â„–4167304[Quote]
the 3 branches of division are basically a gay jew copy of the 3 states and the states general
i do think that only 3 is kinda le bad
Borgiousie and proletarians aren't the same
what category would the military be in?
the beurocracy? the Intelligencia?
farmers and proles have different roles
ideologies and priests do too
Military nobility and land rural nobility
Theres even industrial nobilities and political dinasties
how would they be categorized?
â„–4167313[Quote]
rentiers become the nobility they don't serve the same role as the clergy
the role of the clergy was delegated to ideologues, philosophers, political parties and leaders, mass movements,intelectuals
â„–4167345[Quote]
I haven't looked into Sieyes' analysis but assuming the clergy is the church then they would still have their own characteristics and not just be the most protected class, right? If so then I'd say the equivalent wouldn't be as good because the church can intrinsically shape public opinion while the privileged rentiers still have to employ propaganda (with the second estate obviously playing a part in that).
â„–4167399[Quote]
>Borgiousie and proletarians aren't the same
Both include genuinely productive members of society.
>what category would the military be in?
The second estate, like they were is Sieyes's analysis.
>the beurocracy?
You never fail to impress me with how terrible you are at spelling. Again, if we're talking about government bureaucracy then obviously the second estate.
>the Intelligencia?
Do they receive state-subsidies or general favor (research grants, direct administrative influence, etc)? If yes, first estate. If not, third estate.
>farmers and proles have different roles
Not all agricultural workers own the land they toil.
>Military nobility
Already explained this.
>land rural nobility
First estate.
>rentiers become the nobility they don't serve the same role as the clergy
You're thinking about the parallels wrong. Rentier monopoly capitalists replace the clergy because both were semi-independent beneficiaries of the state. This makes them not literally the state, but parasitic with the aid of the state. In this way, they serve somewhat as a false check on the state, institutions which aren't always 1-to-1 in line with the state and ultimately pursue their own ends first, but still need the state to sustain their wealth and power.
â„–4167462[Quote]
>>4167442Okay, I see. Then I don't see an issue with your version.
â„–4167522[Quote]
>class theory
KILL KIIKES POLITICIASN NIGGERS JEUICE CUCKS AND FAGS
â„–4167549[Quote]
>>4167540Axis Of Resistance.
â„–4167628[Quote]
>>4167626Do you know whay i'm referencing doe
â„–4167641[Quote]
>>4167279 (OP)I like the three estates.
>State privileged rentiersI'd say that, like the clerics of old, the modern iteration of the first estate would be concerned with defining and maintaining a specific morality, so something like academics and those fags who tell you how much of a heccin chud you are.
The other two are correct ou algo asi
â„–4167659[Quote]
>>4167636@Gaucho is this how you came to be?
â„–4167674[Quote]
>>4167659genuinely kill yourself and bring wpr with you
â„–4167676[Quote]
kys
â„–4167677[Quote]
derail
â„–4167679[Quote]
inhibit
â„–4167680[Quote]
rape
â„–4167903[Quote]
>>4167695Don't bring the Name of God in vain
you literally are doing this right now, not in the normie sense but the literal defined sense
>>4167754>popular nationalismyou aren't a popular nationalist
you aren't a nationalist at all
you hate your race, your culture, your history and heritage
you hate your contrymen
just accept it
you are a jewish sissy trans pedophile who deserves to hang
â„–4167913[Quote]
i genuinely hate you everything about you what you belive on and what you claim to belive o fucking despise your existance
kys
you are a hypocrite a contradictory walking mess a big time projector a retard a retarded low IQ midwit smug high and mighty transexual full of youself
â„–4167914[Quote]
emd it
â„–4168221[Quote]
>>4168212Elaborate? Or do you just know superficial knowledge of xhim?