>>4062840"Axiomatic poop" isn't a recognized category, but if we take it literally as a physical substance that is somehow self-evident, foundational, and requires no proof, then we can ask: could such poop be deposited on the Non-Aggression Axiom?
No-for the same reason as before, plus one more:
1. The axiom still has no physical surface. Even axiomatic poop needs a physical target. A concept can't receive matter.
2. "Axiomatic" describes propositions, not substances. An axiom is a starting premise accepted without derivation. Poop is matter. Combining the words doesn't create a new kind of object that can bridge the abstract/physical gap.
3. If "axiomatic poop" means "poop that is self-evidently poop," that's just ordinary poop with a philosophical label. It still lands on paper, stone, or skin-not on a principle.
4. If it means "poop that serves as an axiom," then it's a premise in a reasoning system, not a physical missile. It can't be thrown at an abstraction.
So literally: No. Axiomatic poop is either ordinary matter or a category error. Either way, the Non-Aggression Axiom remains unpoopable.