/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

distributism is better

no

>>4233325
it isn't
it is good but if not under a strong corporatist and already authoritarian system it will and would fail

Redpull

>>4233327
I'm reaching out to you and you spit in my face.

>>4233331
if not under a strong nationalist authoritarian corporatist goverment distributism would end up just being co-oped by you know who

>>4233340
its complicated and im not purely knowledge into it either

I can't stay in this thread for too long, doebeit I'll try to make my point here by comparing it to capitalism
>Labour distribution
Capitalism suffers a lot with the distribution of labour as not all jobs are made equal, in a society with less people, the one we are headed to, Capitalism is forced to bring foreign bio waste to fill the less valuable jobs, Corporatism looks beyond the individual want for a job and asks what truly is necessary first.
>Morally backed by the state
A state that is under war has every pressure to support good etiquette and morality among its citizens for the sake of collective union, capitalism lacks this, as the profit motive is quite lacking in cultivating morality
>What about muh boycotts?
This assumes people would even be bothered doing such a thing, boycotts require the sacrifice of comfort, which is a really big ask for anyone not higher than one standard deviation, and without enough support boycotts are rather ineffective.
There's more obviously, it's a very complicated ideology with many MANY variations, but now I gotta go take a bath because I'm a very clean brap.

you know fdr? huey long? kinda like that