â„–4179329[Quote]
>>4179318 (OP)Can you post his deconstruction of the lolbert ideology? I would like to read them
â„–4179334[Quote]
>>4179329He explained it to me in vc I can't.
â„–4179337[Quote]
And honestly? - that's growth. ✨
â„–4179344[Quote]
>>4179318 (OP)>refuted the NAPanyone can do this
ancaps who promote this don't think about anarcho capitalism enough
â„–4179383[Quote]
File: Rebel.PNG 📥︎ (224.32 KB, 1290x2056) 1c03aa516adccb43152ed7a23e1cec857ad8cfce11211256ef42a02b4a9fbffa0ImgOps
>>4179364I really want to try horse meat. It's common in Kazakhstan.
â„–4179385[Quote]
>>4179383I'd try horse meat if i had the chance to
â„–4179386[Quote]
Let's make more threads about I1
â„–4179387[Quote]
>>4179379>>4179381>REAL ANCAPISTAN HASN'T BEEN TRIED BEFORE, YOU STUPID STATIST NAZI CHUDLolberts are so easy to make their tiny clitties leak seething at statistBVLLS
â„–4179388[Quote]
>>4179387>REAL ANCAPISTAN HASN'T BEEN TRIED BEFORE, YOU STUPID STATIST NAZI CHUDSQQN
â„–4179405[Quote]
>>4179404this is literally what will happen doe, you're a stubborn retard for pretending it won't
â„–4179407[Quote]
>>4179401actually it's illegal to increase worker pay
harrison ford wanted to pay his workers more but his investors sued the fuck out of him for doing so. This set a president that you cannot dilute profits to your work force.
This is, again, the states fault
â„–4179410[Quote]
>>4179407So investors, who play no role in federal government and actively exploit it using their capital is somehow the fuggen gubberments fault?
â„–4179414[Quote]
>>4179410They're allowed to do it, so they do
This is corruption, is it not? why can't you, a business owner, pay your workers more because you value them?
â„–4179419[Quote]
Pretty much every case of corruption can be tied to the state
monopolies only occur because of state sponsored deals. it's the state that has to dilute ownership because they realize that without competition, growth stagnates.
if they could, they would privatize everything. The more private things become, the better things become.
â„–4179425[Quote]
THE CLASSIC lolbert argument of blaming all the fails of capitalism on the fuggen gubberment
â„–4179426[Quote]
>>4179424Continue leaking your clitty retard, it's not making your faggy gay ideology any more popular
â„–4179427[Quote]
>>4179425what failure of capitalism
when did we bring up capitalism
i'm talking about corruption, something that is present in almost every society because ther'es central control
â„–4179428[Quote]
>>4179426I don't care if it's popular
it's the most authentic taht matches with human nature the best
â„–4179430[Quote]
People are NOT cattle actually
everyone deserves a chance to do whatever they want and profit from this. in a totally free market, there is no poverty or corruption
â„–4179442[Quote]
>>4179436Is it also then unreasonable to you and your less intelligent cuckpass clitty leaking friend here to implement guard rails using the state's power to stop such a thing?
â„–4179443[Quote]
>>4179442the whole reason this problem exists is BECAUSE of the state
â„–4179445[Quote]
they have to put guard rails in because the system allows for this sort of thing to happen
â„–4179447[Quote]
>>4179443Actually it's the fuggen jews
â„–4179449[Quote]
>>4179447the jews only have this much influence because of the state
â„–4179466[Quote]
>>4179442A little bit, yeah. The state is a very unique vessel, an absolute and indisputable monopoly. To expect it, and more specifically the people driven to administer it, to play the part of enlightened reformers is very naive. Theodore Roosevelt, famous "progressive" trust-buster who started the investigation which broke up Standard Oil, had direct ties to the Morgan financial interests. Standard Oil had steadily been losing marketshare for years, and obtained the marketshare that it did through legitimate and innovative practices, but the Morgans sought to undermine a commercial rival. And, of course, this isn't to suggest Rockefeller hands are entirely clean. The making of the Standard Oil empire was legitimate, laudable even, but lobbying efforts to maintain it and undermine its competition were very real.
â„–4179480[Quote]
>>4179479this is just an extension of ancap
â„–4179483[Quote]
>>4179480fascism is whem capitalism
🥀
â„–4179486[Quote]
>>4179483okay then i guess this is basically tribalism which would lead to a failed society
â„–4179487[Quote]
>>4179486go back to clitty leaking it was more funny than watching you pathetically attempt to defend your jewish ideology
â„–4179491[Quote]
>>4179487you would say this because you still think national socialism is even possible in this society
â„–4179498[Quote]
>>4179495He hasn't researched any history pre ww2 because that's how expansive his world view is from using image boards
â„–4179503[Quote]
>>4179486basically
aldoe the existing Examples of An anarchic fascist regime did prove itself to function
the fascists before going into power terrorized and ruled italy trough force fear crime and strength
Squadristi went into city after city killing commies fags leftists liberals
some liberal Catholics
minorities
the same can be said for the freikorps in Italy or any non governmental owned institutions
they ruled the nation outside the state
their end goal was to own the state sure
but it didn't
yet it ruled
you can do wonders even without the state
they didn't seek its abolishment, so idk if they can be considered anarchists, but their actions and history was surely anarchic and rebel
â„–4179504[Quote]
You should make a frog with the 0 replies award to honor this moment
â„–4179505[Quote]
i do belive extra state organizations and institutions are good should exist and mold society
if thats anarchic idk
for me the state is a tool like no other and you can rule without it, but its better to do so with it
â„–4179516[Quote]
>>4179503>the fascists before going into power terrorized and ruled italy trough force fear crime and strength political extremism is not a valid ideology, sorry i but i can't take this seriously as an independent system of ruling
you do not kill your opponent, because you will make an enemy of everyone
â„–4179520[Quote]
>>4179503> but their actions and history was surely anarchic and rebelI still view it as extremism
Extremism will never prosper. It just can't. It's not possible because it's foundation is based on hate.
