â„–4014789[Quote]
The second image really clarified everything
â„–4014795[Quote]
>>4014775 (OP)Whatever benefits me is best
â„–4014798[Quote]
Common law seems more flexible. That could be good and bad, but I think the good outweighs the bad.
â„–4014808[Quote]
>>4014775 (OP)the code civil would only be possible on stable lands. Since it was so unflexible and way too centralized, napoleon lost a lot of authority over his lands and therefor lost the war.
aldoe its way more civilized and evolved, it would require peace and unity to work.
in times of uncertainty the 2nd option is far better
â„–4014837[Quote]
>>4014831Ok I think I get it
â„–4014840[Quote]
I am no expert in this but to me it looks like civil law actually judges everyone equally and predictably while common law gives too much power to the judge
â„–4014896[Quote]
Civil
â„–4014900[Quote]
>>4014876Well, you can argue the opposite for the common law. And between the two, I'd rather it be in favor of the legislature, not for the sake of it, but because the specific advantage we are discussing is predictable and fixed due to the its own very nature of it being a coded set of laws, contrasting to the more ambiguous and therefore more susceptible to abuse type of power that would be granted to the judges through the common law.
â„–4014902[Quote]
holy fucking snca
â„–4014903[Quote]
>>4014900spanish sissy gem
â„–4014964[Quote]
>>4014912I still believe that a fixed interpretation is always going to be preferable to "interpretation". We're going in circles so let's agree to disagree.
â„–4014967[Quote]
We all saw that spanish sissy fail
â„–4014972[Quote]
>>4014970Me and my friends
â„–4014974[Quote]
>>4014964Fuck I used the same word twice. You know what I mean
â„–4014979[Quote]
>>4014974Spanish sissy fail, once again.
â„–4015029[Quote]
>>4015017Not specifically that but you have had the same concerns regarding anglophilia on the right
â„–4015055[Quote]
>>4014775 (OP)Civil law.
In the end it depends on the people, neither of them will succeed in a Nigger nation.