â„–4160344[Quote]
upboated saaaaar, this will go trending on r/goodcomebacks saaaaaaaar
â„–4160354[Quote]
how does someone even believe they're smart just because they're white/they're racist/they love hitler or whatever lmao
â„–4160361[Quote]
>>4160354Because they're little bigoted chudcel pissbabies
â„–4160369[Quote]
Facts
â„–4160375[Quote]
Screw women theyre retarded kekekek
â„–4160389[Quote]
>>4160384Us reddit folx are giga because we're decent human beings and have basic human empathy unlike incel chuds who worship Hitler
â„–4160390[Quote]
Women are attracted to people who can propel them forward and upwards, and secure their future.
What I mean by this is, they are attracted to you if you are smart, secure in yourself, able to maintain your life and contribute meaningfully to hers. People want partners in life. On equal ground. Mutual respect is a big thing. Most women are reasonably secure in themselves and if you want to date one you should be bringing something to the table.
â„–4160395[Quote]
>>4160388Does not matter if he is the most shredded, attractive body builder on earth. If he cannot seriously contribute to a woman's long-term future there is little appeal to him beyond just fucking.
â„–4160406[Quote]
>>4160338 (OP)For an actual answer, intelligence is rather difficult to notice when you're all tribal niggers hunting for food, it also requires some level of experience to even be useful, and that in and of itself is difficult to attain without dying, overall, most moids died before intelligence could be useful, thus it was mostly inconsequential for species survival.
â„–4160413[Quote]
>>4160395I personally know a guy who was so broke and such a failure of a man that he would straight up borrow money from his girlfriends and then never return it. He always had a girl, sometimes he was dating 2 girls at the same time in secret. And yes, he was the one who initiated every single breakup in his life. How did he manage all that? He's extremely attractive, that's how. Any society that gives women full sexual freedom is doomed to fail because their sexual preferences are dysgenic.
â„–4160419[Quote]
>>4160413I know you're not wrong. Some men are able to do that. They find women are vulnerable and manipulate them / live with them to survive. People are easily manipulated.
â„–4160420[Quote]
>>4160388tbh he looks like a hobo, not because of his face or whatever, just needs a bear cut and some better clothes, and a better hat
â„–4160421[Quote]
Hell, there are two alcoholics in my apartment block who barely scrape by and have to be rescued from their drinking binges by their wives. They live like shit and own nothing. And yet their women are still with them.
â„–4160422[Quote]
>>4160421Once you get into your mid 20's it becomes very hard to meet new people to date so you tend to cling to the relationships that you do have.
â„–4160425[Quote]
>>4160362Funnily enough this meme comes from 4chans board /his/ that always accuses any vaguely right-wing poster of being a 2016 reddit election tourist
â„–4160428[Quote]
>>4160421slavic couples always has an attractive woman and a shrek man
â„–4160430[Quote]
>>4160388>Hideous ape man resolve sncaAnd that's supposed to be attractive to who exactly
>>4160423Welcome to capitalism sissy
â„–4160431[Quote]
>>4160413Retarded zigger faggot, the traits selected for sexual selection are neutral in terms of survival, the main purpose of sexual selection is to differentiate male from female and assign them their corresponding differences, anecdotal evidence is not enough to disprove evolution as a theory.
â„–4160432[Quote]
>>4160425You mean the redditor soyjak trend?
â„–4160445[Quote]
>>4160432No I meant the image at the start of the thread
â„–4160447[Quote]
>>4160431>the main purpose of sexual selection is to differentiate male from female and assign them their corresponding differencesNo, where did you get that?
The purpose of sexual selection is to exclude inferior genes from the gene pool by only allowing the most successful specimens reproduce.
â„–4160462[Quote]
>>4160455>retarded hidden meaningWhat do you mean? You just blamed the capitalism for thinking, that the only reason to live is having money.
â„–4160469[Quote]
>>4160418It doesn't necessarily need to be money, but yes, making your whole life's purpose reproduction is rather shallow, especially if you have no shot at achieving it.
