â3991821[Quote]
many say this
â3991823[Quote]
>In the based White nationalist future Fourth Reich, what would be wrong with a White gay couple that wears protection and economically sustains a straight couple's children(s)?
(Beatbox 2 bars)
Ya'll gone make me act a fool, up in here, up in here
Ya'll gone make me loose my cool, up in here up in here,
Ya'll gone make me bust a smack, up in here, up in here,
Ya'll gone make my fingers snap, up in here, up in here,
Why should I battle a crusty old man,
When you can't even defeat a little weak Peter Pan,
Ya lucky this is only a beatbox battle,
Cause in a real battle I make ya feel rattled,
Look at him, he only got one planet,
I got the whole Galaxy under my dependence,
You're gonna beg when you bleed and die,
As you realize destiny arrived,
Ya'll gone make me + Beatbox
Ya'll gone make me + Beatbox
Ya'll gone make me + Beatbox
Ya'll gone make me + Beatbox
(Beatbox 2 bars)
Let me show you how to scratch it
(Beatbox)
Either way, destiny still arrives "
â3991833[Quote]
Nietzsche spoke of this.
â3991844[Quote]
Serious thread.
â3991845[Quote]
kill the fags
â3991847[Quote]
The vast amount of gay couples horrifically abusing children in every fucking way disproves this as a possibility.
â3991858[Quote]
>>39918471. Source?
2. What about those who don't?
3. Not inside the scope of my question anyway.
â3991862[Quote]
>>3991858Are you implying your taxes facilitating yt families? Or do you mean adopting them?
â3991887[Quote]
>>3991870Oh, I misunderstood you. I thought you ment adopting.
You op perspective feels like the same questioning from early 2010s. What can you provide to prove that if what you want, you get, doesn't become what we have today (essentially Weimar Germany (socially))?
â3991914[Quote]
Also how do you contend with the reality that ~50% of gays +admit+ to being sexually abused as a child? Homosexuality is, if actually a genetic trait, a trait that self selects out of the genepool, and therefore is illogical for it to exist at all, in any extended generational period of time. Thus heavily implying that it is almost exclusively a result from abuse of one kind or another alone.
â3991925[Quote]
>>3991815 (OP)Because homosexuality can and should be prevented.
â3991938[Quote]
>>3991913I'll shorten it.
Why do you think, if you get what you are asking in your op, society won't slip back down into pride (pedo) parades, dragqueen (pedo) story hour, teaching anything about sexual deviencies to children, grooming kids and people into being trans and gay, explicitly when there is no perceived propensity for those "traits"?
â3991940[Quote]
>>3991938I didn't shorten it, but I explained the question better
â3991947[Quote]
It would be shit noone cares about
â3991949[Quote]
>>3991938slippery slop fallacy
â3991955[Quote]
>>3991949Its not a fallacy if we are fucking living it.
â3991961[Quote]
>>3991940>>3991938>>3991914I don't feel like answering allat so I concede.
â3991962[Quote]
>>3991949It's not a fallacy if there's enough proof, which through observation there is, you actual moron.
â3991966[Quote]
>>3991962what proof? observation? so anectodal evidence. insufficient.
â3991974[Quote]
>>3991960Fuck off, I'm genuinely asking op.
â3991980[Quote]
>>3991961No, please. I actually want at least some kind of answer.
â3991984[Quote]
>>3991966Anecdotal evidence is called evidence for a fucking reason you actual retard.
â3992007[Quote]
>>3991961>pride (pedo) parades, dragqueen (pedo) story hour, teaching anything about sexual deviencies to children, grooming kids and people into being trans and gay, explicitly when there is no perceived propensity for those "traits"These things are non negotiables. Why do you think wholesomechungus gay couples won't eventually devolve into the green text above, over ~20 years?
â3992019[Quote]
>>3991999>most things in this world aren't quantifiable but do still existlike what? air is completely quantifiable. gravity is measureable. our consciousness is observable.
â3992020[Quote]
>>3992007And to clarify, its not that one gay couple over 20 years goes from wholesomechungus to demon, its a over all social shift in that 20 years.
â3992021[Quote]
>>3992007The burden of proof is on you who made the original claim. Why do you think that they will do those things?
â3992024[Quote]
>>3992019>ObservableGeg, lmao even, proved my point, quantify consciousness.
â3992025[Quote]
>>3992021I'm just going to filter you.
â3992028[Quote]
>>3992024The chemical reactions that shape our mind, snyapses firing, MRI scans… do they not have this technology in brazil?
