â„–4165201[Quote]
dont really trust this study its very outdated for mena
â„–4165218[Quote]
>>4165214>Dits an interesting case since its related to jomon and basal branches
â„–4165223[Quote]
>>4165218Their fact their mt DNA is also similar suggests they descend partially from a common ancestor, not just from its male or female members of said population.
â„–4165224[Quote]
>>4165223whats their mt dna?
â„–4165225[Quote]
>>4165218>>4165223So are the Jomon related to Tibet?
â„–4165235[Quote]
>>4165224Uh just realized first map is of y dna not mt dna
â„–4165237[Quote]
>>4165225no not really jomon are more Japanese and north east asian related , its an interesting case of basal east Eurasian branches D1B1(D M55) a pretty rare basal branch while tiobet if im not wrong is D1a2 and other related sub clades (still an interesting case of a basal ghost branch)
â„–4165626[Quote]
>>4165194 (OP)it also could be both northern japan and tibet highlands are the two most isolated places in asia, which preserved one of the most ancient bloodline independently
â„–4165843[Quote]
They used a ancient Tibetan monk technique to astral project their dna into the hapon