>>4160447You stupid fucking zigger, that's natural selection, if sexual selection is meant to be eugenics then why the fuck do female peacocks love male peacocks with big feather, ev&doe those big feather make the male peacocks easier to catch? Sexual selection does not select for advantageous traits so much as it selects for recognizable ones.
â„–4160479[Quote]
>>4160475Go troon out and get shot in a trench you cock sucking zigger
â„–4160484[Quote]
>>4160470>without that they are pretty much uselessWhy, doe? Can't ugly men get a girlfriend, using their own personality or something?
â„–4160485[Quote]
>>4160479Read what's written on the picture, then go get flayed by a cartel enforcer outside your house
â„–4160492[Quote]
>>4160475GEEEEEEEEEEG, you do know the AI proved you wrong, right?
>Success in obtaining mates and reproducing, RATHER THAN just surviving.I'd kill myself at such self humiliation, you literally did the work for me!
â„–4160496[Quote]
And to obtain mates, you must develop the traits they are looking for, this rectifies sexual dimorphism, now go rope my little slavshit
â„–4160497[Quote]
>>4160469>why the fuck do female peacocks love male peacocks with big feather, ev&doe those big feather make the male peacocks easier to catch?Because the fact that you lived so long despite having such big feathers that make you easy to catch meangs that you are quick and smart, you fucking retarded ape.
You are absolutely deranged if you think the purpose of sexual selection is to just "differentiate male from female"
â„–4160500[Quote]
>>4160492It actually proves (You) wrong, you mad monkey.
Here is the next sentence:
>specific displays, bright colors, or ornaments that signal good genetics. â„–4160503[Quote]
>>4160496>And to obtain mates, you must develop the traits they are looking forlike a better jawline, hunter eyes, symmetrical face, tall heigth, bigger dick?
â„–4160506[Quote]
>>4160496Genuinely why are you so upset? You started foaming at your mouth and spewing out insane insults from the get go. Did you forget to take your pills this morning or something?
â„–4160507[Quote]
>>4160496>And to obtain mates, you must develop the traits they are looking forI wonder
why mates look for specific traits, could it be something related to those traits signaling better genes that ensure the species' survival? Holy shit you are retarded
â„–4160530[Quote]
>>4160497This is cope made by AI, yes, I know you asked AI this question because I have done so myself, in no circumstance should a negative trait survive to the next generations, even if it's outweighed by some hypothetical positive trait, the point is natural selection and sexual selection work in tandem, natural selection removes the peacocks with feathers too burdening, meanwhile sexual selection removes the peacocks with far too few feathers, thus you get that sweet spot, notice how a peacock with less to no feathers is, undeniably, much more likely to survive than one with feathers, this does not stop sexual selection from selecting against a "positive trait", because, again, sexual selection has a completely different view of what is a "good" trait.
>>4160500"Good genetics" is a VERY vague term, neither you nor the AI can narrow it down, I understand what it's trying to mean doe, more complex features that come out flawless show that the genetic coding behind those features is also flawless, but note that this has NOTHING to do with survival fitness or whether those features are even a positive thing to begin with! Now stop using the AI to think for you.
>>4160503Yes
>>4160506I'm mean to people in this site, why are you acting so sensitive geg
>>4160507Some traits do arise out of a genuine survival fitness, big hips for females is quite among mammals since it helps the female birth children - thus it is both selected in sexual and natural selection, this isn't the case for all traits, however, just like the example I gave with the Peacock, or how certain crab species have a large, almost unusable claw for the sake of mate seeking, the objective is to stand out and attract the opposite sex.
>>4160519Already raped this argument, you've just gotten TRVTHNVKED
â„–4160575[Quote]
>>4160530Holy snca didn't read
Google AI owns you btw, I trust it way more than I trust anything you have to say because it's a neutral arbiter
â„–4160597[Quote]
>>4160591Literally didn't read again btw