â„–4179523[Quote]
>>4179516i don't think you realize how beloved the fascists, the nazis, and even other far right movements were by the people for killing communists lol
Mussolini was elected, you need to remember that
he got a big, big number of votes
â„–4179525[Quote]
>>4179520it can and id did thought all of human history
â„–4179528[Quote]
>>4179523And they ultimately lost
Also this can't be 100% accurate because national socialism and socialism are extremely similar. the german nazis were anti liberal, not anti commie
Communism was popular around this time, it was also seen as revolutionary.
what you're saying doesn't sound accurate for the time, but I have never studied italian fascism so what do i know
â„–4179531[Quote]
>>4179525where are your extremist ideologies today? we have proven time and time again that the most rational system will be the best
â„–4179540[Quote]
>>4179528because of the war
without war the system can and will exist for very long periods of time
francos spain was from the 30s til the 70s
vargas ruled from 1920 something til like the 50s
then he was reelected
then the Dictstorship came and it was inspired by him and they ruled from the 60s til the 80s
greece had metaxas and then the cornels, ruled for far longer than anything really
italy had Mussolini from 20 til 40
germany had an authoritarian system from like, 1700 til 1960 kek
even the post war Christian democraties were in many ways reminiscent of the old ways
Both economicaly socialy and ideologicaly
they were chuds but democratic chuds
they still hanged commies
everything started to change on lile the 60s n 80s
â„–4179545[Quote]
nazism is moderate ancap is extremist and radical
that's the truth
â„–4179547[Quote]
>>4179531just because the zeitgeist is in your favor it does not mean your system is the best one
â„–4179551[Quote]
who even is this gempass faggot anyways
who even still owns these? didn't janny remove them all from the piblic?
â„–4179553[Quote]
>>4179535I don't associate a logistical system to extremism because i don't compare one ideology to the other when the fundamentals are completely different
â„–4179555[Quote]
what are you advocating for politicaly?
also what is your definition of extreme?
â„–4179557[Quote]
honestly this is worthless
all of this is worthless
im not talking to anyone of you anymore
im better than this
â„–4179559[Quote]
>>4179557ITS A POLITICAL BOARD YOU FUCKING NIGGER
â„–4179562[Quote]
>>4179547i never said this either. If you have a better alternative I'd love to hear it
But i've heard so many and this is my favorite and I love thinking about it
â„–4179563[Quote]
>>4179557no brapzilla come back you were keyed n shiet
â„–4179591[Quote]
>>4179563FUCK i forgot the name field
>>4179562what?
â„–4179596[Quote]
>>4179591I've entertained alot of political ideologies and anarcho capitalism is my favorite
this was a gradual shift where I liked the idea of less government but as I've studied this more and more I've realized that you really just don't need a state at all
â„–4179608[Quote]
>>4179596A
>gempass kikes are ancapsmaybe thats why this site is so pedophilic as of suddenly
â„–4179611[Quote]
>>4179608lolberts say pedos violate the NAP so no no no
â„–4179624[Quote]
>>4179611The NAP is whatever they say it is
its like the ancap version of the acerbo law
its basically a blank check to execute opposite to the ideology
they seek a society without state, but statist
they seek to replace the Beurocratic governmental aparatus for the Plutocratic corporal one
and their law, instead of being one rooted in tradition culture customs faith and heritage, its based on this "NAP"
a blank check
with no clear definition
everything can violate the NAP
nothing can Violate the NAP
its up to leadership to decide
â„–4179632[Quote]
>>4179624Why do you write like this
â„–4179633[Quote]
>>4179624>everything can violate the NAP>nothing can Violate the NAP>its up to leadership to decideThis is EXACTLY what I say. Human rights will be entirely subjective in an ancap society.
I really dislike the NAP but if you talk to most lolberts the yseem to take it seriously so they don't appear as pedophiles or something
â„–4179640[Quote]
>>4179633How is age of consent less subjective tham morality? What makes it pedophilia? Having sex with a 13 year old could be a-okay NAP following
â„–4179651[Quote]
>>4179640i'm not discussing age of consent in this thread becasue i don't give a fuck
â„–4179654[Quote]
>>4179651>not giving a fuck about AOCIs this based and ancappilled?
â„–4179656[Quote]
>>4179640> Having sex with a 13 year old could be a-okay NAP followingthis is why the NAP is stupid
â„–4179669[Quote]
>>4179656How is it less stupid than you having no answer for such either, other than not caring for building/having a structure to prevent acts of pedophilia