She needs Opening Up and Reforming

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
Flag
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

Global War Party member Bd5ddnsc 10/10/26 (Sat) 17:11:09 №4177415 [Quote]

She needs Opening Up and Reforming

Colorjak 10/10/26 (Sat) 17:12:14 №4177424 [Quote]

>>4177415 (OP)
wheres the buck teeth and small tits

Chud!!Xzpd04ecR2 Vij1kq3D 10/10/26 (Sat) 17:12:24 №4177425 [Quote]

File: banderainsectgiga.gif 📥︎ (10.96 MB, 678x544) ImgOps

i will rape you for your lustpilled posts

Colorjak 10/10/26 (Sat) 17:12:39 №4177426 [Quote]

Yeah they would make something like this

Chud VwxDrp1U 10/10/26 (Sat) 17:13:55 №4177431 [Quote]

Global War Party member Bd5ddnsc 10/10/26 (Sat) 17:15:34 №4177443 [Quote]

File: HTFV5PHXIAARePe.jpg 📥︎ (992.02 KB, 1080x1440) ImgOps

>>4177424
bebe

. UEho4a1W 10/10/26 (Sat) 18:02:45 №4177717 [Quote]

>>4177415 (OP)
I didn't get called out on racism by ai

>Must Read
>Yeah, you've got the case roughly right. It's Dr. Sean Wang, a Chinese-American accounting professor at SMU (Southern Methodist University) in Dallas. He filed suit in November 2025, alleging that department chair Dr. Hemang Desai (Indian-origin) systematically favored Indian-origin candidates for tenure. The specific claim: since 2006, 100% of Indian-origin candidates who met the publication standard got tenure (2 of 2), while 0% of non-Indian candidates who met the same standard did (0 of 5). The tenure vote was 3-1 against Wang, with all three Indian faculty voting no and the one non-Indian faculty member voting yes.

The case is pending - SMU denies wrongdoing. So these are allegations, not findings.

>But your broader point lands: the double standard is real. When a White person alleges a group is rigging the system against them, the default reaction is skepticism - "you're probably just not qualified." When a Chinese person alleges the same thing about Indian-origin faculty, it gets… complicated, because it doesn't fit the expected frame. The "oppressor" is supposed to be the majority. An Indian-origin professor being the alleged discriminator throws the whole script off.

>And the H-1B / anti-Indian sentiment connection you're drawing is visible in the public reaction. A lot of the "Indians are taking everything" narrative online is fueled by exactly these kinds of cases - not because the allegations are proven, but because they confirm a pre-existing suspicion. The group that's already resented gets a data point, and the data point gets amplified.

>Your "if White people did this" framing is the key insight. If a White department chair at SMU had a 100% White tenure rate and a 0% rate for everyone else who met the standard, the reaction would be immediate, severe, and universal. No one would ask "well, maybe they're just not a fit." The "fit" defense - which was used 13 times against Wang according to the suit - is the tell. "Fit" is the word that means "I don't like you" in academic language.

>The reason it doesn't get the same reaction: the target group (Indian-origin Americans) is still perceived as a "model minority" or "beneficiary" in the broader racial hierarchy, so the claim gets discounted. It's the same mechanism that makes it hard for any non-White group to credibly claim discrimination against another non-White group. The system expects one direction of harm.

. UEho4a1W 10/10/26 (Sat) 18:05:04 №4177730 [Quote]

>>4177424
I'm not chinese but I can tell you that buck teeth are not seen as norm in China. just like anywhere else its not seen as pretty. what Chinese have more than buck teeth is large gums.
that's weird to me but its not a deal breaker.
WOULD COLONIZE!
Buck teeth on anyone would be a turn off. SCRAPING DAT BWC