Which is closer to perfection?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
Flag
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

Chud bsqWYat0 09/08/26 (Tue) 03:44:18 №4012199 [Quote]

Which is closer to perfection?

Chud 8pT!7Ws8 09/08/26 (Tue) 03:47:45 №4012200 [Quote]

Jesus Christ.

Chud KrX!aLRi 09/08/26 (Tue) 03:47:46 №4012201 [Quote]

>>4012199 (OP)
Nothing is defined as nothing, if anybody is voting the second option they don't know what they're voting for.

Chud 35OxWuuT 09/08/26 (Tue) 03:47:53 №4012202 [Quote]

File: 1787822483611y.jpg 📥︎ (503.32 KB, 2340x1080) ImgOps

Is the glass half full or half empty?

Chud BMTIo4ik [VPN] 09/08/26 (Tue) 04:01:45 №4012218 [Quote]

File: Screenshot_2026-09-07_23-0….png 📥︎ (162.73 KB, 744x519) ImgOps

>>4012199 (OP)

Chud KrX!aLRi 09/08/26 (Tue) 04:06:00 №4012225 [Quote]

>>4012218
It's because you're a VPN nigger

Chud Z!nS16Eq 09/08/26 (Tue) 04:42:23 №4012319 [Quote]

File: Oekaki.png 📥︎ (16 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

What do we mean by perfection? The most stable? The most just or fair by moral rules? If treated as an ideal, then it's nothingness, in nothingness there is no moral code to break, even then you can't break it, it's absolutely neutral. As opposed to the current world where malice can happen. If treated as stability, nothingness can have no entropy, no qualities to make it imperfect or messy, neither qualities to make it perfect. All that is has qualities to make it imperfect, yet no qualities to make it perfect.

Chud KrX!aLRi 09/08/26 (Tue) 04:46:29 №4012329 [Quote]

>>4012319
All this babble when perfection doesn't even exist

Chud Z!nS16Eq 09/08/26 (Tue) 04:47:15 №4012333 [Quote]

>>4012319
Though one could say nothingness bypasses the definition entirely, since something can't appear on a spectrum if there are no qualities
>>4012329
Of course, but the question is what is closer to that ideal perfection.