[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (103.02 KB, 438x246) ImgOps

 â„–4208212[Quote]

nu-ai wojack dropped

 â„–4208220[Quote]

File: lithfoidbaitgemmyfrogaluny….png 📥︎ (587.51 KB, 1200x1200) ImgOps

His vids are overhated, no clue why clittycels dislike him

 â„–4208223[Quote]

Embed vidrel

 â„–4208226[Quote]

>>4208220
His videos are lazy

 â„–4208230[Quote]

Bonjour, Je suis OP je t'aime l'homme d'algerien :)

 â„–4208233[Quote]

>>4208226
i personally don't think so since its take a bit of time to edit, even if they're static png moving around

 â„–4208234[Quote]


 â„–4208235[Quote]

test

 â„–4208242[Quote]

who the fuck "he"

 â„–4208280[Quote]

>>4208212 (OP)
even doe it's hand drawn in ms paint

 â„–4208286[Quote]

>>4208220
They're good, short and to the point, humorous, normgroid friendly.

 â„–4208298[Quote]

>>4208233
It's LAZY, I'm into video making myself and I can make shit smoother than his, besides, all his characters are blobs, it doesn't get worse than that.
>>4208234
Besides what I said ab^ve, a lot of his videos, mostly his old ones, are just copies from other much longer videos such as WhatIfAltHist's, and they get a lot more views because they are short, have clickbaity thumbnails and are extremely digestible for the goy cattle, this is the death of information for the rise of oversimplification

 â„–4208300[Quote]

>>4208298
>I'm into video making myself and I can make shit smoother than his
can you prove me wrong

 â„–4208302[Quote]

His constant use off slop lists shows this perfectly, it barely has an impact on the video quality but since it's a common eye catching video trope he makes so many of them! All so he can get more clicks and look pretentious by putting everything at the bottom, fucking nigger

 â„–4208309[Quote]

>>4208300
No because I'm a lazy fuck myself and I just posted my most ambitious video recently.

 â„–4208311[Quote]

File: 1789918531180i.png 📥︎ (171.37 KB, 641x530) ImgOps

>>4208220
His videos are pretty low quality and only really serve to appeal towards the lowest common denominator. Although it could be a good thing to introduce more normies into right-leaning politics, it can also negatively impact the movement by having retards who don't get the full picture acting like Leftoids.

 â„–4208314[Quote]

>>4208311
Thank you!

 â„–4208319[Quote]

>>4208309
>no proof of ambitious video
can you prove me wrong

 â„–4208337[Quote]


 â„–4208338[Quote]

>>4208319
I'm not gonna self dox my YouTube channel retard, I don't want soy cucks in my comment section since my content is completely unrelated to this site, if you really wanna suckle on GoyLogic's cock this much then sure, I can't provide any anecdotal evidence of my own, but this does not change the fact his blob characters are still (somehow) choppy in their movement, a retard can take 2 years training and perfecting their video making but if it looks shit it is shit.

 â„–4208349[Quote]

File: 1789064473166t.png 📥︎ (373.5 KB, 600x581) ImgOps

>>4208337
A black woman from the Kiwifarms is speaking.
Listen, and learn.

 â„–4208364[Quote]

>>4208337
Not her but someone else in this same thread posted this gem
>Right wing men love trannies because they're as close as you can get to a real life chatbot. They can mold their guy to their liking, ascribe every single sexual fantasy to them, and trannies will be overjoyed to play it out and feel validated. Don't even have to pay them. They get off on it almost as much as their fellow men do.

 â„–4208366[Quote]

File: GigaRape.png 📥︎ (130.19 KB, 805x550) ImgOps

>>4208337
>Kiwicucks on their way to moralfag and faildox all day
Also this foid is fucking retarded, medical workers are not necessary, and unsurprisingly when a guy did call her out on this she instantly focuses on the guy's job being dogshit as a counter argument.

 â„–4208374[Quote]

>>4208366
I wouldn't trust a Kiwicaca for any legitimate information beyond lolcow gangstalking. Let alone a "foid" from the farms.

 â„–4208375[Quote]

>>4208337
>Youtuber Basic Logic made video called "An Honest Review of Women's Suffrage" which of course is not an honest and is obviously advocating against women's right to vote.
>And just look at the amount of likes. here are some other vids he's made bitching about women.
>Yes it's women that are being trained to hate men, not young men being trained to hate women by watching assholes like this guy blaming all of societies problems on women.
>The video starts off with the usual talking points. That women actually hold more power in society then men, he bitches about school teachers, hr departments, and family courts (that are run by men). He goes to another cliche talking point about women not working in hard blue collar fields.
>He says that the only power men have are working essential jobs that keep society running, because of course women only work "email jobs".
>Are all of these email jobs too?
>He then uses the prediction from some Greek faggot a trillion years ago to say he was right about everything.
>Saying women vote to expand government power, welfare, apparently punishing masculinity and that most women support killing their unborn children, which by his logic so do most men.
>His next segment continues this theme calling women welfare leeches that marry the state instead of men, because the state (that's mostly run by men) takes resources from men and gives it to women for free. He doesn't mention other factors like single mothers or any other demographs. He says that naturally men used to protect and provideTM resources and use it as leverage to attract women (which is why they want to ban women from having jobs so women will have to be more reliant on men) but sense the state provides those things women no longer pay attention to men and it makes men become more effeminate by focusing on their appearance (because historically women focused on their appearance to attract a partner?) He does mention they're women that are against government welfare, but only if they have good relationships with men.
In a funny part of the video he says.
>This again mirrors Aristophany's prediction where in the play the assembly women forced men's attention to be shared with less desirable women
>Don't many of the incels that would agree with this video want the same thing but in reverse?
<reddit space
>Next he argues women are too "agreeable", which is to say women aren't independent voters but instead just parrot whatever the mainstream media tells them. Then he argues women voting destroys the family because if they vote the same it's redundant (which is a problem I guess) and if they vote different from their husband it's of course a problem. He includes single women in this BTW so if a woman votes different from a man she's not in a relationship with it's a problem. Because it delays family formation, Are you noticing a pattern with this guys arguments?
>He Finally concludes the video by flat out blaming the female vote for all of societies ills and wouldn't recommend it, like we asked for this niggers recommendation on anything. Why are women becoming so radical BTW? Why don't they want to date us? Total mystery to me? It must be dating apps or something?



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]