â„–4222724[Quote]
slavic excellence
â„–4222747[Quote]
amerimutts do this to the OP
<reddit space
>DMCA Section 512(h) provides a pre-litigation subpoena process for acquiring subscriber information from any[1] service provider in the United States, or anywhere that might honor an American court order. These are proper orders from the Court with the full force and power of the United States Federal Government behind them. They cannot be ignored.
>These instructions are for educational purposes. Do not break the law or defraud the Court. I am not an attorney and this is not legal advice. Read the law: 17 U.S. Code S 512 .
>Find a service that your target posts on.
>Issue a DMCA S 512(c)(3) takedown notice. This is a >formal copyright complaint.
>Prepare the following documents. AI can generate these.
>-A request to the clerk to issue the subpoena.
>-A proposed subpoena (Form AO 88B or a court-specific template), directed to the service provider, ordering them to disclose identifying information about the alleged infringer "sufficient for the copyright owner to pursue their rights" (i.e. dox to find them and serve them a lawsuit).
>-A copy of the S 512(c)(3) notification (or a statement that one was sent).
>-Include a sworn declaration stating the subpoena will only be used to protect your 17 U.S.C. S 512 rights (copyright only, not defamation).
>File with the clerk of any U.S. District Court.
>Pay the filing fee. The standard fee is $49.
>Wait for it to be granted. The 512(h) provides no sanity checks. The Court will almost always grant it. Northern District of California prints these routinely.
>Send the subpoena to the service provider.
>Wait for the dox. It's coming to you on a silver platter. Almost no service provider will pay for lawyers to defend some random guy's personal information.
>That's all. Unless the target has maintained opsec so good that the U.S. Federal Government wouldn't be able to subpoena their way to finding them, you can use this mechanism to dox anyone.
>Yes, it's that easy.
â„–4222784[Quote]
>>4222747there was one tranny who tried it and is now threatened with sanctions from the court
â„–4222825[Quote]
>>4222784>tranny fails to follow the most easiest doxing guidethats why they cant dox us
â„–4222855[Quote]
>>4222825for a dmca to work you need to show any vague copyright claim to an image, nusoi
â„–4222876[Quote]
>>4222855depends on the platform, youtube will take shit down without even bothering to check most of the time and then its up to you to prove your innocence for example.
â„–4222907[Quote]
>>4222876I'd love to see a fart brained soipoopie go through all the motions and paperwork and pay all the expenses just to maybe have some nobaldi from /pol/ maybe doxxed geg
â„–4222930[Quote]
>>4222921plus you can actually get sanctioned, read what happened to liz fong jones when he tried doxing kiwifarms users lmao
â„–4222933[Quote]
>>4222907somephono do dis now
â„–4222946[Quote]
>>4222930i suppose thats also a possibility. maybe the guy posting it was baiting?
â„–4222951[Quote]
>>4222933also not to mention that somephono would have to doxx xerself too because you can't file court papers anynomously geeg
â„–4222965[Quote]
hilariously tragic someone could spend 50$ to just doxx themself
â„–4222968[Quote]
>>4222965actually yes, somephono do dis please
â„–4222988[Quote]
>>4222972this takes me back to Halo 3 days. im gunna have to beat this nostalgia boner with a brick