â3992030[Quote]
>>3992025I accept your concession.
â3992033[Quote]
>>3992028I don't see any graphs or numbers you fucking moron, that's what quantification is, show me a graph that cleanly differentiates man from chimp in consciousness, that's what you're asking from me, retard.
â3992036[Quote]
>>3992030Never conceded anything, never joined a debate, was never talking to you.
>dod ip â3992041[Quote]
They can't debunk this
â3992045[Quote]
>>3992036Cope.
>>3992033You can absolutely chart brain activity.
â3992056[Quote]
>>3992028Furthermore, can you quantify the differences between Rome and Carthage? Or the difference between sadness and happiness?
>>3992045Sooooorce? Why should I trust you, faggots?
â3992065[Quote]
>>3992056>Furthermore, can you quantify the differences between Rome and Carthage? sure. you can easily do that. population, demographics etc… this is pretty basic stuff..
â3992069[Quote]
This ameriburger is so retarded, please, use some critical thinking for once and come to your own conclusion instead of screaming for someone to come up with a graph in a discussion where graphs don't even apply, go read what a fucking soft science is you actual troglodyte.
â3992076[Quote]
>>3992069stop chimping out. i get its your culture but this is a white man's website. act accordingly.
â3992090[Quote]
>>3992065>No sourceActually just cucked and fucked you, and besides, I was clearly talking about shit like culture and language, pedantic faggots
>>3992076Retards make me angry, midwits make me rage and seethe, you are an academic cock sucker who can't think for yourself
>Ad Hominem without addressing meCan't even apply his own retarded bullshit to himself, KYS Amerimutt
â3992098[Quote]
>>3992007>>3992020Op, this is the crux of the whole argument against your whole desire. At least think about. The whole point is to keep children safe. And we all saw across the west the transition from accepting gays, to accepting all the other overt demonic slop. If you can come up with a way to effectively separate those connections, who am I to invade every home and police every bed?
<redditI am convince the proliferation of things like witchcraft and other forms of literal demon worshipping is the pillars of all this happening like it is. Many of these people do 'sex magic', and its as ancient as it gets, and about as bad as you can imagine.
<redditWas a gay couple who kept their secret a secret better off before, when no one even knew? Or is it better now, when there are open pedophiles who take on the label as gay, so they can shield themselves from criticism?
â3992102[Quote]
>>3992090>I was clearly talking about shit like culture and language, pedantic faggotsNo you werent? Show me exactly where in your original comment you even alluded to these things.
>Retards make me angry, midwits make me rage and seethe, you are an academic cock sucker who can't think for yourselfad hominem + gay penis obsession
â3992105[Quote]
>>3992098correlation =/= causation
â3992117[Quote]
>>3992090That amerimutt isn't a retard. They know exactly what they are doing. They don't want any kind of discussion. They want to real, horrific problems, to be swept under the rug. And so they choose to use debate tactics, that are comically ineffective, but work on the unaware lurker.
â3992126[Quote]
>>3992117appeal to emotion fallacy. im not the boogeyman lol.
â3992132[Quote]
>>3992105Since you are so smart. Explain exactly why and how it won't happen again. Given that it has happened every single time throughout every nation on planet earth that has ever existed.
â3992139[Quote]
>>3992126Irrelevant claim against my point.
â3992142[Quote]
>>3992102>differences between X and Y<Only takes into consideration the differences which can be quantified You nitpicked, because obviously culture and language are non quantifiable differences that destroyed your argument, so you ignorantly focused on what proved your point, moron.
>Muh Ad HominemThe fact your hypocrisy flies over your smooth brain is quite telling
>>3992117I know, he's a retarded midwit that can only list fallacies without even understanding why they're fallacious
â3992149[Quote]
When my wife dies im turning gay and marrying a man
â3992154[Quote]
>>3992132The burden of proof is not on me.
>Given that it has happened every single time throughout every nation on planet earth that has ever existed.Ridiculous claim with nothing behind it.
>>3992139Completely relevant.
>>3992142>You nitpickedWhat? You asked for the quantifiable differences between Rome and Carthage… Is this normal behavior in brazil?
>I know, he's a retarded midwit that can only list fallacies without even understanding why they're fallaciousEven more ad hominems. Your credibility shrinks by the post.
â3992155[Quote]
>>3992150Op said they went suggesting a gay couple adopt children.
â3992164[Quote]
>>3992154>The burden of proof is not on me.So you conceded. Thanks.
