â„–4067978[Quote]
@transrightsrothbardian humble him
â„–4068012[Quote]
Che is dead, and we all mourn him. Why? How is it that so many libertarians mourn this man; how is it that we just received a letter from a briIIiant young libertarian, a former objectivist and Birchite, which said, in part: "if they did finally get Che . . . I am sure that his memory will live to haunt both Latin America and the U. S. for decades to come. Long live Che!." How come? Surely not because Che was a Communist. Precious few people in this country or anywhere else will mourn the passing, for example, of Brezhnev, Kosygin, or Ulbricht, communist leaders all. No, it is certainly not Che's communist goals which made his name a byword and a legend throughout the world, and throughout the New Left in this country.
>3rd time's the charm formatting this properly
What made Che such an heroic figure for our time is that he, more than any man of our epoch or even of our century, was the living embodiment of the principle of Revolution. More than any man since the lovable but entirely ineffectual nineteenth-century Russian anarchist, Mikhail Bakunin, Che earned the title of "professional revolutionary." And furthermore, to paraphrase Christopher Jencks in a recent perceptive, if wrongheaded, article in the New Republic, we all knew that his enemy was our enemy-that great Colossus that oppresses and threatens all the peoples of the world, U.S. imperialism.
â„–4068018[Quote]
YAF, the fusionists, and the Right-wing generally, have led the parade, in happy tandem with their supposed enemies the liberals, in supporting the Cold War and various hot wars against Communist movements abroad. This global crusading against the heathen is a total reversal of the Old "isolationist" Right-wing of my youth, the Right-wing that scorned foreign intervention and "globaloney," and attacked these adventures as statist imperialism while the Nation and the New Republic and other liberals were berating these Rightists as tools of the Kremlin.
>poop
But now your Right-wing leaders embrace every socialist, every leftist with a 100% ADA voting record, every Sidney Hook and Paul Douglas and Thomas Dodd, just so long as they stand ready to incinerate the world rather than suffer one Communist to live. What kind of a libertarian policy, what kind even of "fusionist" policy is it that justifies the slaughter of tens of thousands of American soldiers, of hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese peasants, for the sake of bringing Christianity to the heathen by sword and brimstone? I can understand why the authoritarians applaud all this, they who would like nothing more than the return of Cotton Mather or Torquemada. But what are you doing supporting them?
â„–4068038[Quote]
>>4068018>>4068012this is fucking brimstone
â„–4068065[Quote]
>>4068053celebrating those who oppose you is a great way to not only sow dissent between your own ranks, but also look uncertain and weak. Those who truly believe in what they preach don't see the gray in the myth. They only see a filthy commie
â„–4068112[Quote]
>>4068018>What kind of a libertarian policy, what kind even of "fusionist" policy is it that justifies the slaughter of tens of thousands of American soldiers, of hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese peasants, for the sake of bringing Christianity to the heathen by sword and brimstone? Guess what
I am an ANARCHIST nigga! I don't like any state government! I just hate commies! Problem, schizo?
â„–4068115[Quote]
That is giga
â„–4068147[Quote]
>don't thread on 'p
â„–4068149[Quote]
>>4068065>celebrating those who oppose you is a great way to not only sow dissent between your own ranksI don't want Timmycels who think a pedophilic, philosemetic CIA plant like Pinochet was and redpilled in my ranks.
>but also look uncertain and weakI'm not uncertain in my disbelief of Marxist theory. Marxist-Leninists are not a serious threat to me. The age of violent labor militancy is over, not that it was ever a serious threat in this country to begin with.
>Those who truly believe in what they preach don't see the gray in the myth. They only see a filthy commieThe appeal of Marxism-Leninism and similar doctrines overwhelmingly lies in legitimate grievances with the state-capitalist order. It's the same thing with natsoc, just replace legitimate labor grievances with legitimate White grievances.
>>4068112Murray Rothbard was also an anarchist. This crude "just kill all who disagree with me" mentality of yours is an insult to the anarchist intellectual tradition.
â„–4068153[Quote]
*like Pinochet was based and redpilled
â„–4068201[Quote]
>>4068149>"just kill all who disagree with me"Who said this? I don't believe in murder, actually.
â„–4068208[Quote]
>>4068149>The appeal of Marxism-Leninism and similar doctrines overwhelmingly lies in legitimate grievances with the state-capitalist order. It's the same thing with natsoc, just replace legitimate labor grievances with legitimate White grievances.the commies and Nazis still despised each other like pakis and Indians. trying to find brotherhood in the enemy isn't a game winning strat
>I'm not uncertain in my disbelief of Marxist theory. Marxist-Leninists are not a serious threat to me. The age of violent labor militancy is over, not that it was ever a serious threat in this country to begin with.you not being uncertain of your disbelief of marxism is nice and all, but Optics precede ideological convictions
>I don't want Timmycels who think a pedophilic, philosemetic CIA plant like Pinochet was and redpilled in my ranks.you don't really have a choice. You celebrating Che, and them celebrating Chet, just inevitably leads to infighting. All political ideologies need to recruit first, purify later.
â„–4068240[Quote]
gigas kill commies, simple as