of death, by his way, in every difficult and dangerous moment, of doing the most difficult and dangerous things. He did this many times during our struggle. . . .
We were always worried lest his temperament, his habit of always being present during the moments of danger, should lead him to his death in combat. No one could ever be sure that he would take even the slightest precautions. Many times he went forward with the advance patrols. . . .
Above all else we would have liked to have seen him as the builder of the great victories of the people rather than as the precursor of those victories. But the fact is that a man of that temperament, of that personality, of that character, of that way of reacting before certain circumstances, is unfortunately usually destined to be the precursor rather than the one who realizes the victories. And the precursors are also, of course, the builders of victory, the greatest builders of victory. . . .
It should not surprise anyone that he was among the first to fall in a guerrilla combat, since it would have been almost a miracle, almost impossible for it to have been otherwise. . . .
The imperialists' cries of victory, in which they say that this will discourage revolutionary struggle, will shortly be disproven by actual events. The imperialists also know the power, the impact of an example, and they also know that even though a man can be physically eliminated, an example like that can never be eliminated by anything or anyone. . . .
Newspapers of all tendencies have universally recognized Che's virtues. . . . He is an almost unique example of how a man could win the recognition and respect of his enemies, of the very enemies he faced with his arms in his hands, of those who have been ideological enemies and have nevertheless expressed feelings of admiration and of respect toward Che. . . .
Has the history of revolutions or of revolutionary peoples been characterized perhaps by the absence of hard blows? Aren't true revolutionaries the ones who rise above those blows, those setbacks, and are not discouraged? Aren't we revolutionaries precisely the ones who proclaim the value of moral principles, the value of example? Aren't we revolutionaries the ones who believe in the durability of man's works, of man's principles? Aren't we revolutionaries the first to recognize how ephemeral the physical life of man is and how durable and lasting man's ideas, conduct, and example are, when it has been man's example that has guided the people throughout history?"
№4252105[Quote]
>>4252070Trvth nvke o algo
№4252138[Quote]
File: Hertog Jan.PNG 📥︎ (599.97 KB, 1549x1712) d9a91cb8ce43a069ae53304f5c11596a5da2c82bf1ab26d1a7cf308d4a9eddf80ImgOps
>>4252042The outfit he's wearing there is actually a modified version of one worn by Dutch Democratic Patriot Joan Derk van der Capellen tot den Pol.