â3992178[Quote]
>>3992164>fails to bring any proof aside from correlation = causation slop and anecdotal biasI accept your concession (again)
â3992189[Quote]
>>3992154My fucking god, I hate debate bros, can't you see you're conceding here? You'd rather focus on the semantics of my argument then actually admit there exists non quantifiable concepts, of course you don't care about a good faith argument, you're only here to feel smart and be buck broken by someone actually smart
>Muh Ad Hominem again>Haha you're Brazilian hahaGenuinely commit suicide prick, and you're committing a fallacy fallacy here, just because Ad Hominem does not invalidate my larger argument, stop nit picking my mistakes already you faggot.
â3992210[Quote]
>>3992189>my mistakes I accept your concession. I hope you can learn and grow from this experience. Bravo for being a good sport!
â3992229[Quote]
>>3992178Modern us, Thailand, renaissance UK, Italy, France, Weimar Germany, ancient China Egypt persia Greece Rome India, premodern China Japan India, all have the same pattern of behavior, social acceptance of homosexuality>pedophilia, transgenderism and all other forms of sexual degeneracy.
If you genuinely require 10 years worth of historical analysis in one thread, you are willfully being dishonest.
You willfully refuse to explain how the normalization of homosexuality always is followed by pedophilia, transgenderism and all other forms of sexual degeneracy.
â3992243[Quote]
white power rothbardian reich
â3992244[Quote]
>>3992229You mistakenly apply modern day notions of sexuality onto ancient cultures. The ancient greeks and romans didn't develop pedophilia out of homosexuality, they were exclusively pederasts first. Egelegabulus being portrayed as a crossdressing sissy slut by his enemies doesn't prove anything really.
You are arguing in bad faith.
â3992251[Quote]
>>3992244(You) are argueing in bad faith.
>and all other forms of sexual degeneracy. â3992252[Quote]
>>3992244>Replies to the guy who already filtered him instead of meI accept your concession (:
â3992263[Quote]
>3992252I already won the debate. Please stop embarrassing yourself and just take the L.
>>3992251>Fails to address my main pointI accept your concession.
â3992270[Quote]
>>3992263>refuse to address my main pointI accept your concession
â3992281[Quote]
>>3992270>ParrotingKek! I think I broke this one. Bring me another.
>3992273>nufags don't know about (You) denialkek
â3992286[Quote]
>>3992281>kekGo back deciever
â3992294[Quote]
>>3992281>Being such a petty faggot you don't reply to the guy who buckbroke you in broad daylightI didn't know it hurt you that badly man, still accepting that concession doe
â3992295[Quote]
ITT I intellectually mog and toy with two midwits.
*yawn*
â3992296[Quote]
>>3992195The point is to counteract the idea that queer people would hurt fertility and therefore are detrimental to le epik white nationalism, and also that children raised by gay people turn out bad, which may or may not be true, but I was steel manning.
â3992302[Quote]
>>3992287Op seemingly waant baiting.
>>3992295Failtroll
â3992309[Quote]
>>3992282Amerimutt faggot trying to use debate tactics and failing hilariously
â3992313[Quote]
>>3992295>Y-yeah! I was just trolling the entire time guys… I totally didn't just start seething for no reason!Why do niggers stay in denial even to the bitter end? This ameriburger is actual bio-waste geg
â3992314[Quote]
>>3992302The Panama
(((VPN)))?
All he does is baiting.
Sometimes he straight up copy something from reddit and post it here (or so it feels)
Op you are a massive faggot, if you want check 4chan, your cheap baits will work better there
â3992320[Quote]
>>3992314Oh shit. Thanks for the info.
â3992338[Quote]
>>3992296I think it's kind of impossible to argue against the suggestion gays are bad for fertility. Straights have kids and gays don't.
>>3992309What debate tactics? I genuinely find this thread confusing is all.
â3992346[Quote]
>>3992338He was using the typical debate bro tactic of shutting down someone by nitpicking their argument, for example pointing out inconsequential fallacies, asking for a source for clearly observable phenomena and just being all around delusionally arrogant.
â3992351[Quote]
>>3992338>uhm that's le heckin fallacyOften when its literally not or applicable at all. Literal debate strategies.
â3992359[Quote]
>>3992346Brazil galaxy brain
â3992376[Quote]
>>3992338What if the gay people pay the state in order for it to raise children or something. I mean, the limiting rate of fertility is usually not biological.
â3992382[Quote]
>>3992368I'm not talking about you bro
â3992383[Quote]
>>3992368We weren't referring to you saar, it's a different American geg