do (You) read Semitic Controversies?<https://karlradl14.substack.com/

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
Flag
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

Chud Ha2T88ir 10/11/26 (Sun) 11:45:25 №4181086 [Quote]

do (You) read Semitic Controversies?
<
https://karlradl14.substack.com/

Chud DcePE8Gr 10/11/26 (Sun) 11:56:00 №4181157 [Quote]

>>4181086 (OP)
what is this site anyway

Chud Ha2T88ir 10/11/26 (Sun) 11:57:05 №4181170 [Quote]

>>4181157
substack

Colorjak 10/11/26 (Sun) 11:59:10 №4181183 [Quote]

i dont hate joos but this substack seems very gemmy so i guess that im gonna save that link

Lebanigger!!DmOViibZok 3TT1GQPQ 10/11/26 (Sun) 12:01:14 №4181195 [Quote]

This guy joined a xitter space once to debate (he lost) and you could hear him breathing. I wonder if he's just fat or has a condition

BharvtGod Ox7gop!Z [VPN] 10/11/26 (Sun) 12:02:31 №4181201 [Quote]

I read antisemitic controversies because Nazis are Sephardic Jews who want to kill the Ashkenazis

Chud BqdRAduP 10/11/26 (Sun) 12:03:06 №4181205 [Quote]

>>4181195
hes old

Chud Ha2T88ir 10/11/26 (Sun) 12:03:31 №4181207 [Quote]

File: Giga_goyim_snca.gif 📥︎ (13.32 MB, 768x774) ImgOps

>I read antisemitic controversies because Nazis are Sephardic Jews who want to kill the Ashkenazis

BharvtGod Ox7gop!Z [VPN] 10/11/26 (Sun) 12:03:54 №4181212 [Quote]

>>4181201
This theory isn't mine BTW I think I first heard this theory in a schizo comment section

Global War Party member dBLl^WHa 10/11/26 (Sun) 12:18:45 №4181311 [Quote]

File: HTHbW8TbwAAuuV6.jpg 📥︎ (81.34 KB, 520x664) ImgOps

>>4181086 (OP)
>>4181195
Radl is a geriatric midwit tard who pushes a retarded form of Tommy Robinson ahh worldview-Hitlerism that's insanely cringe. He "fact checks" Christian Identity subhumans who claim Darwinism is jewish, denies the Zweites Buch, Table Talks, Goebbels and Rosenberg diaries to pretend Hitler was Christian.
He also reposts stuff like picrel with laughing emojis and expects him to take him seriously

Chud BqdRAduP 10/11/26 (Sun) 12:24:13 №4181358 [Quote]

>>4181311
>Table Talks
mostly a fabrication by bormann, the two original authors couldn't even agree with each other either and later it was further adulturated by a french writer who fabricated more stories
>Goebbels
>the USSR would NEVER fabricate anything EVER
>Rosenberg
the myth of the twentieth century and his other public works disproves plenty of it

Global War Party member dBLl^WHa 10/11/26 (Sun) 12:38:23 №4181432 [Quote]

File: HKoSfuxXMAAzLWx.jpg 📥︎ (217.69 KB, 506x781) ImgOps

File: HPUnAYWWoAAUC8X.jpg 📥︎ (305.08 KB, 1100x744) ImgOps

>>4181358
There is no evidence they were fabricated. Literally no historian denies the table talks. And Hitler specifically entrusted Bormann above all to maintain his legacy regarding his personal beliefs and experience due to Bormann's true loyalty: