[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: sisa.png 📥︎ (254.55 KB, 1106x1012) ImgOps

 â„–4016856[Quote]

>left wing nationalists

 â„–4016862[Quote]

Antifa and modern day anonymous

 â„–4016909[Quote]

File: img-2026-09-08-19-54-51.png 📥︎ (2.49 MB, 1254x1254) ImgOps


 â„–4016917[Quote]

during the times of french revolution all nationalists were leftists

 â„–4016921[Quote]

l*ft wing nationalists = bibisi nationalists

 â„–4016923[Quote]

my moms side of the family: left wing socdem nationalism
my dads side of the family: right wing Gaucho traditionalism and statocratic nationalism

 â„–4016924[Quote]

>>4016917
even doe the true nationalists were the royalists
they just didn't know it

 â„–4016937[Quote]

>>4016924
thats not true. throughout history aristocrats couldn't give a flying fuck about the problems of the majority, even if that majority was white. it's a part of being extreme high status, you become slf

 â„–4016942[Quote]

>>4016923
kaetrianus: pantied and sissified

 â„–4016946[Quote]

>>4016937
the aristocrats were part of the people doe
they weren't simply born from nowhere
they were promoving the interests of the FRENCH crown, the FRENCH clergy, the FRENCH military, landholders, farmers, aristocrats, artesans
they were promoving also french culture and traditions, way more nationalist than the leftie babble

 â„–4016951[Quote]

their nationalism was telluric and so rooted in their psyque they didn't even knew they were nationalists
were the jacobin nationalism was cosmopolitan, a borgiosie invention, a development, not something organic, natural
you can even make this distinction in the 1930s and even in the modern day btw
its easy to distinguish between the cosmopolitan and the telluric

 â„–4016972[Quote]

File: 16723834425237.jpg 📥︎ (34.77 KB, 1024x547) ImgOps

>>4016937
Maybe gaucho is a big fan of the July Monarchy

 â„–4016975[Quote]

>>4016937
also that's a myth the aristocracy was way more carrying and noble than you belive
it was a Knightley virtue to care for the lower castes, christian European societies were not just authoritarian and patriarchal but paternal and solidary
noblesse oblige was a big principle back then
also regional and cultural identity was also held promoved and preserved, patriotism was a thing even if they didn't really have a national theory or philosophy
the crown is the nation and the nation is the crown, the king is the chieftain, the tribal manifestation of a nation and race on a individual with the objective of represent said people and race

 â„–4016984[Quote]

>>4016972
ehh 50/50
too liberal but there were obviously some good things about it, the bonapartist regimes too
one of my big ideological influences is action francaise and they supported the Orleans (for fusionist reasons not liberal ones)
the embracement of nationalism that reactionaries and Catholics took in the 20th century was one of the biggest Ws ever
the old system was too dated and rusty, the old elites needed to evolve and modernize with times, we can't simply remain absolutist in the 1900s
that's one of the reasons i belive the french revolution and other social historical events were necessary, even if their outcomes weren't my ones of choice
the aristocrats needed to wake the fuck up, theres no way in hell we could preserve tradition faith and order if we remain in the old ways

 â„–4016996[Quote]

>>4016984
If youre a monarchist and think the republican anti monarchist revolution was necessary then you're cucked gaucho.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]