[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: IMG_20260929_145127.jpg 📥︎ (201.02 KB, 597x658) ImgOps

 â„–4123067[Quote]

The average white american is genetically distant enough to be on average the equivalent of 30th cousins from eachother. Meanwhile black americans are on average 6th to 8th cousins in distance from eachother. Mexicans are at least 8th-9th cousins in distance from eachother. Puerto ricans are 3-4th cousins in distance from eachother. The only white people that actually have a genetic distance that is close enough to a nation state of people are old stock americans or colonial americansin new England, Appalachia and the south. But they are a minority as an ethnicity in comparison to the average white man man in America. Compare this for example with a truly homogenous European group like Icelandic people who are on average 3-4th cousins worth of distance you can quickly see that out of all races in america white people are technically the most biologically distant. Sometimes I wonder if this biological distance inherent to the white american population creates a genetic biological baseline reasoning that is unconscious in white people as to why they don't work together. Because tbh the only white americans that I see that actually work together to stand up for the general white man in america are typically Americans of old stock, colonial heritage. I don't see this level of resistance in typical Irish families, Italian families, polish, Ukrainian, German and Scandinavian white people's. I mean just look at the klan… klan was concentrated in just the south… which is where one of the highest populations of old stock americans are found lol… somebody analyze this and tell me if I dont or do have a point.

 â„–4123108[Quote]

High effort 0 reppeys

 â„–4123116[Quote]

>>4123108
Stfu Mexican loser
>inb4 gore spam

 â„–4123120[Quote]

>>4123067 (OP)

It's because Western Europeans tend to judge people based on their individual characteristics separated from the group and apply agreed universal standards to every human group.

So for example, if a black person robs an store, it's not really because of his race or even the culture he was sorrounded in, but his own choice in his life, according to modern western thought.


This may have been a natural development of individualism, which actually, helped to develop Nationalism as individual peoples were more defined by their ethnic origin rather than his familial origin.

Collectivistic cultures, such as that of the Arabs, are much more clannistic, which makes Nationalism very hard, as Arabs descended from different tribes wouldn't get along very well, thus diminishing any potential of having a more unified human group such as a Nation-State.

 â„–4123122[Quote]

>>4123116
I dont do dat doe

 â„–4123126[Quote]

up



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]